On 18 Oct 2023, at 19:49, Adam Thompson wrote:
Sightline *Insight* is the piece the sales team won't sell me, and TAC won't
support me, for deployment in our private-cloud environment
Insight isn’t used for first-order DDoS
detection/classification/traceback/mitigation; Sightline/TMS
I remember some time back Juniper had a feature that would listen to snmp? from
the radios and adjust ospf cost. My search foo is failing right now but I think
they had a paper on the topic also.
On Oct 18, 2023, at 6:13 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
Using a mix of Juniper hardware...
Network
Anyone from Google that could help get us isp portal access? We're directly
period with Google but continually get denied portal access. Ticket
72617.
Thank you in advance,
TJ Trout
Volt Broadband
-- Forwarded message -
From: TJ Trout
Date: Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 6:06 AM
It _is_ interesting that this was an IPv4 black market crime. Think of all the
smaller black marketeers dealing in IPv4 trafficking.
-mel via cell
> On Oct 17, 2023, at 10:09 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Sadly, probably not. AUP violations are a civil, not a criminal matter.
> Fraud, OTOH,
We have been hoping to find use cases for the babel protocol's rtt
metric, which builds on ideas from ntp, and is primarily used today in
overlay networks:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension/
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:17 AM Jason R. Rokeach via NANOG
wrote:
>
> Hi
Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned,
is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's
effectively a 500M link.
Theoretically, you could have some sort of automation in
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:38 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
> stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned, is
> a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's effectively a
> 500M
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher wrote:
> Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
> stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned, is
> a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's effectively a
> 500M
Hi Adam,
This sounds like a use case for MPLS-TE with TWAMP-Light. TWAMP-Light handles
the latency concern and can encode your measured latency in IS-IS. Juniper
docs:
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/is-is/topics/topic-map/enable-link-delay-advertise-in-is-is.html.
Depending on the network size, an IX or PNI are typically more
beneficial as you'll gain access to a larger footprint of different Akamai
deployments types.
Akamai continues to support an open peering policy at Internet Exchanges,
so please reach out to peering-...@akamai.com and a member of the
Using a mix of Juniper hardware...
Network provides VPLS to customer, over MPLS (obviously) in a
dual-redundant-ring radio topology. Each site is connected to one or more
neighbors, generally with two radios, in two different bands, to *each*
neighbor. So an ordinary node might have 4
Sorry for the late reply... Sightline *Insight* is the piece the sales team
won't sell me, and TAC won't support me, for deployment in our private-cloud
environment: it has to be hosted on one of 3 canned server configurations.
I am using Sightline/TMS virtually and it's fine there.
-Adam
In addition to RSVP or may be worth using minimum modulation settings on
the radios if possible. IE so that links completely drop and you re-route
rather than run with less bandwidth.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 6:34 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking
We (AperNet) have an open-source anti-ddos flow monitor called apermon
that provides some interesting capabilities.
https://github.com/apernet/apermon
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:51 AM Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late reply... Sightline *Insight* is the piece the sales team
> won't
>
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
>
I would agree.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> > Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
> stated in the first
That's not a good option for bad weather depending on the region. Rain fade and
other effects at 24Ghz and above can hinder a set of links, which is sometimes
better than having no links at all. The encoding and error correcting
capabilities play a crucial part in having a good connection.
16 matches
Mail list logo
