On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mrinal Kalakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to > any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version, > plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs) The disadvantage, last time I checked, is that it's still tedious to get them processed on Unix. Maybe that's not necessary, but I always argue with any decision that (in practice) drives data or a process out of the realm of portability. -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???"... David T-G
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???... Byrial Jensen
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Kai Blin
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Charles Curley
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... David Champion
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... David Champion
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Mrinal Kalakrishnan
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Kai Blin
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Marius Gedminas
- Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to al... Suresh Ramasubramanian