suggestions.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:11:59PM +, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
List of CDNs would be difficult, but not impossible. Although they do
different things, so a simple list is unlikely to be as useful as it looks.
A lost of CDN DC nodes is not possible. Why
:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
List of CDNs would be difficult, but not impossible. Although they do
different things, so a simple list is unlikely to be as useful as it looks.
A lost of CDN DC nodes is not possible. Why do you care about such a
thing anyway?
signature.asc
, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
First, the location of CDN nodes is not relevant to passive DNS monitoring.
If Andrew would like a list of domains with CDN hostnames in them, that
might be findable.
Second, a list of CDN nodes is likely impossible to gather
On Nov 16, 2013, at 19:36 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Second, a list of CDN nodes is likely impossible to gather maintain
without the help of the CDNs themselves. There are literally thousands
of them, most do not serve the entire Internet, and they change
frequently. And before
List of CDNs would be difficult, but not impossible. Although they do different
things, so a simple list is unlikely to be as useful as it looks.
A lost of CDN DC nodes is not possible. Why do you care about such a thing
anyway?
--
TTFN,
patrick
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please
It's not a fiber cut. It did come back for a while at least.
https://twitter.com/akamai_soti/status/382872513761398785/photo/1
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Sep 25, 2013, at 21:03 , Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
wrote:
On 13-09-25 20:43, Warren Bailey wrote:
We make
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
On Sep 19, 2013, at 13:58, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote:
Can someone please explain to a non-Apple person what the hell happened
that started generating so much traffic? Perhaps I missed it in this
thread, but I would be
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
On Sep 19, 2013, at 14:11, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
I don't see how operators could tolerate this, honestly. I can't think of a
single provider who does not oversubscribe their access platform... Which
On Sep 17, 2013, at 07:02 , Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/09/2013 11:52, Martin T wrote:
Is there a common method to count this traffic on a switch-fabric?
Just read all the switch interface packets input counters with an
interval to get the aggregated input traffic and read all
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:04 , Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/09/2013 14:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
And yes, DE-CIX is more than well aware everyone thinks this is .. uh ..
let's just call it silly for now, although most would use far more
disparaging words. Which is probably why
their traffic would be with a 300 second timer.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On 9/17/13, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 17/09/2013 14:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
And yes, DE-CIX is more than well aware everyone thinks this is .. uh ..
let's just call it silly for now, although most would use far more
On Sep 03, 2013, at 09:58 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
From: Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is another bit of data... www.apple.com not reachable from a
machine
using Google's NS, reachable from an
On Sep 03, 2013, at 02:41 , Scott Hulbert sc...@scotthulbert.com wrote:
Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
Why not just use the TWC nameservers,
if thiings work when you use them instead
of the Google nameservers?
One reason would be that TWC used to hijack failed DNS requests
On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:42 , Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
Without Google, how do you know where anything even *is*?
Pretending that wasn't a troll, I wonder how much of the traffic these days is
things like AppleTV, Roku, OS updates, iThing/Android 'Apps', etc. that do not
require a
On Aug 15, 2013, at 10:05 , Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Once you define what you mean by how bit is the Internet, I'll be happy to
spout off about how big it is. :)
Arbitrary definition time: A Internet host
On Aug 16, 2013, at 00:37 , Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Seth Mattinen wrote:
We'll also need this data in units of number of Libraries of Congress.
The researchers at the Library of Congress are more than happy to explain why
you are wrong to attempt to use
On Aug 14, 2013, at 15:00 , Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
I should have remembered, NANOG prefers to correct things. So here are
several estimates about how much IP/Internet traffic is downloaded
in a month. Does anyone have better numbers, or better souces of
numbers that can be
On Aug 15, 2013, at 00:19 , Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
It is actually even harder than the above illustrates. Most people define
Mbps on the Internet as inter-AS bits. But then what about Akamai AANP
nodes, Google GGC nodes, Netflix
On Aug 02, 2013, at 09:37 , sgr...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
I’m curious to know what other service providers are doing to
alleviate/prevent ddos attacks from happening in your network. Are you
completely reactive and block as many addresses as possible or null0 traffic
to the effected
On Jul 31, 2013, at 20:00 , Mark Tees markt...@gmail.com wrote:
I remember reading a while back that customers of nLayer IP transit
services could send in Flowspec rules to nLayer. Anyone know if that is
true/current?
Not any more.
--
TTFN,
patrick
signature.asc
Description: Message
On Jul 25, 2013, at 19:29 , Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of maintaining the whois?
Yep!
We registered a few domains and get the same thing, I think it's
something that
On Jul 26, 2013, at 09:32 , Ryan Pavely para...@nac.net wrote:
What about the 2am phone calls from the guy, who did a nslookup on a website,
and then whois on the ip, who is calling to say his porn site is partially
not working and he's pissed.
imho. The days of having public records
On Jul 26, 2013, at 11:05 , David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
On Jul 26, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
You can change anything you want. ARIN ICANN are both member
organizations. Propose a change, get the votes, and POOF!, things are
changed.
Err
:
-Original Message-
From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patr...@ianai.net]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:47 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: ARIN WHOIS for leads
On Jul 25, 2013, at 19:29 , Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com
wrote:
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai
On Jul 26, 2013, at 12:54 , Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net wrote:
Case in point.. And I'm going to name drop, but do not consider this a shame.
I have been looking at various filtering technologies, and was looking at
Barracudas site. I went on with my day, but noticed that filtering
On Jul 12, 2013, at 19:22 , Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Set up your own email server, host your own web pages, maintain your own
cloud, breath your own oxygen FTW.
That's simply not realistic for many companies and essentially all people (to a
first approximation).
--
TTFN,
patrick
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
On Jul 12, 2013, at 13:25, na...@namor.ca wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Alain Hebert wrote:
Is it me or the bigger a corporation gets the more vindictive (a b-word
intended) they are to customers leaving them?
Never attribute to malice
On Jul 12, 2013, at 13:44 , Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 7/12/13 1:39 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Put another way, whether it was stupid or evil, the results are the same.
Turning off a customer in good standing is actionable in court, and should
be avoided by legitimate
On Jun 22, 2013, at 16:16 , Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl wrote:
On 22-06-13 17:30, Owen DeLong wrote:
Looking at the number of autonomous systems in the IPv6 routing table and
the total number of routes, it looks like it will shake out somewhere in the
neighborhood of 3-5
On Jun 24, 2013, at 13:29 , Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン) r...@witbe.net wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:56:02 -0600 Michael McConnell
mich...@winkstreaming.com wrote:
As the IPv4 space get smaller and smaller, does anyone think we'll see a
time when /25's will be accepted for global BGP prefix
On Jun 20, 2013, at 01:30 , Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
Yelp is evidently also affected
Not from here.
If the NS or www points to 204.11.56.0/24 for a production domain/hostname,
that's bad. Yelp seems to be resolving normally for me.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013
On Jun 17, 2013, at 00:36 , Otis L. Surratt, Jr. o...@ocosa.com wrote:
Any idea why more companies don't offer eBGP peering / multi hop
peering? Its very common for providers to offer single or double hop
peering, so why not 5 or 10 hops? In many cases people find it logical
to perform single
On Jun 13, 2013, at 12:18 , Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
A local clec here in Canada just teamed up with this company to
provide cell service to the north:
http://cwta.ca/blog/2012/09/24/ice-wireless-iristel-and-huawei-partner-for-3g-wireless-network-in-northern-canada/
Scary
or
something that is magically messaged from the mother ship, but I am dubious.
It should be trivial to prove to yourself the box is, or is not, doing
something evil if you actually try.
--
TTFN,
patrick
--Original Message--
From: Patrick W. Gilmore
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: huawei
Sent
however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from
site b..
This is probably incorrect.
The providers are almost certainly sending you the prefixes, but your router is
dropping them due to loop detection. To answer your later question, this is the
definition of 'standard' as it
On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:54 , Joe Provo nanog-p...@rsuc.gweep.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0500, Dennis Burgess wrote:
I have a network that has three peers, two are at one site and the third
is geographically diverse, and there is NO connection between the two
separate
On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:36 , Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from
site b..
This is probably incorrect.
The providers are almost certainly sending you the prefixes, but your
router
On Jun 10, 2013, at 14:07 , Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:36 , Bruce Pinsky b...@whack.org wrote:
Or maintain standard behavior by running a GRE tunnel between the two
discontinuous sites and run iBGP over the tunnel.
Standard how
On Jun 10, 2013, at 14:14 , Joe Provo nanog-p...@rsuc.gweep.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:18:04PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 10, 2013, at 12:54 , Joe Provo nanog-p...@rsuc.gweep.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0500, Dennis Burgess wrote:
I have a network
On Jun 10, 2013, at 15:23 , Job Snijders job.snijd...@atrato.com wrote:
The alternative is to expect networks with 100s or 1000s of locations to
burn 100s or 1000s of ASNs. Which I think is a bit silly. Hence my question
about possibly changing the rules.
I see no issue with that, we have
As the whoami.akamai.net hostname came up on the list, I thought I'd mention it
here.
The hostname 'whoami.akamai.com' is a CNAME for whoami.akamai.net. That CNAME
is, frankly, a mistake. It will be removed soon. If you are using the .com
name, please move to the .net name.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On May 14, 2013, at 13:06 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Or I don't. Which is not completely impossible.
In this piece:
http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/netflix-puts-even-more-strain-on-the-internet-1200480561/
they suggest that Akamai and other ISP-side caching is
On May 14, 2013, at 15:53 , Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
wrote:
On 13-05-14 13:06, Jay Ashworth wrote:
http://variety.com/2013/digital/news/netflix-puts-even-more-strain-on-the-internet-1200480561/
they suggest that Akamai and other ISP-side caching is either not
On May 14, 2013, at 21:14 , Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
wrote:
On 13-05-14 20:55, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Since when is peering not part of the Internet?
Yes, one car argue that an device with an IP address routable from the
internet is part of the internet.
Can
On May 02, 2013, at 12:12 , Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2013-05-02, at 12:10, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2013-05-02, at 11:59, Charles Gucker cguc...@onesc.net wrote:
That's not entirely true.You can easily do lookup for
whoami.akamai.net and it will return the
On May 02, 2013, at 14:42 , Constantine A. Murenin muren...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 11:12, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
For clarity: Looking up the hostname whoami.akamai.net will return the IP
address in the source field of the packet (DNS query) which reached
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:07 , Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in
On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:23 , Thomas Schmid sch...@dfn.de wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
2) Prefix filter
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
On Apr 30, 2013, at 12:32, Thomas Schmid sch...@dfn.de wrote:
Am 30.04.2013 17:53, schrieb Patrick W. Gilmore:
Core? Seriously? Which of these statements are true: A) Is it impossible
for an end user or business (i.e. non-ISP) to get
On Apr 26, 2013, at 00:19 , joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question[1], which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
networks:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to cater
to the fact that HTTPS
On Apr 01, 2013, at 11:55 , Milt Aitken m...@net2atlanta.com wrote:
Most of our DSL customers have modem/routers that resolve DNS
externally.
And most of those have no configuration option to stop it.
So, we took the unfortunate step of ACL blocking DNS requests to from
the DSL network
On Apr 01, 2013, at 12:09 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
You can always make an exception if the user is extremely loud.
It might be a good idea to make pinholes for the Google and OpenDNS
recursors, as they're fairly
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
On Mar 26, 2013, at 18:27, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
The whole point of this thread is that dns amplification hurts other people,
not the resolver which is being abused.
On Mar 26, 2013, at 08:01 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
let's suppose I just happen to have, or have access to, a botnet comprised
of (tens of) millions of random hosts all over the internet, and I feel like
destroying your DNS
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:38 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
From: Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
b) locking down your recursive servers to networks you control
Sure. But OpenDNS, Google, and the other providers of recursive servers
for edge cases can't do that anymore?
I wish
On Mar 05, 2013, at 13:41 , Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
In-line
Isn't every reply? (Well, every reply worth reading.)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Mukom Akong T. mukom.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear experts,
I've found myself thinking about what ground an engineer needs to
On Mar 04, 2013, at 09:51 , Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
Any competent network admin would have stopped and questioned a
90,000+ byte packet and done more investigation. Competent programmers
writing their internal tools would have flagged that data as out
of rage.
The last couple
On Feb 12, 2013, at 01:06 , Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 02/11/2013 03:52 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
One of us has a different dictionary than everyone else.
I'm not sure it's different dictionaries, I think you're talking past each
other.
No, it's definitely different
On Feb 11, 2013, at 14:11 , Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org wrote:
On 11-Feb-13 12:25, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 2/11/13 9:32 AM, ML wrote:
Any eyeball network that wants to support multicast should peer with
the content players(s) that support it. Simple!
Just another reason to make the
On Feb 11, 2013, at 18:52 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 14:11 , Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org wrote:
Multicast _is_ useful for filling the millions of DVRs out there with
broadcast programs and for live events (eg. sports). A smart VOD system
would
On Feb 04, 2013, at 09:03 , Kyle Camilleri kyle.camill...@melitaplc.com wrote:
Some CDN providers such as Akamai and Google (often called Global Google
Cache) are offering caches to ISPs. It is very convenient for small ISPs to
alleviate bandwidth towards the provider, but also the CDN
On Feb 01, 2013, at 10:02 , Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote:
Akamai (CDN) does scrubbing???
http://www.akamai.com/html/solutions/kona-solutions.html
I'm sure there are other things Akamai does in the security sector as well.
--
TTFN,
patrick
-Original Message-
From:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
I work at a datacenter in southern Colorado that is the upstream bandwidth
provider for several regional ISPs. We have been investigating our
ever-growing bandwidth usage and have found that out of transits
(Level3,Cogent,HE) that
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
wrote:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
I work at a datacenter in southern Colorado that is the upstream bandwidth
provider for several regional ISPs. We have been investigating our
,
patrick
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:54 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:46 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
Thanks for your prompt response. Yes, we are trying to determine where/how
we receive it ... not necessarily influence it, as there isn't so much we
can
On Dec 08, 2012, at 21:14 , Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dan Luedtke m...@danrl.de wrote:
Off-topic but somehow important to me:
HE has an open-peering policy (AFAIK);
which basically means that tunnelbroker.net traffic is free for
hetzner.de
On Nov 30, 2012, at 20:25 , Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Not a lawyer.
than stfu with the legal crap
It amazes me how people feel free to opine on things like networking without a
certification, but if you don't have a law degree, suddenly they believe you
are incapable of understanding
On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:17 , Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Back in the early days of the public internet we didn't require any id
to create an account, just that you found a way to pay us. We had
anonymous accts some of whom dropped by personally to pay their bill,
some said hello but
On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:58 , Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
On November 29, 2012 at 11:45 patr...@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore) wrote:
On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:17 , Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
It's funny, it's all illusion like show business. It's not hard to set
up anonymous
On Nov 29, 2012, at 13:57 , William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
wrote:
Do you think if the police found out child pr0n was
being served from a starbux they wouldn't
confiscate the equipment from that store?
I think
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/
This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet
On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:42 , Mike Jones m...@mikejones.in wrote:
On 20 November 2012 16:05, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons
On Nov 20, 2012, at 14:44 , Tony Hain alh-i...@tndh.net wrote:
If you assume that Youtube/Facebook/Netflix are 50% of the overall traffic,
why wouldn't a dual stacked end point have half of its traffic as IPv6 after
June???
If you assume Kinda says it all right there.
But more
On Nov 19, 2012, at 03:05 , Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2012-11-18 23:47 +0100), Daniel Suchy wrote:
Is anyone else seeing similar problems with Google/Youtube?
My advice is, host the content locally.
Sound advice, IMHO.
I'm bit curious about market position youtube has. GOOG
On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:16 , Jamie Bowden ja...@photon.com wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canada
counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited by folks who
don't speak much, if any, English. Having said that, I can't recall
On Nov 06, 2012, at 23:48 , Jian Gu guxiaoj...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google does not
want Moratel to advertise its routes to Moratel's peers/upstreams, then
Google should've set the correct BGP attributes in the first place.
That doesn't
this?
Hint: Don't say No-Advertise, unless you want peers to only talk to the
adjacent AS, not their customers or their customers' customers, etc.
Looking forward to your answer.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote:
On Nov 06, 2012, at 23:48
on
them! (Does that have any effect any more? :)
Oh, and we are still waiting for an answer: Which attribute do you think Google
could have used to stop this?
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.netwrote:
On Nov 07, 2012, at 00:07 , Jian Gu
?
educate me, Google is announcing /24 for all of their 4 NS prefix and
8.8.8.0/24 for their public DNS server, how did Moratel leak those routes
to Internet?
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
wrote:
On Nov 07, 2012, at 00:07 , Jian Gu guxiaoj
Everyone:
NANOG elections open tomorrow.
Please consider standing for one of the committees, or nominating someone for
the committees. Remember, committee members get free registration to every
NANOG meeting! The only requirement is a willingness to contribute to the
community, and being a
On Sep 27, 2012, at 11:34 , Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:58AM -0600, Miguel Mata mm...@intercom.com.sv
wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
Guys,
No gals on NANOG?
Many. Although in fairness, some people use guys in a gender-neutral
On Sep 20, 2012, at 00:19 , Jack Hamm jackha...@me.com wrote:
I'm not a lawyer, but in section 18.1:
(a) beach of the director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to NANOG;
I believe that is meant to say (a) breach of the
If it were a beach, I may run again
=)
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Sep 11, 2012, at 16:04 , Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Damian Menscher dam...@google.com wrote:
Summary: 30 minutes late on the start time, and off by well over an hour on
the stop time.
even a broken clock is right 2x/day?
On Sep 11, 2012, at 17:04 , ryanL ryan.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
when patrick is referring to taking their word for it, he's referring to a
post on outages@ by godaddy's network engineering manager that stated bgp,
and more details to follow.
Well, mostly I'm taking GoDaddy at their word that
On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:58, virendra rode virendra.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/25/2012 11:36 AM, Jason Baugher wrote:
On 8/24/2012 11:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
You mean outages@...
chris, this is not productive. outages are a very apt subject
for nanog.
I'm actually not certain posting
Just as a follow up, leaving my driveway this morning, the tech was installing
a new pedestal. Said everything should be fixed today.
Comcast++
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Aug 20, 2012, at 17:22 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Comcast has already contacted me to fix this up
While I hesitate to argue DNS with Mark, I feel this needs a response.
On Aug 19, 2012, at 17:37 , Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message ddf607b5-415b-41e8-9222-eb549d3db...@semihuman.com, Chris
Woodfield writes:
What Patrick said. For large sites that offer services in multiple data
On Aug 20, 2012, at 06:49 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
But I do not think returning multiple A records for multiple datacenters is
as useful as lowering the TTL.
Some folks do this via various GSLB mechanisms which
On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Aug 19, 2012, at 17:37 , Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Which is why the DNS supports multiple address records. Clients
don't have to wait a minutes to fallover to a second address
On Aug 20, 2012, at 08:47 , Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net said:
* How many applications are even aware multiple addresses were returned?
Most anything that supports IPv6 should handle this correctly, since
getaddrinfo
On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:07 , Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
My question above is asking Mark how you guarantee the user/application
selects the A record closest to them and only use the other A record when
the closer one
Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap
Internet.
The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new
underground cable. They decided it was better to do it arial (if you can
call 2 feet arial). They took apart the two pedestals on
On Aug 20, 2012, at 16:25 , Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
In a message written on Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:12:22PM -0400, Patrick W.
Gilmore wrote:
The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs didn't pull new
underground cable. They decided it was better to do
Comcast has already contacted me to fix this up.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Aug 20, 2012, at 16:12 , Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap
Internet.
The story: A piece of underground cable went bad. The techs
On Aug 18, 2012, at 5:35, Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net wrote:
Reverse DNS isnt the only issue here. There are many sites that give each
user a subdomain. And if i look at my top talkers on some busy resolvers i do
see that thats doing about 25-30% of the lookups currently.
[Feels operational to me.]
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/260299/us_house_to_itu_hands_off_the_internet.html
The U.S. House of Representatives voted late Thursday to send a message to the
United Nations' International Telecommunication Union that the Internet doesn't
need new
I'm sorry Panashe is upset by this rule. Interestingly, Your search - Panashe
Flack nanog - did not match any documents. So my guess is that a post from
that account has not happened before, meaning the post was moderated yet still
made it through.
Has anyone done a data mining experiment to
On Jul 30, 2012, at 16:35 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
thanks MLC or whatever it calls itself this week
C'mon, Randy; It's been called that since it kicked me off 7 years ago. :-)
Except, of course, it has been called the Communications Committee for a while
now. (The change was
On Jul 20, 2012, at 16:10 , Darius Jahandarie wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:04 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
So, whatever happened to that whole the internet will catch fire when
we get to 280K routing table entries or whatever it was? :)
But what will happen when we have
On Jul 13, 2012, at 14:20 , JC Dill wrote:
On 13/07/12 10:46 AM, Grant Ridder wrote:
if the admins are not going to moderate this list... give me the admin
password to the list serve and i will set it up right... gees
+1
Most excellent!
Just so you know, the admins are the Communications
201 - 300 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
