Re: Integrating Debian patches

2022-07-25 Thread Craig Small
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 17:54, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > 06_extramibs.patch - which adds the Gnome MIB - touches on something I have > pondering - how should a distribution add MIBs? > > On Debian we have this patch. > > On RedHat Net-SNMP ships one heap of MIBs and libsmi ships another, > slightl

Re: Integrating Debian patches

2022-07-22 Thread Magnus Fromreide
t; > - Craig > > > 1: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/net-snmp/-/tree/master/debian/patches 06_extramibs.patch - which adds the Gnome MIB - touches on something I have pondering - how should a distribution add MIBs? On Debian we have this patch. On RedHat Net-SNMP ships one heap of

Integrating Debian patches

2022-07-21 Thread Craig Small
hey're the easiest for me). I wasn't planning on sending all 43 and grouping some similar ones up, starting with the simplest/least controversial ones. - Craig 1: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/net-snmp/-/tree/master/debian/patches -- Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-12 Thread Coders
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 12:39:41 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> Robert Story (Coders) wrote: MJS> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:13:37 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> > MJS> 1.APPLIED Wrapped SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS> > MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPDomain.c and from MJS> > MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-11 Thread Dave Shield
>>16.Provide interesting sample configuration file >> EXAMPLE.conf.def Mike> Coders, what do you think about changing the old.old example? Mike> The patched one makes comments of the disk, exec, etc. lines, Mike> and does some nice touches (imo) on the VACM lines. I haven't actually looked at t

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-09 Thread Michael J. Slifcak
Here is the link to the patch mentioned below http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/net-snmp/net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz Best Regards, -Mike Slifcak Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:13:37 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> 1.APPLIED Wrapped SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS>

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-09 Thread Coders
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:13:37 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> 1.APPLIED Wrapped SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPDomain.c and from MJS>snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c MJS> with netsnmp_os_prematch('Linux', "2.4") This got backed out, but I think the basic idea can go back

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-08 Thread Michael J. Slifcak
Note the update is attached. Please comment soon. Michael J. Slifcak wrote: Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Mike, Do you have individual patches which may have been rolled up into net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz ? No, not yet. One of my plans is to switch the build system for net-snmp to cdbs after sarge i

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-06 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Mike, > Do you have individual patches which may have been rolled up > into net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz ? No, not yet. One of my plans is to switch the build system for net-snmp to cdbs after sarge is out of the door. This will include seperating the patches. > Jochen, Would like to review these

Re: Re: Debian patches

2004-10-05 Thread slif
> > From: Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2004/10/05 Tue AM 09:04:57 EDT > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Debian patches > > On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 03:34:44 -0400 Michael wrote: > MJS> >>16.Provide interesting sample configuration

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-05 Thread Coders
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 03:34:44 -0400 Michael wrote: MJS> >>16.Provide interesting sample configuration file MJS> >> EXAMPLE.conf.def MJS> >> Would be nice. Are these changes suitably licensed (BSD-like) ? MJS> > Yes. MJS> Coders, what do you think about changing the old.old example? MJS> The patc

Re: Debian patches

2004-10-05 Thread Michael J. Slifcak
Jochen Friedrich wrote: Hi Mike, Do you have individual patches which may have been rolled up into net-snmp_5.1.2-5.diff.gz ? No, not yet. One of my plans is to switch the build system for net-snmp to cdbs after sarge is out of the door. This will include seperating the patches. Jochen, Would li

Re: Consider the Debian patches to net-snmp CVS

2004-10-04 Thread Coders
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 23:19:57 -0400 Michael wrote: Mike, Thanks for taking the initiative on this. Comments below. I agree with your assessment on the other items. MJS> 1.Remove SO_BSDCOMPAT socket option setting from MJS> snmplib/snmpUDPDomain.c and from MJS> snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c

Re: Consider the Debian patches to net-snmp CVS

2004-10-04 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:19:57PM -0400, Michael J. Slifcak wrote: > Hi, Jochen. > > 14.Change location of default AgentX socket in > agent/mibgroup/agentx/protocol.h >"/var/agentx/master" -> "/var/run/agentx" > > Tradition. Comments ? Clause 8.2.1 of both RFC 2257 and 2741 name /var/a

Consider the Debian patches to net-snmp CVS

2004-10-03 Thread Michael J. Slifcak
Hi, Jochen. I think the Net-SNMP community would benefit from the patches that are currently held in net-snmp-5.1.2-5.diff.gz. [Search "debian" and "net-snmp" to find that file] I believe that some of those patches could be applied to the V5-1-patches and main branches of net-snmp CVS trees. The