Greetings all,
It's been a while --- time to finally release a 5.10 pre-release
candidate. Consider this a feature freeze and the master branch should
only be used for bug fixes at this point. Please give 5.10.pre1 a
whirl -- it certainly won't be perfect yet.
--
Wes Hardaker
P
Pushpa Thimmaiah writes:
> I would like to know invalid characters or characters that are not
> allowed for snmpv3 authPhrase and privPhrase. Does the following
> password valid.
You should be able to put passwords with interesting characters in
quotes if you need them.
--
Wes Hardak
Pushpa Thimmaiah writes:
> Could you please confirm net-snmp allows same snmpv3 user with
> different credentials?
No that is not possible. It actually doesn't have to do with Net-SNMP,
the SNMPv3 protocol alone requires a separate user name if you need
different credentials.
--
W
al networks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
but I don't think we handle that now
you're right.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
re how the alarm stack got corrupted.
Do you have private code loaded into the agent as well? Or is this
stock net-snmp code without modifications? Either way, you should
upgrade to the latest net-snmp release as 5.7.3 was quite a while ago.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-co
etc which aren't as widely supported unfortunately).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Pushpa Thimmaiah writes:
> Is this known issue in version 5.7.1? I did test the same on net-snmp-5.9
> and
> could see 5 retries.
I'd argue you should be using 5.9.4 then :-) 5.7 is long past supported.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
general:
- configure: Remove -Wno-deprecated as it is no longer needed
- miscellanious ther bug fixes, build fixes and cleanups
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailin
; ?
Without double checking the source code, I'm pretty positive that the
same default settings are used when using INFORMs too.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-sn
-admins-2023-to-2033.asc file is the one you
need.
[and yes I published it to key servers a while ago too]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
ent openssl that has received certification instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
hout multi-person reviews.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
ether or not it has been authenticated. It's the responsibility of
the receiver to decide what to do.
[some have argued they should always log what they receive, but mark it
as whether it was authenticated or not]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@l
ks if activity on publishing patches to this branch
appropriately declines.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
never be sending SNMP outside your
local network generally. Retries depends on locally seen packet loss.
Probably something like 3-ish is about the right value even in most cases.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
__
We've started the process of creating a 5.9.4 release. Please test and
file pull requests when you run into problems you can fix.
tar/zips are available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.4-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net
ES"
section.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
were the only critical fixes.
> Debian has 5.9 in stable and 5.7.3 in old stable I'm going to try to
> fix.
Is there any reason you can't push stable to 5.9.3? Because that is
supposed to be an incremental upgrade such that systems are able to
upgrade safely without concern about
man exchange from the agent
> (maybe it doesn't support the SNMP-USM-DH-OBJECTS-MIB MIB)
That may have meant it wasn't complied in. Make sure the
snmp-usm-dh-objects-mib module is complied into the agent.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
s for SHA1. Instead, use
SHA256 for example to get a stronger token.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
t contexts are you referring to exactly
that isn't getting cleared? Are you referring to a mib module
registration on a particular v3 context, or?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp
on -- how are you setting the
engineID? If you're using a "string", the encode engineid still has
some leading binary information to indicate it was set as a string. IE,
the engineID consists of more than just the string itself (per the
SNMPv3 RFCs).
--
Wes Hardake
Craig Small writes:
> Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded.
Nice, thanks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-cod
So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3/
This fixes the last minute bug with .so library naming in 5.9.2.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
n't know about every algorithm
combination. Interesting results.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
To fix the discovered shared library versioning issue in 5.9.2,
5.9.3.rc1 has been published and is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3-pre-releases/
Please give it a whirl, with the goal of proper 5.9.3 being published
next week.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail
in other setups?
I agree we should fix these problems, but not in the 5.9.3 timeframe as
they're bigger fixes and 5.9.3 should get out the door asap.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp
e a problem to solve first -- how do we get main in
line with the important changes in the V5-9-patches branch?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
So this issues:
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/432
Likely warrants an immediate 5.9.3 with only the change to libcurrent in
Makefile.top.
I'll try to get 5.9.3.rc1 out the door today to address this.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-c
I'll send a full announcement early next week, but Net-SNMP 5.9.2 is
published and is at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2/
I'm thinking we should look toward a main-branch release next (5.10).
Opinions welcome.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
There have only been a few changes since rc1, but enough that it
warrants another rc2. Please propose no changes at this point unless
there is a critical issue.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp
e net-snmp-config tool to help
with this:
Instead of figuring out how to use this directive and where to
put it (see below), just run "net-snmp-config --create-sn‐
mpv3-user" instead, which will add one of these lines to the
right place.
--
Wes H
Hanh Nguyen writes:
> I'm new to the net-snmp community. I'm looking for the changes for bug 2923
> -Avoid that
> snmpv3 bulkget errors result in a double free
Hi Hanh,
I'll look at this hopefully in the next 2 days. Thanks for submitting
the patch.
--
Wes Hardaker
aid, will help]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
nyone) must get 3 vote positive approvals on the -coders list to go
into a future release.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
ms like that is to use SNMPv3 contexts,
where each context can map to a different subagent with overlapping OID
registrations. You can make v1/v2c communities to v3 contexts using the
com2sec configuration tokens if you wish.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lis
as I'll be cherry-picking and
> might miss some subtle but important patch.
I'd expect 5.9.2 final to come out sometime in the next month. I'll
push a another pre-release or rc1 this week. There weren't that many
changes since pre1, so a rc1 is likely possible.
--
Wes Hard
ply it.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Craig Small writes:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders,
>
> wrote:
>
> Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
>
> I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this.
>
> I'
Greetings all,
Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
Please file any issues or pull requests required to improve the state of
this release.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to
Charles Polisher writes:
> I found a bug in snmp-bridge-mib that causes incorrect results
> when the number of bridge ports exceeds one digit, because a
> string compare is used on numeric data.
Thanks, applied!
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
g definition of "small" has certainly increased in size over time
with the continued increase of storage/memory availability in even the
smallest devices.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
it.
> Also what exactly does "com2sec -Cn ctx_remote notConfigUser default
> cmty_remote1"
> means?
You should read this page for information about access control
configuration:
https://net-snmp.sourceforge.io/wiki/index.php/Vacm
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
Neil Mckee writes:
> This may have been covered many times before, but just in case it
> helps someone, here is a summary of my experience with using net-snmp
> in a large network.
Thank you for the very useful list of changes.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-sn
And then set
your MIBS environment variable to be correct to. So putting it in
/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs was the right first start, but you also need
to set the MIBS environment variable to be "+PERSONAL-MIB" or whatever
you called it (note you need the leading +)
--
Wes Hardaker
Plea
ed scopedpdu there is nothing the
client and do (and its not its fault, it's the agent's).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
h
ing. snmpget is just pulling the answer and the count from the
agent's response packet and not calculating it itself.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing li
x27;t find it in a default location.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
e a chance that you have them from an older build? IE, can you
try building it from a fresh source extraction?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
x27;s certainly been a (very) long time since the IRC channel was fully
active.
I think it'd be great if one was used, but I agree that we should
determine whether or not there is enough interest or not to actually
have one.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-c
nfo->getMode() == MODE_SET_ACTION) {
> # ... (or use the value)
> $value = $request->getValue();
> }
You're setting the $value variable but never using it again -- you would
need to update the $defa
he remote server. There is no way
to know whether or not it was received. If you want that support, you
should be using INFORMs instead of TRAPs.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coder
p] tag before them:
[snmp]
serverRecvBuf ...
serverSendBuf ...
[snmptrapd]
# rest of file
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
eforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.1-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
It was produced from the V5-9-patches branch and is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.1-pre-releases/
Please take it for a test drive and see how it fairs.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
-snmp-config command, because when the agent shuts
down it will overwrite your new user that it doesn't yet have.
(you can also create new users live with the snmpusm tool, but it's a
bit more complex)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.
tely.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
you editing the files to remove the
user or using snmpusm to delete them?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
that describes some of the states
and how processing is done:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Agent_Modes
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
ment. In fact, some of
the features within Net-SNMP came from government funded research
contracts.
> In addition to the requested approval for use, can you please
> verify that the software is UNCALSSIFIED (for our documentation)?
Nothing in Net-SNMP's documentation or code has
chandrasekharreddy chinnapareddygari
writes:
> I want to include/ use external library is n net-snmp 5.8.
> Please help me to use external library.
Use the --with-libs configure script option.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
is done in
the parent agent to ensure that only one SET is handled at a time.
I suspect there are some other issues to think about too.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing
in the results then you're linking to an external
library.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
27;d be easy to extract a list of all nodes using the tree/etc
printer of snmptranslate with MIBS=ALL set, and then diff the results
with before/after the patch?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snm
at through the use of
the "proxy" directive ; see the snmpd.conf manual page in the "Proxy
Support" section.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders
t our agent running on an operating system, or are you querying
something else? Does SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 return something in the
NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs tree?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
__
Philippe Guibert writes:
> I think you can confirm me it is not possible to 1 agent: N masters
> relationships ?
That is correct, the current code does not support more than one parent agent.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
lementing.
You can see the use of the -I switch to snmpd to remove registrations
for things you wish to pass to the proxy instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-sn
t also read the OUTPUT OPTIONS
section of the snmpcmd manual page.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
at least (even if it is "not authorized" or some other answer).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourcefo
tion works or is
that running in the agent directory itself with the libtool wrapper script?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
; data
> gets read and returned but a crash happens on the free (datactx).
I assume if you comment out that free it will gain in memory usage?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mai
your MIB? It can walk the ifTable and
other built in ones ok or not?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
, messes up when overwriting an existing
file. IE, you have to remove the existing one before re-running.
Anyway, I've done that, re-created the archive and re-uploaded. Thanks
for pointing it it out.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@
u don't need to submit a big report as well, just a patch)
http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
Andy Fiddaman writes:
> Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files.
> This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit.
Archives fixed; thanks for pointing out the issue.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
Andy Fiddaman writes:
> Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files.
> This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit.
Argg
Thanks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
e sense than an out-right removal.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
for anyone that has ever contributed code to
the Net-SNMP package before. Stay tuned.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders m
bout exactly what T0222 tests but I think it is about
> bulkget limits and thus the use of encryption and privacy is just a
> distraction so I suggest that $PRIVTESTARGS is replaced with $NOAUTHTESTARGS.
I'd rather see $AUTHTESTARGS, which is in most other places.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please
est we put it up as an official patch
instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
n: do we have any clue which OSes actually crash as a
result of the double close? (which I admit is something that should
never have been done)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mail
pecific combination. But the fix may affect many
other platforms if the fix itself contains a bug?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
-branches git branch to justify a 5.8.1 release, so we've
changed the pending version number 5.9.
This will hopefully be the last release of the 5.9 pre-releases. Only
show stopping bug fixes should be committed at this point.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-c
ation_info *tabreq)
{
netsnmp_mib_handler *ret = NULL;
if (!tabreq) {
snmp_log(LOG_INFO, "netsnmp_get_table_handler(NULL) called\n");
return NULL;
}
Which means that the function is getting called with a NULL input, which
certainly shouldn&#x
François Isabelle writes:
> I just want to being your attention to the issue reported on GitHub
> https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/147 and the corresponding
> pull-request I submitted.
Coincidentally I merged this patch yesterday, and just now found this message.
--
Wes
alled system?
The .packlist is created by the perl module specific build system. You
can safely ignore the files as part of the build process I believe (I'm
not an expert in how they're used).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders
_name) calls ]
Win32:
- BUG: 2779541 Fixed handle leak in pass_persist.
[1] http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-cod
Wes Hardaker writes:
> That one should be easy to fix and I think should go in. Wanted to bug
> Robert first though.
Looks like it'll slip to next week due to a scheduled vacation.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
nmp with version 3 works:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:SNMPv3_Options
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lis
Magnus Fromreide writes:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 07:11:16AM -0700, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders
> wrote:
> > Hugh McMaster writes:
> >
> > > net-snmp v5.8.1.pre2 was released a little over four months ago.
> > >
> > > Following a lot of
the
actual code that implements v1/v2c. That code is fairly small, the
savings is minimal. It was developed as a sponsored effort by someone
that wanted to be ultra-sure that v1/v2c wouldn't be used.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-cod
quot; to really lock down. It's
certainly beyond time it gets out the door.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
SURYA T S writes:
> Please suggest me better way to change srcip in snmpresponses,
Have you set the "agentaddress" token in snmpd.conf? This should have
an effect.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
ptrap_SNMPv3
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Shea Newton writes:
> We directed the donation today to the email address you provided, you
> should see it soon. Please do let me know if there are any issues.
Thanks Shea,
I got the donation. I think it's time to start a sticker design contest :-)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail
anism does rebuild autoconf based on the last
agreed version that we proposed using. Which was 2.69.
Maybe we should discuss what the minimum tools available should be for
new releases (again)?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
d, have more identifiers under
their column registration point.
So if your implementation of a scalar should only respond if the .0 is
present in the oid beyond your registration point.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
See also https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2930/. See
also https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/patches/1390/.
Win32:
- BUG: 2779541 Fixed handle leak in pass_persist.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.
1 - 100 of 2042 matches
Mail list logo
