Hello.
I want to extend an agent with agentX. My target is to monitor Quagga, and I
have to use some specific MIBs.
These MIBs are the Quagga MIBs, and I've read I have to use "mib2c" to
obtain .c and .h files.
I'm not sure how to use "mib2c" when I have a MIB with different OIDs, I
read that I ha
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:42:36 +, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> 5.5.1: +1
DS> 5.6.1: +1 iff rc2 scheduled
DS> -1 otherwise
Right, as of my last mail that'll be a +1 :-)
(and a +1 from me)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
---
5.6.1.rc2: 12/28
5.6.1: 1/4
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database sto
On 22 December 2010 21:51, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> DS> Maybe we need to review our definitions of "show stopper" at
> DS> next month's admin meeting.
>
> Probably a worthy discussion.
I've added this to the agenda.
(Having first created an agenda to add it to :-))
Dave
---
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:34:44 -0500, Bill Fenner said:
BF> It's somehow a regression against net-snmp 5.5, so IMO it is more
BF> important for 5.6. I can't explain what is different in 5.5 that it
BF> worked with the same code, but it did.
I suspect luck was involved. I suspect if you ra
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:55:49 +, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> Unless I've missed something, the effects of this particular problem
DS> don't match any of these three cases. (I believe it results in wrong
DS> or missing information - though I haven't been paying much attention
DS> to the
On 22 December 2010 14:55, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
> persistent file.
5.5.1: +1
5.6.1: +1 iff rc2 scheduled
-1 otherwise
Dave
--
On 22 December 2010 16:13, Robert Story wrote:
> DS> > - 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
> DS>
> DS> Hmm this isn't really a show-stopper, so strictly speaking
> DS> shouldn't be applied.
>
> I dunno... I think broken AgentX processing is a pretty big deal.
But remember the definition of "show stopper"
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:55:14 +0100 Niels wrote:
NB> The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
NB> persistent file.
NB>
NB> This patch fixes it (and removes some identity casts). The crucial
NB> point is setting the viewMaskLen before calling read_octet_string.
+1
-
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:28:56 + Dave wrote:
DS> On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker
wrote:
DS> > We actually need two votes now per patch now:
DS>
DS> > - 5.5.1 (now in pre1)
DS>
DS> +1(though I'd be tempted to set the two lengths
DS> at the start of the loop, rather than th
The bug describes how the view mask is lost when read from the snmpd
persistent file.
This patch fixes it (and removes some identity casts). The crucial
point is setting the viewMaskLen before calling read_octet_string.
Index: snmplib/vacm.c
===
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker
> wrote:
>> - 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
>
> Hmm this isn't really a show-stopper, so strictly speaking
> shouldn't be applied.
It's somehow a regression against net-snmp 5.5, so IMO it is more
importan
Thanks Wes. Ignore my last query on netsnmp_table_helper_add_indexes().
I found where I did make the mistake.
From: sujata patra
To: Wes Hardaker
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 2:46:33 PM
Subject: Re: do
From: Wes Hardaker
To: sujata patra
Cc: Wes Hardaker ;
[email protected]
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:05:34 AM
Subject: Re: doubt in nested table implementation
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:15:12 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
> said:
On 22 December 2010 04:42, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> We actually need two votes now per patch now:
> - 5.5.1 (now in pre1)
+1(though I'd be tempted to set the two lengths
at the start of the loop, rather than the end)
> - 5.6.1 (now in rc1)
Hmm this isn't really a show-stopper
15 matches
Mail list logo
