Re: Netskrt - ISP-colo CDN

Agreed ... it generally doesn't make sense to install caches where the content is just a few racks over. But if you have a network that serves smaller population centers where CDNs are sparse or non-existent, then it gets the content closer to the eyeballs and saves considerably on transport

Re: v4 and v6 BOGON list

+1 On 3/22/24 11:28, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: bogons.cymru.com has been around as a BGP feed for a long long time. https://www.team-cymru.com/bogon-networks *From: *NANOG on behalf of Gabriel Terry *Date: *Friday, 22 March 2024 at 3:56 PM

Re: Consolidated Communications contact?

We got it sorted out. Thank you very much to all who reached out! On 3/15/24 20:25, Bryan Holloway wrote: Thanks to all who have already responded ... probably should've mentioned the AS number, since they appear to have many: AS25660 On 3/15/24 19:59, Bryan Holloway wrote: If anyone

Re: Consolidated Communications contact?

Thanks to all who have already responded ... probably should've mentioned the AS number, since they appear to have many: AS25660 On 3/15/24 19:59, Bryan Holloway wrote: If anyone from Consolidated Communications is lurking, could you please contact me off-list? We have a mutual

Consolidated Communications contact?

If anyone from Consolidated Communications is lurking, could you please contact me off-list? We have a mutual customer with a strange routing issue between our two networks. Thanks! - bryan

Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4

On 2/13/24 21:47, Hunter Fuller wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:17 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Routing+Protocol+Overview Ping across? Sure. Ok. But I wouldn't rely on it for anything critical. Well that's certainly interesting. You will not see me

Re: The Reg does 240/4

this. --TimH On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:04:45 +0100 Bryan Holloway wrote: Let me know when they support /31s. On 2/13/24 08:07, Dave Taht wrote: And routerOS is one of the more up to date platforms.

Re: jaguar network contact?

Probably should've been clearer ... this is jaguar network AS30781 in France. (Thank you to those who have already reached out!) Apologies for the noise ... On 2/13/24 18:05, Bryan Holloway wrote: If anyone here is lurking from Jaguar Network, could you reach out to me off-list, please? I

jaguar network contact?

If anyone here is lurking from Jaguar Network, could you reach out to me off-list, please? I think you're blocking at least one, possibly more of our subnets. Thank you! - bryan

Re: The Reg does 240/4

Let me know when they support /31s. On 2/13/24 08:07, Dave Taht wrote: And routerOS is one of the more up to date platforms.

Re: [outages] Twelve99 / AWS usw2 significant loss

Can we not talk about prepending again? ;) On 1/27/24 01:43, Andras Toth wrote: Seems like the destination is in Hetzner, they could also raise it with Twelve99 or prepend routes to use an alternate path. On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 7:46 PM Phil Lavin via Outages mailto:outa...@outages.org>>

Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating

On 1/15/24 23:11, Martin Hannigan wrote: On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:10 PM Jay Hennigan > wrote: On 1/15/24 10:37, Pennington, Scott wrote: > yes but it has been -8 in Chicago plenty of times before this. >   Very interested in root cause...

Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating

I think we're beyond "hypothetical" at this point, Mike ... ;) On 1/15/24 15:49, Mike Hammett wrote: Coincidence indeed   ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions

Re: ipv6 address management - documentation

I've also heard good things about Netbox. TeemIP ain't too shabby either. On 11/17/23 06:57, Ryan Hamel wrote: Christopher, A residential customer would be getting their /56 from the providers pool via RA or DHCPv6. With a /32 aggregate, it can handle 1.6 million /56 delegations, which can

Re: The rise and fall of the 90's telecom bubble

On 11/14/23 15:04, Mike Hammett wrote: "It would be nice if some folks on the list could provide some solid information, even if only for one large carrier." One of the busts that I never found much on was the Enron network. Where did it end up? I'd be interested in local route and POP

Re: Discord contacts

I don't know if this is related or not, but we've been working a strange issue with a Cloudflare-hosted site for weeks now, where some source IPs incur a 45-60 second delay on page-loads to a specific web-site, but other source IPs load instantaneously. We can't find a common denominator.

Re: SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP feed

Not sure if this helps, but they only appear to block 25 for IPv4. IPv6 works fine. Supposedly you can open a support-ticket to have this block removed, but I'm assuming you've already done that? - bryan On 9/26/23 12:09, Daniel Corbe wrote: Hey all, I apologize if this

TACACS+ server recommendations?

Ah, the good old days when I could download the latest tac_plus code from the Cisco FTP site, compile it, and off I go. But I digress. Curious if there are any operators out there that have a good recommendation on a lightweight TACACS+ server for ~200 NEs and access-control for 20-30 folks.

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

On 5/8/23 18:45, Mark Tinka wrote: On 5/8/23 15:44, Bryan Holloway wrote: You said, "IS-IS in Quagga and FRR are not yet ready for business, ..." Not ready for business in what way? Performance? Cross-vendor compatibility? Features? Or did I misunderstand your statement? B

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

On 5/8/23 07:03, Mark Tinka wrote: On 5/8/23 00:22, Bryan Holloway wrote: Curious to hear more specifics about your IS-IS assertion. We've been running it on FRR for some time without incident, but I'll concede that we don't do very much with it other than saying, "hey -- we're her

Re: Best Linux (or BSD) hosted BGP?

Curious to hear more specifics about your IS-IS assertion. We've been running it on FRR for some time without incident, but I'll concede that we don't do very much with it other than saying, "hey -- we're here; oh, and you're there." On 5/4/23 06:04, Mark Tinka wrote: On 5/4/23 00:51,

Looking for an AS60068 (CDN77) contact ...

... in the peering department. If there's anyone lurking, could you please contact me off-list? Thanks! - bryan

Comcast circuit guru lurking?

Looking for some help or direction with MTU issues on a recently installed point-to-point circuit. Attempts to rectify have involved front-line PMs/folks who don't grok the problem. Please contact me off-list, thank you!! - bryan

Anyone from Verisign peering lurking?

Trying to resolve a peering issue; e-mails to listed contacts have been fruitless ... thanks!

AMS-IX @ 350 Cermak issue?

Anyone else having issues with AMS-IX at 350 Cermak? Our circuit has been bouncing on and off all day. I'd suspect our optics/port, except that when it's up, some BGP sessions come up, but not all. The ones that don't come up aren't pingable. Leads me to believe it's not us. E-mails to

Re: Anyone from Cloudflare peering about?

Heard from not one, not two, but THREE folks at Cloudflare! Now that's service. Thanks, everyone! On 8/21/22 13:11, Bryan Holloway wrote: Trying to fix a peer and not getting much traction through peering@ ... Feel free to contact me off-list. Thanks!

Anyone from Cloudflare peering about?

Trying to fix a peer and not getting much traction through peering@ ... Feel free to contact me off-list. Thanks!

Fastly Peering Contact?

Hey all ... looking for a Fastly (54113) peering contact that might be able to get me in touch with the right folks to do stuff. E-mails to the 'policy' peeringdb contact don't seem to be getting through. Thanks! - bryan

Re: The great Netflix vpn debacle!

Thanks, Owen ... good point. Now hearing reports for these same prefixes with Disney+ too. So the common denominators are: HBO Hulu Netflix Amazon Prime Disney+ ... there has _got_ to be some new-fangled DB somewhere. This all started in the last month or so. All of our RR objects, whois,

Re: The great Netflix vpn debacle!

Indeed. Let me be 100% clear: We are having issues with prefixes flagged as VPNs. They are not. We are NOT having issues with prefixes and geolocation. On 8/31/21 9:24 PM, Niels Bakker wrote: * war...@kumari.net (Warren Kumari) [Tue 31 Aug 2021, 21:04 CEST]: So, RFC8805 is great and all,

Re: The great Netflix vpn debacle!

ia recording a video plea for help addressed to Obi-Wan Kenobi help me Nanog Community... you're my only hope. *From:* NANOG on behalf of Bryan Holloway *Sent:* Friday, August 27, 2021 4:56 PM *To:* Mike Hamm

Re: The great Netflix vpn debacle!

Is there some new DB that major CDNs are using? We've been getting several reports of prefixes of ours being blocked, claiming to be VPNs, even though we've been using those subnets without incident for years. HBO, Netflix, and Hulu appear to be common denominators. I have to wonder if

Re: Any2 LAX

On 6/11/21 8:25 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 6/11/21 11:18 AM, Bryan Holloway wrote: This is what I got from those guys ... -- CoreSite Incident Notification Description:  During a planned maintenance event to integrate new hardware into our MPLS core an extreme dip in Any2 traffic

Re: Any2 LAX

This is what I got from those guys ... -- CoreSite Incident Notification Description: During a planned maintenance event to integrate new hardware into our MPLS core an extreme dip in Any2 traffic was observed. After about 4 hours running in a degraded state, an emergency case was opened

Office Depot contact?

Howdy folks, If anyone from Office Depot NetOps is lurking, could you please reach out to me off-list? Looks like our whole AS is getting blocked somewhere ... Thank you! - bryan

Anyone from Intuit lurking?

Got some customers on certain prefixes which are unable to reach various *.intuit.com sites. We've checked all routing/peering and it looks like there may be a block in place. If someone from Intuit is lurking, could you reach out to me off-list? Thank you!

Re: AW: OVH datacenter SBG2 in Strasbourg on fire 

Vitrol™ -- Ask for it by name. At $dayjob-1 I ran one of Enron's old (abandoned) datacenters which was built in the early aughts or earlier. Even that had full pre-action systems, which we once triggered when one of my colleagues accidentally hooked up a battery backwards. *poof* Fire

Anyone from Cloudflare peering lurking?

Trying to get a few pubIX sessions up ... ping me off-list, s.v.p.? E-mails to the usual contacts aren't working. Thanks!

Re: Hosting recommendations ... ?

Thank you, everyone, for the advice, input, and suggestions, both on- and off-list. Got a few sales pitches too, which was to be expected. :) All good. Much appreciated, again. Cheers, - bryan On 1/19/21 4:44 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: Hey gang ... Looking for a reputable

Re: Hosting recommendations ... ?

On 1/19/21 6:33 PM, Brandon Martin wrote: On 1/19/21 11:44 AM, William Herrin wrote: Cloud = you get virtual servers with virtual storage, generally adjustable to meet your needs. You manage the operating systems and storage within the virtual environment. You DO NOT manage the host

Re: Hosting recommendations ... ?

est regards, Martijn *From:* NANOG on behalf of Bryan Holloway *Sent:* 19 January 2021 18:18 *To:* William Herrin *Cc:* NANOG list *Subject:* Re: Hosting recommendations ... ? Perhaps I'm missing something, but in your #1 example "Cloud", what prev

Re: Hosting recommendations ... ?

rovider I'm looking for, if they exist. #2 would be suitable, but it seems to be that if leased bare-metal dies, it will be some time for ETR. Less desirable, but I'm open to ideas. #3 I do now. Trying to move away from that. On 1/19/21 5:44 PM, William Herrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:31 AM Bryan

Re: Hosting recommendations ... ?

Fair questions -- answers in-line ... On 1/19/21 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: I'm kind of confused when your concern is the reputability and yet you're providing your own IP space. I care about the hosting environment's upstreams' opinions of the downstream. That is, I don't want to be in

Hosting recommendations ... ?

Hey gang ... Looking for a reputable (i.e., no hosting of spammers or other ne'er-do-wells) hosting provider with possibly a global footprint. If not, US is #1 desire; EU #2. Requirements, more or less: * Desire to host 2-3 hypervisors, probably running something akin to Proxmox ... *

Re: Parler

There's a pretty big difference between imparting knowledge and inciting violence. #redherring Disclaimer: I own this book. On 1/12/21 6:40 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: And yet, Amazon will still happily sell you this item:

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

"I'd piss on a spark plug if I thought it'd do any good ..." (Ed.: I'd take that "NOC" any day.) On 12/17/20 4:33 PM, Joe Provo wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:49:52PM -0800, Eric Kuhnke wrote: [snip] Are the days of such an environment gone forever? We can only hope so.

Mellanox / Cumulus

Curious to hear if the community has had any real-world experience using Mellanox/Cumulus (nVidia) for L2/L3 things outside of the datacenter. Like other vendors, notably Arista, they seem to be trying to move out of the datacenter and target SPs and the layer 3 market. Personally, I think

Re: Vint Cerf & Interplanetary Internet

Don't mess with Belters ... On 10/22/20 9:20 AM, C. A. Fillekes wrote: the subgroup for networks on aspherical planetoids would be EGGNOG -- we only meet during the holiays On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:59 PM Mark Andrews > wrote: It wouldn’t be NANOG.  Perhaps

Re: Ingress filtering on transits, peers, and IX ports

I too would like to know more about their methodology and actual tangibles ideally in the form of PCAPs. On 10/14/20 4:56 PM, Brian Knight via NANOG wrote: Hi Eric, I shot a message over the folk who did the testing for more info about their test.  If I'm able to find anything useful in our

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

*From: *"Mark Tinka" *To: *nanog@nanog.org *Sent: *Thursday, September 3, 2020 1:35:46 PM *Subject: *Re: Centurylink having a bad morning? On 31/Aug/20 17:57, Bryan Holloway wrote: > Not everyone will peer with you, notably, AS3356 (unle

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

On 9/2/20 1:49 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: Shawn L via NANOG wrote on 02/09/2020 12:15: We once moved a 3u server 30 miles between data centers this way. Plug redundant psu into a ups and 2 people carried it out and put them in a vehicle. hopefully none of these server moves that people have

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

Not everyone will peer with you, notably, AS3356 (unless you're big enough, which few can say.) On 8/31/20 4:33 PM, Tomas Lynch wrote: Maybe we are idealizing these so-called tier-1 carriers and we, tier-ns, should treat them as what they really are: another AS. Accept that they are going to

Re: atmark trading

o business with Atmark. Whe! Onwards. EOThread On 8/22/20 11:21 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: Bryan, This is what inbound mail filters are for. Regex them to oblivion and get on with your life. No reason to waste another millisecond on them. -mel On Aug 22, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote

Re: atmark trading

On 8/22/20 11:06 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: On Aug 22, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: It's not sales; it's some dumb mailing list managed by "Soundest", which is now owned by "Omnisend", which sounds even less fun than its predecessor. Atmark's web-

Re: atmark trading

if certain sales people refuse to stop contacting you. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 1:34 PM Bryan Holloway <mailto:br...@shout.net>> wrote: Tired of receiving spam from these jamokes. https://www.atmarktrade.com/ Atmark Trading out of Chicago. Have tried unsubscribing numerou

atmark trading

Tired of receiving spam from these jamokes. https://www.atmarktrade.com/ Atmark Trading out of Chicago. Have tried unsubscribing numerous times; e-mailed their "info" accounts to no avail. My only recourse, now, is to shame. Doubt it will do any good, but if anyone has a contact who can

Re: Microsoft AS8075 contact?

I'm in good hands ... thanks to all who responded. On 6/18/20 2:33 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: Hello ... If anyone from Microsoft peering is lurking, I could use an assist. We have a reachability issue in Chicago. E-mail to their PeeringDB NOC contact have gone unanswered. Thank you!

Microsoft AS8075 contact?

Hello ... If anyone from Microsoft peering is lurking, I could use an assist. We have a reachability issue in Chicago. E-mail to their PeeringDB NOC contact have gone unanswered. Thank you!

Re: IPv4 Broker / Service -

+1 On 6/11/20 9:38 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote: Addrex.net I know some of the principles personally and would vouch for them. On June 11, 2020 at 14:27 edwin.malle...@gmail.com (edwin.malle...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi Nanog, > > > > I have need of a reputable IPv4 broker or service

Rate-limiting BCOP?

I'm curious if the community would be willing to share their best-practices and/or recommendations and thoughts on how they handle situations where a customer buys X amount of bandwidth, but the physical link is capable of Y, where Y > X. (Yes, I speak of policy-maps, tx/rx-queues, etc.) For

Re: Integrated WIFI router and phone adapter

+1 But yes -- GPON. On 5/18/20 9:03 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 18/May/20 07:00, K MEKKAOUI wrote: Hi NANOG Community Anyone knows about a good integrated WIFI router and phone adapter that can be used to provide home and business internet and phone service. We tried couple of them but

finishline.com

If anyone from finishline.com is lurking, could you please reach out to me off-line? Our AS seems to be blocked to your web-site as a whole, which appears to be hosted by Akamai. However, the curious thing is that we see this behavior from other IPs not part of our AS, so it's difficult to

Re: mail admins?

On 4/24/20 4:58 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 4/23/20 8:48 PM, Matt Palmer wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:47:58PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: On 4/23/20 7:35 PM, Matt Palmer wrote: While I do think webauthn is a neat idea, and solves at least one very real problem (credential theft via

Re: mail admins?

On 4/23/20 6:43 AM, John Osmon wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:05:39AM +0300, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 12:45 AM Randy Bush wrote: sad. http://nanog.org used to be the brilliant example of a fully featured web site sans javascript, flash, ... That was long ago

Re: attribution

On 4/13/20 10:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote: I’m using CAIDA’s bgpreader and this one looks like it might be an example of what you want. R|R|1586714402.00|routeviews|route-views.eqix|||2914|206.126.236.12|103.148.41.0/24|206.126.236.12|2914 58717 134371 134371 134371 134371 140076 140076

Re: IS-IS IPAM platform

I've always wondered about folks' opinions about one thing, though: In y'all's opinion, do you prefer/recommend using base-10 digits or hex in your NSAP addresses? I like the former for readability, but the latter can (could) be better for automation. Maybe. I got into a heated argument

Re: AS27594 / UTSA contact?

I'm good -- many thanks to those who reached out! On 4/11/20 10:20 AM, Bryan Holloway wrote: Howdy ... if anyone from University of Texas, San Antonio (AS27594) is lurking, could you please reach out to me off-list? We have a mutual reachability problem through an IX in Dallas. Thanks!

Re: IS-IS IPAM platform

+1 On 4/13/20 4:02 PM, Tom Beecher wrote: My recommendation would be not to bother. :) Just encode the router loopback IPv4 address in the system identifier bytes and call it a day. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:55 AM JASON BOTHE via NANOG > wrote: Does anyone have

AS27594 / UTSA contact?

Howdy ... if anyone from University of Texas, San Antonio (AS27594) is lurking, could you please reach out to me off-list? We have a mutual reachability problem through an IX in Dallas. Thanks!

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

We hit over 40G on one of our PNIs. Currently, however, I'm trying to figure out why we're still seeing a significant amount of traffic over transit when we have PNIs at the same locations ... I've reached out to Akamai, but I haven't heard anything back yet. I'm sure they're busy ... On

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

On 3/9/20 11:02 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote: Warzone is a 83-101GB download for new, free-to-play users*. And I remember the days when that would have taken 10 and a half years to download and consumed 56,000 floppy diskettes. My, how times have changed! "Never underestimate the bandwidth

Re: Chairman Pai Proposes Mandating STIR/SHAKEN To Combat Robocalls

On 3/7/20 8:03 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 11:05 PM Brian J. Murrell wrote: So, if my telco can bill the callers for those premium calls, they surely know who they are, or at least know where they are sending the bill and getting payment from. You are mistaken,

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Is 10G enough? ;) We just lit up several 100G Akamai links. Saved the day fo sho ... (this time.) On 2/11/20 8:26 PM, Aaron Gould wrote: Huge!  Big as ever.  My aanp links are (were) pegged, seriously.  I will be contacting Akamai about lighting up an additional 10 gig link to my local

Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Whoa. Gandalf. I worked on one of those once and it was cray-zee. Customer bought one, and I had to get it to interoperate with an Ascend 400. It took a lot of fiddle-farting, but I did eventually get it to work. Fun times. On 1/27/20 8:00 PM, Jamie Bowden via NANOG wrote: That was

Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

... and disabling call-waiting ... ;) On 1/27/20 1:55 PM, John Von Essen wrote: In those early days I remember setting up a download to start before bed so it could run all night, then wake up the morning to see my freshly downloaded 300KB file — assuming the phone line remained stable.

Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

On 1/27/20 1:42 PM, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote: On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 12:13, Rob Pickering > wrote: Wasn't the 56/64k thing a result of CAS (bit robbed) signalling which was a fudge AT did to transport signalling information in-band on T1s by stealing

Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

I didn't think one could get a single 'B' channel over ISDN ... but I could be mistaken. In my early ISP days, ISDN was 2 x 64k (full-rate) 'B' channels and a 16k 'D' channel for signaling. On 1/26/20 5:58 AM, Joly MacFie wrote: IIRC that 64k was in fact 56k with 8k for overhead. I had

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

This echoed events a month or so ago, and I'm curious as to what is making these releases more, uh, network-impacting. Game releases are hardly a new thing, but these last two events seem to be almost an order of magnitude higher than what we're used to (at least on our predominantly eyeball

Re: Software Defined Networks

On 12/5/19 6:16 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: I tell everyone we had SDNs in the 90s. But we called it “expect scripts”. :-) -- TTFN, patrick I miss TCL ...

Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai

On 12/5/19 8:48 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 19:05 Kaiser, Erich > wrote: Lets talk Akamai [...] The last two nights the traffic levels to them has skyrocketed as well. Any insight? Erich Kaiser The Fusion Network

Re: AS12042 contact?

On 11/25/19 8:50 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: If there's anyone from Consolidated (legacy Enventis) lurking, could you please reach out to me off-list? You're advertising a prefix from a Tier 1 to another Tier 1 which is causing occasional issues for us. E-mails to noc@ and repair@ have gone

AS12042 contact?

If there's anyone from Consolidated (legacy Enventis) lurking, could you please reach out to me off-list? You're advertising a prefix from a Tier 1 to another Tier 1 which is causing occasional issues for us. E-mails to noc@ and repair@ have gone unanswered (and admittedly I'm not a direct

Re: Disney+ Streaming

On 11/13/19 1:06 PM, Niels Bakker wrote: * mikeboli...@gmail.com (Mike Bolitho) [Wed 13 Nov 2019, 12:05 CET]: This has gone well beyond out of scope of the NANOG list. Discussing who watches what kind of content has nothing to do with networking. Can you guys take the conversation elsewhere?

Re: Twitter contact?

Someone has reached out; I’m good! > On Oct 21, 2019, at 13:54, Bryan Holloway wrote: > > Anyone from Twitter lurking? Trying to resolve a peering issue and not > getting far through published contacts. > > Thanks! >- bryan

Twitter contact?

Anyone from Twitter lurking? Trying to resolve a peering issue and not getting far through published contacts. Thanks! - bryan

Re: sfps from fs dot com

It boils down to a business case. In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it can be a "successful" business model. In a nutshell: For someone on a budget, they're great; buy

Re: sfps from fs dot com

On 9/20/19 2:31 PM, Nicholas Warren wrote: Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? YMMV.

Re: rr.level3.net on autopilot?

AS1, baby!! On 9/6/19 1:45 AM, Bryan Fields wrote: On 9/5/19 2:05 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: I was doing some IRR clean-up and after a few successful updates, I'm no longer able to alter or delete our objects in rr.level3.com. Emails to r...@level3.com result in no action and no response. I've

Re: MAP-E

On 8/2/19 5:16 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: Multiple customers share an IPv4 address each with an assigned port range. One downside that has been brought up on the list before is that a DDoS attack against a single subscriber will impact many, but that particular drawback may not

Re: Phoenix IX down/gone?

On 8/2/19 3:29 AM, Brandon Wade via NANOG wrote: Corrected URL: https://peeringdb.com/ix/662 Anyone know what happened to Phoenix IX? https://peeringdb.com/ix/66 They seem off the air including website and phones.. permanently? -PeterK at 32354

Re: Intermittent "bad gateway"

Maybe Verizon can blog about it. On 7/2/19 9:35 AM, Ryan Hagman wrote: https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/incidents/tx4pgxs6zxdr One hell of a fall. On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:33 AM Michael Rathbun > wrote: On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 07:16:36 -0700, Stephen Satchell

Re: few big monolithic PEs vs many small PEs

On 6/21/19 10:01 AM, Aaron Gould wrote: I was reading this and thought, planet earth is a single point of failure. ...but, I guess we build and design and connect as much redundancy (logic, hw, sw, power) as the customer requires and pays for and that we can truly accomplish. -Aaron

Re: CenturyLink/Level3 feedback

On 6/5/19 3:40 PM, Dovid Bender wrote: If the FCC has their way the only place you will see the PSTN in history books. I can only hope that the same happens to faxing. I'm told that the one of the only reasons faxing is still a thing is because of HIPAA-compliance.

Re: DOs and DONTs for small ISP

On 6/4/19 9:20 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 3/Jun/19 15:41, Fletcher Kittredge wrote: Here is your checklist in descending order of importance: 1. market opportunity 2. finding the right partners (see below) 3. financial 4. sales and marketing 5. organizational capacity and HR 6. legal,

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

Anybody else noticed a significant uptick in these e-mails? When I first saw this thread, I hadn't seen any. A couple days later, I got my first one. (yay!) Now I'm getting 2-3 a day. (yay?)

Re: NTP for ASBRs?

On 5/8/19 10:15 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote: On 5/8/19 7:55 PM, Brian Kantor wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:47:56PM -0500, Bryan Holloway wrote: 100% true. But there is also a practical side to this ... When a NOC-ling, in their own local timezone, says, "hey, what happened two hour

Re: NTP for ASBRs?

On 5/8/19 7:55 PM, Brian Kantor wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:47:56PM -0500, Bryan Holloway wrote: 100% true. But there is also a practical side to this ... When a NOC-ling, in their own local timezone, says, "hey, what happened two hours ago?", they have to make a c

Re: NTP for ASBRs?

On 5/8/19 6:54 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- br...@shout.net wrote: From: Bryan Holloway On 5/8/19 4:00 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- j...@ntt.net wrote: From: Job Snijders on this topic, i strongly recommend to operate all devices in the Etc/UTC timezone, this makes coordination with external

Re: NTP for ASBRs?

On 5/8/19 4:00 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- j...@ntt.net wrote: From: Job Snijders on this topic, i strongly recommend to operate all devices in the Etc/UTC timezone, this makes coordination with external entities much easier. Yes, this! Holy crap I

Re: looking for hostname router identifier validation

On 4/29/19 7:21 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:16:06 -0500, Bryan Holloway said: I still see references to UUNet in some reverse PTRs. So, uh, yeah. I wonder what year we'll get to a point where less than half of NANOG's membership was around when UUNet was. We're

  1   2   >