Hi Charles,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hello,
Looking at the current state, I think it's too difficult to maintain support
for all of the .NET frameworks. Can we drop support for .NET 1.x and
beginning beginning .NET 2.0 as a
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please
excuse me for the quick answers.
Gert:
Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong)
Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hello Matt,
Great stuff! I think a lot of people would love to see VS2005 and VS2008
support in NAnt as well! (Based on what I have seen in the bug feature
request section.) Let's get 0.8x and 1.0 out
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I have posted a preliminary roadmap for NAnt up on MediaWiki. You can find it
on:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/nant/index.php?title=Roadmap
This is by no means final -- I prefer look at it as a
Hi,
When someone includes another build file through the includetask,
should the included build file inherit the main build file project
attributes (ie: the xmlns) or should they be independent of each
other?
--
Thanks,
Ryan
Hey,
I'm building NAnt from source on my Mac and it keeps dragging during
the userdoc target and was wondering if there was a way to get around
that? It's the longest part of the build and it eats up alot of time
when someone is trying to test. Thanks in advance
--
Thanks,
Ryan
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
From what I have seen so far on the mailing list, it looks like most people
are happy with the roadmap at this time. Let's stay focus for the short
term, and we can revise the roadmap as we go along. :)
Thanks for the pointer. I was using what was in the README.txt file
which only lists the install command.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 02.03.2010 07:30, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hey,
I'm building NAnt from source on my Mac and it keeps
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 28.02.2010 00:38, schrieb Charles Chan:
I have posted a preliminary roadmap for NAnt up on MediaWiki. You can find
it on:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/nant/index.php?title=Roadmap
This is by no means final
Hey all,
Has anyone had any success build Visual C++ projects with NAnt lately?
I ask because I am trying to look into bug 1599921 but I can't get
VC++ to work properly. I keep getting errors about missing cl
options. It may be my config since I don't work with C++ often but I
thought I would
Sure, give me 10 minutes to give it a go...
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hello Ryan,
The good news is that after I install Mono, I am now able
to reproduce it. So the fix should not be far behind. :)
I have checked the fix into the CVS
It's currently stuck on the userdoc portion of the build on my Debian
Test box but the rest of the build went without a hitch. Looks like
you squashed this bug. Good job.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, give me 10 minutes
:51 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Yes!
At least I know my setup is working correctly (Windows + NMake + Mono 2.4.3).
I will close the issue as well.
Thanks for helping out.
Charles
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ryan Boggs
to Mono dev team as well
and see if they can provide any guidance.
Regards,
Charles
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Gert Driesen gert.drie...@telenet.be wrote:
From: Gert Driesen gert.drie...@telenet.be
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release
To: cchan...@users.sourceforge.net, 'Ryan
this makes sense.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just so I am clear, the userdoc section is just generating the code
documentation via NDoc, correct?
If so, I will see if installing NDoc on my machines will speed things up. I
Hmm, it looks like it can't find System.Data.dll. Is it in /usr/lib/mono?
Did you upgrade the default Mono installation or did you upgrade?
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I tried to test NAnt on Ubuntu 9.10 and got the following
System.Web.Routing.dll
System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.dll System.Web.Services.dll
System.Configuration.dll System.Xml.dll
System.Configuration.Install.dll System.Xml.Linq.dll
System.Core.dll
--- On Fri, 3/5/10, Ryan Boggs
be to make install-windows depend only on build and
then call userdoc within that target. It's not the best patch, more
of a band-aid. What do you think?
Regards,
Charles
--- On Fri, 3/5/10, Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com
Subject
to look into this further.
Regards,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: vrijdag 5 maart 2010 4:26
To: Ryan Boggs
Cc: Gert Driesen; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Task/planning for 0.87 release
program for building docs cross platform. There is
NDoc3 but I am not sure it is active anymore. There is doxygen but I
am not sure if it can do VB.NET or other non-C# languages. Etc, etc.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com]
Sent: zaterdag 6
understanding.
Thanks in advance,
Ryan
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Gert Driesen gert.drie...@telenet.be wrote:
Hi Ryan,
That would be great.
We could also look for an alternative in parallel (as NDoc is no longer
maintained).
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 06.03.2010 22:38, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hey Gert,
Question regarding the NAnt.build file, in particular the userdoc
target. Could you help me understand why the self-userdoc target is
being called via the exec
Hi,
I agree with Charles. We should look into SCM's in the future but
address critical issues before hand.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hello Dominik,
At work, we also use SVN, and so I relate the benefits over CVS.
, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 06.03.2010 22:38, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hey Gert,
Question regarding the NAnt.build file, in particular the userdoc
target. Could you help me understand
Hi
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I am aware of those 2 choices as well. Can anyone provide more experience
about SharpDevelop?
Yes, I can. It is a very good open source alternative for developing
on the .NET platform that provides support
Hi,
I've been using Nano for my *nix system. I have syntax highlighting
for C# on Nano if anyone needs it and the xml file can be altered to
edit NAnt build files.
Let me know.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Great feedback
Hey guys,
I've been poking around the internals of NAnt for the past few days
trying to understand why it's been taking between 1600-1700 seconds to
build on my Mono/Linux system. Which is why I sent that small patch
last week. It wasn't to fix the problem but to allow others who are
working on
: NDoc
Discussion)
To: Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net
, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM
Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all
other documentation generators
hands down. It had
Discussion)
To: Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net
, nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Received: Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 7:51 AM
Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all
other documentation generators
hands down. It had
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 10.03.2010 05:45, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hey guys,
I've been poking around the internals of NAnt for the past few days
trying to understand why it's been taking between 1600-1700 seconds to
build on my Mono
Hi,
I just want to confirm that NAnt is currently licensed under the
GPLv2. It's not dual licensed with GPLv2 and LGPL or anything like
that, correct?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the
in the future or is that just not
possible at this point?
Thanks,
Ryan
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 16 maart 2010 2:53
To: gert.drie...@telenet.be; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: NAnt License
Hi,
I just want to confirm
Hi,
On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:34 AM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
On 64bit systems there are some environment variables which contains
parentheses like *ProgramFiles(x86)* or *CommonProgramFiles(x86)*.
This are invalid property names which cause the sysinfo tasks to
fail.
b) replace
--
From: Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:59 PM
To: Dominik Guder o...@guder.org
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task
Hi,
On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:34 AM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
On 64bit
Hi,
On Mar 25, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Brandt xtopher.bra...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is related to my previous post on Windows 7 VS2008.
After some help I realized that the target framework on my desktop
was .Net 3.5 whereas on my build server (Windows 2003 Server) it
was .Net
Actually, this is something that keeps coming up because of the way
Microsoft has been organizing the sdk directory structures since 3.0.
We have been just dealing with them as they come in so there may be
other reg keys out there that we don't know about yet.
Please keep these emails
Hi Richard,
On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Richard Birkby rbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats on releasing 0.9a1.
I immediately put it into our build process and found an issue -
unfortunately, I can't enter the issue into Nant's bug tracker
because a 0.9a1 tag is missing - any chance you
Hey Richard,
Would you mind giving the latest nightly file a try (04-02-2010)? We
believe that we were able to fix the output issue you experienced.
Let us know how it works for you.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Richard Birkby rbir...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats on releasing
Hi all,
Just wanted to let you all know that NAnt has a blog now. The link is below:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/nant/
Thanks,
Ryan
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for
Hi Jonathan,
That's the problem.
NAnt.Core.Filters.PhysicalTextReader is an Internal Class to that
Namespace. You are not going to get access to that Class in its
current state I'm afraid.
That said, I'm wondering if this should be changed in the future so
other projects could take advantage
Hey Martin,
What Linux are you running?
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Ryan
any suggestion as to where i can obtain mcs?
$ make
mkdir -p bootstrap
cp -R lib/ bootstrap/lib
# Mono loads log4net before privatebinpath is set-up, so
: gmcs, 4.x: dmcs).
Good thing NAnt build authors to not have to deal with this.
Martin, please submit a bug report for this.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 18 april 2010 3:27
To: Martin Gainty
Cc: nant-developers
that is available (1.x: mcs, 2.x: gmcs, 4.x: dmcs).
Good thing NAnt build authors to not have to deal with this.
Martin, please submit a bug report for this.
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 18 april 2010 3:27
To: Martin Gainty
Cc: nant
to improve
our makefile to support other (mono) compilers beside mcs.
Can you add this to our roadmap ?
Thanks!
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 18 april 2010 22:14
To: Martin Gainty
Cc: gert.drie...@telenet.be; nant-developers
Hi all,
Just wanted to let everyone know, we are still working hard behind the
scenes on NAnt 0.90 and expect the first Release Candidate (RC)
release this weekend. In the meantime, check out the NAnt blog when
you get a minute. You might find something interesting there. :)
Announcing NAnt 0.90-rc1
The first release candidate of NAnt 0.90 has been released. Please
continue to test and report bugs so we can make the final release of
0.90 the best it can be.
A roadmap has been created to help illustrate the current release
plan. Please note that this roadmap is a
We are proud to announce the final release of NAnt 0.90, the first
final release of NAnt in a VERY long time.
This release focuses on extending our already strong support for
multiple target frameworks, bringing improved flexibility and
performance. A number of outstanding issues have been fixed
Hi all,
If you haven't reviewed the NAnt blog lately, I wrote an entry to
request for volunteer for both NAnt and NAntContrib (especially). The
blog post is here:
https://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/nant/2010/05/24/a-call-to-arms/
As you can see, we are in need of help. As it stands right
Hey,
Yeah, that is the plan eventually. However, there currently is no ETA
at the moment. When we do decide to make the transition, it'll most
likely be in stages and we'll announce it once we start the process.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Nick Durcholz
Hey Guys,
How do you all feel about moving NAnt to git? Do you guys think that
it would be a welcome change?
Thanks,
Ryan
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R)
https://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/nant/2010/10/23/various-updates/
Thanks,
Ryan
--
Nokia and ATT present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in
Hi again,
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:19 AM, C. Mundi cmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I apologize if I missed something, but I did not find this definitively
addressed in the nant-dev archives. Pointers to clues will be graciously
accepted.
This post is motivated by my interest in getting NAnt
Hey Guys,
I just wanted to put a reminder out there that there is an IRC channel
for NAnt over on irc.freenode.net. The room name is #nant. I have
been trying to make it a habit of showing up here in an effort to keep
things going.
Thanks,
Ryan
Hi,
Just checking in real quick. I just merged the branch I was working
on into HEAD this evening. If everything goes well, I should start
kicking out more nightly releases by this weekend, if not before.
From there, I'll need to decide the future release schedule. Once it
is decided, it will
Where did u post your changes originally?
Thanks,
Ryan
On May 11, 2011, at 12:46 AM, Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz wrote:
I got same need and implemented that. But it never made its way to trunk
(posted atleast twice).
I'll repost all mine changes today or tommorow. There are known
FYI,
Just wanted to share this email I rec'd this morning. This issue in question
deals with .net 3.5 client profile builds on log4net which I briefly tried
looking at last fall. Looks like another solution has been suggested. Dunno
if it will go anywhere though. Here's to hoping.. :)
Hi,
I just performed a commit that should hopefully make building a bit
easier with your development with teamcity and other things. When I
was working on the 4.0 compatibility, I was testing the bootstrap on
4.0. This past commit should allow bootstrapping across the board.
Let me know if you
remember right.
Thanks,
Ryan
2011/5/18 Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz:
I do not see problem _targeting_ net-4.0-client Framework. No real need to
be hosted in that, imho.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 9:52
the Legacy binding (set it to false)
when the target is set to 4.0 or later.
I am interested in your approach. I'm particularly curious of how you
are using the extension methods.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 18.05.2011 01:48, schrieb Ryan
Hi,
See inline...
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 18.05.2011 22:27, schrieb Martin Aliger:
I do not see problem _targeting_ net-4.0-client Framework. No real need to
be hosted in that, imho.
Martin
Hi,
+1. IMHO we could require full .net 4.0
NLog would be a nice replacement. Even though 2.0 is still listed as
beta, it claims to support .net 2.0sp1 and up, including client
profiles. But again, it would have to wait until .net 1.* runtime
support is dropped from NAnt (nlog dropped support for .net 1.*
starting with the 2.0 release).
their implementation.
Richard
On 18 May 2011, at 23:26, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem isn't NAnt targeting net-4.0-client. The problem is that
one or more of NAnt's dependencies doesn't run well on the client
profile. For example, log4net depends on System.Web which isn't
included
Hi all,
This is regarding the cvs task in NAnt today. I want to run this by
everyone to get everyone's take before anything is done.
I am thinking about altering the cvs task to use the command line
programs rather than using it's current setup with sharpcvslib for a
couple of reasons:
*
Hi,
Any thoughts on this? I have a handful of diffs from Martin Aliger
that I would like you guys to review soon.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Since we are a group of more than 2, should we consider going back to
using the atlassian
Hi,
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 18:28, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hi,
Has anyone taken a look at the msbuild/vsnet changes that was posted here
last week? Please advise.
Thanks,
Ryan
Hi,
I'm trying to compile this but I have still
Hmm,
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 07.06.2011 01:53, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hi,
Martin seems good with the diff I posted. Has anyone else reviewed it
since I posted it last saturday? The link to the patch is below.
Yes, I did.
One point
Hi,
Just an update. I'm having issues with trying to process solution
files from .NET 2.0 and above with the solution task. I'm still
taking a look at it but it seems that the VS20** plugins in the
NAnt.MSBuild assembly are not being picked up by the solution task.
I'll keep checking...
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. Inline comments below.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 14.06.2011 05:14, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hi,
Just an update. I'm having issues with trying to process solution
files from .NET 2.0 and above with the solution task. I'm
Hi,
Please see inline.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:39 AM, Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz wrote:
Hi Ryan, sln file handling is some kind of broken since VS2005. They
only work with 2002/2003. I would not spend to much time for now in
sln file handling in VS2005 and up.
Eww,
explicitlly set OutputPath failed. (all mine test cases
got OutputPath set).
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 3:37 PM
To: Martin Aliger
Cc: Dominik Guder; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: ***SPAM
solutionTask,
TempFileCollection tfc, GacCache gacCache, ReferencesResolver refResolver,
DirectoryInfo outputDir)
...
ToolsVersion should be more accurate as well. I'd need to test it yet,
though.
Martin Aliger
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday
cluttered. It is CR-63.
https://fisheye1.atlassian.com/cru/CR-63
Please let me know if this looks good to commit to the tree.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thought I put in such a patch but it looks like I didn't yet. I will
see about
Anyone had a change to review this yet? Does it look ok to commit? Please
let me know.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated diff to include changes to the DetermineProductVersion method.
I decided that rather than relying on one element
testing.
Sound good?
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone had a change to review this yet? Does it look ok to commit? Please
let me know.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated diff
...@guder.org wrote:
Am 06.08.2011 21:12, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hi,
I'm thinking that at this point, since I believe I fixed the one or two
things from the comments I received some months ago, I will commit these
changes by end of day Monday unless I hear any objections before then.
From
Hi Dominik,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I started to setup a teamcity build task to automatically create nightlies.
That's wonderful. I'll take a look at that this weekend.
Everything went ok, but I struggled over ndoc and HtmlHelp
, ignore 'em all...
Thanks,
Ryan
On Sep 20, 2011 8:03 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Hi foks,
I need your input:
As you might know nant fileset has a bunch of default excludes.
I want to name mainly cvs and svn
We are proud to announce the first beta release of NAnt 0.91.
Many thanks to those who were involved with the development of NAnt
this past year. Especially to Martin Aliger and Dominik Guder without
whom this release would not have been possible without.
The primary goal for this release is to
Hi,
Thanks for your comments, see below.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Leszek Ciesielski skol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig
stefan.bode...@freenet.de wrote:
On 2011-10-26
said before, we probably need to update our contribution
instructions pretty soon after the repo decision is made.
Thanks,
Ryan
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com
To: Rob Richardson erobr...@yahoo.com
Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
nant
updates based on
some of the feedback so far. Please take a look...
https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/nant/index.php?title=TODO
Thanks,
Ryan
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Now that 0.91 final is out the door, I would like to start discussing
Hey Dominik,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Hi Ryan,
+1 for github.
How many responses should we collect before we make an official
decision on this? :)
And we should define/discus a contribution process to ensure that nant
core will stay as stable as
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Dominik Guder o...@guder.org wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 23:54, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
Hey Dominik,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dominik Gudero...@guder.org wrote:
Hi Ryan,
+1 for github.
How many responses should we collect before we make an official
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig
stefan.bode...@freenet.de wrote:
On 2011-10-26, Ryan Boggs wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig
stefan.bode...@freenet.de wrote:
Why do you feel Sourceforge's git offering was insufficient - this is
an honest question
Hi,
As a result of the feedback received these past few weeks, the
decision has been made to move development of the NAnt/NAntContrib
projects from sourceforge.net to github.com. Starting this week, we
will begin the process of converting the current sourceforge.net CVS
repository so it can be
,
Ryan
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I just wanted to remind everyone that we will be turning off write
access to both NAnt/NAntContrib cvs repositories at sourceforge.net in
preparation for the move. If anyone out there has any last minute
commits
Hi,
I'm happy to say that we were able to successfully migrate the
sourceforge.net CVS NAnt/NAntContrib repos to github.com. There are
still some clean-up tasks left to do (ie: update the website links to
point to github.com, update the development guide, etc) but the new
repositories at GitHub
Hi all,
I'm currently working on upgrading the project/solution files to VS.NET 2010
format. I was able to convert the existing files successfully but ran into a
snag with the solution configs. In a nutshell, they are all over the place.
What should be the consensus for the solution
anywhere.
So the 'Debug|Any CPU' and 'Release|Any CPU' platforms should be enough.
Great, thanks for the feedback.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on upgrading the project/solution files to VS.NET 2010
format. I
Hi,
Just giving everyone a heads up regarding the StyleTask in NAnt. A
change to this task is being made for it to start using the
XslCompiledTransform class to replace the aging XslTransform class
that has been used all this time. This change is also an attempt to
remedy an issue that is
.
Note: NAnt currently supports versions 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
of the Microsoft .NET Framework.
or
* Mono for Windows (version 1.0 or higher)
Available from http://www.mono-project.com/downloads/
BOb
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo
runs. This means you will incur a compile
on every invocation. This will kill performance for users transforming many
files.
Hmm, good observation. I'll take a look and see what's needed to get
the caching going for this task.
Thanks,
Ryan
Richard
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Ryan Boggs
Hi all,
Just an FYI, I'm planning on merging updates to the nunit2 task to the
master branch within the next few hours. These updates will bring
NAnt's NUnit2 reference libs from version 2.2 to 2.6.0. Once this
goes in, a new nightly should be available the following 24 hours in
the usual place
Hi,
I just created a pull request to fix the issues regarding
moving/copying directories. The link is below. If anyone interested
in getting this fix in to master, please take a look at the diffs in
question and see if they look ok. Feel free to leave any relevant
comments on the pull request.
21, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's been quite a bit of developments these past months in the NAnt
projects, as many of you may know, and now I think we are at a point
to start up the release process for 0.92. The current plan is to
perform the first 0.92
Hi,
That's because the nunit2 is running on the framework that NAnt is
currently running on. Which is the highest version of the .NET
framework found on your machine. I see that you have two options.
1) Compile your project on 4.0
or
2) If you must compile your project on 3.5, then you could
Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, forgot to CC list.
Thanks,
Ryan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Adding an update parameter to the zip task
To: jerome.duc...@solog.net
Hi
Hi,
I just wanted to let people know that a new nightly builds have been
posted at sourceforge.net. The links are below.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nant/files/nant/nightly/2014-12-22/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nantcontrib/files/nantcontrib/nightly/2014-12-22/
This build addresses
Hi all,
I have a couple of pull requests for NAnt over at github.com that I am
hoping to get some more eyes on before they go in. The links are below.
So if any of you that have a moment and a github.com account, would you
mind taking a look and let me know if any changes need to be made?
This
99 matches
Mail list logo
