TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS

2010-08-23 Thread mayank.mittal1
Hi Dave, I am using net-snmp-5.4.1.2. Do we have any patches now to support this notify view over traps ? Please suggest as this has become a high priority defect in our code. Need your valuable guidance. Thanks, Mayank On 17 February 2010 12:09, Mayank Mittal

Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS

2010-08-23 Thread Dave Shield
On 23 August 2010 08:19, mayank.mitt...@wipro.com wrote: Do we have any patches now to support this notify view over traps ? No. Nobody has submitted anything to address this issue since the discussion earlier this year. Please suggest as this has become a high priority defect in our code.

RE: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS

2010-08-23 Thread mayank.mittal1
Thanks Dave, for the promp reply. Will definitely share the fix once available. Please do suggest on this last Question: Do we have snmp v3 trap supported in this version? The reason being we have two open defects which are as follows : 1)SNMP v3 user configured with AES privacy , when queried

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote: At the moment --without-openssl fails to prevent the use of openssl in snmpusm.c. The test case is an x86_64 host with 64-bit openssl libs but not 32-bit openssl libs and you build a 32-bit net-snmp. The attached

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:10:00 +0200 Magnus wrote: MF At the moment --without-openssl fails to prevent the use of openssl in MF snmpusm.c. MF The test case is an x86_64 host with 64-bit openssl libs but not 32-bit MF openssl libs and you build a 32-bit net-snmp. MF MF The attached patch fixes that.

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:55:32 -0400, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com said: RS updating existing ifdefs seems fine... what's with the extra ifdefs for the RS variable decls? I'd expect to see a corresponding ifdef where the vars are RS used. I agree with Robert: I questioned the exact same

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Dave Shield
On 23 August 2010 16:54, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: RS updating existing ifdefs seems fine... what's with the extra ifdefs for the RS variable decls? I'd expect to see a corresponding ifdef where the vars are RS used. I agree with Robert: I questioned the exact same

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:04:47 +0100, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk said: DS If you check the code, the only place where the two variables DS actually appear in this file *is* within just such an #ifdef block. DS I'm not sure why - since this functionality doesn't seem to be DS tied

Re: RFV: Do not use opensll libs unless HAVE_LIBCRYPTO is defined

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:04:47 +0100 Dave wrote: DS If you check the code, the only place where the two variables DS actually appear in this file *is* within just such an #ifdef block. well then, +1 -- This SF.net email

CFV: fix some tls tests

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Story
First, a poll: do you think a CFV is needed for changes to non-default test scripts? i.e. scripts that won't be run unless explicitly requested by the user? Now the patch: this patch: - makes a cert name unique, since the cert util fingerprint lookup apparently does a prefix match, resulting

Re: configure: This platform does not yet support hrSWInstalledTable rewrites

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:56:22 +0200 Niels wrote: NB Given that I am running RedHat 5 and Ubuntu 10.04 I am a bit surprised NB to see (keep seing) this message. yeah, I've been seeing it on Fedora 12/13 too. NB It seems that this is caused by defining HAVE_LIBRPM depending on it NB being required

Re: CFV: fix some tls tests

2010-08-23 Thread Thomas Anders
Robert Story wrote: do you think a CFV is needed for changes to non-default test scripts? i.e. scripts that won't be run unless explicitly requested by the user? IMHO no. In case others disagree, consider this a +1 for your patch. :-) +Thomas

Re: configure: This platform does not yet support hrSWInstalledTable rewrites

2010-08-23 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:53:54 -0400, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com said: RS I was able to build a mini-agent (no swinst) and default agent (with swinst) RS with this patch. The only thing I don't like is that the mini-agent is still RS linking with the rpmlibs, even though they aren't

RE: Reference material for creating entirely dynamic subagents?

2010-08-23 Thread Marc Butler
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On subagents? On 22 July 2010 15:42, Marc Butler mbut...@alticast.com wrote: I am trying to implement an intermediate interface that facilitates an entirely dynamic (no mib) subagent Can you explain a bit what you

Error messages in snmpd.log

2010-08-23 Thread Abhimanyu Chowdhary
Hello evryone, I am useing net-snmp-5.3.3 on MIPS architecture. I am getting following error messages in snmpd.log during initial snmpd bootup: netsnmp_assert !registration != duplicate failed agent_registry.c:536 netsnmp_ subtree_load() netsnmp_assert !registration != duplicate failed