> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:55:24 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> If nothing needs a particular feature, why isn't the code for that
DS> feature omitted automatically by default?
It is omitted by default if --with-minimalist is in the flag list.
The flag is not on by default at this time be
icular feature, why isn't the code for that
feature omitted automatically by default?
> DS> But I'd suggest that features in the 5.7.x line should be regarded
> DS> as "under development", and hence be open to changes as required.
>
> Based on what? It&#x
() is only compiled if and only if something else wanted it around.
[note that I'm talking about individual functions because that's the
most common case, but there are other cases where the feature really is
encapsulated in multiple functions and the ifdef surrounds multiple
functions].
econdly, how do I know what is meant by "needless" code?
Needless for what?For example, will it remove SNMPv1 support?
SNMPv2c support?SNMPv3 support? All of these?
Does it affect which MIB modules are compiled into the agent?
Or is that an orthogonal decision?
> It also
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:19:34 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> --enable-minimalist implies --enable-mini-agent, something I think
MF> is wrong as I can see a use for a non-mini-agent where some feature
MF> is removed so I suppose I have to make sure that
MF> --disable-mini-agent work
uot; ?
To quote:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Feature_Marking_and_Selection
"Many components of Net-SNMP are present to support certain features
in the code. But if the code that requires a feature isn't compiled
in, the supporting code still is and needlessly adds to the size
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:55:44AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
>
> Request for clarification:
>What is the idea behind "minimalist" (?minimialist?!?),
> and how does this compare with the traditional "--enable-mini-agent" ?
--enable-minimalist enables the feature removal code that was introdu
On 31 August 2011 00:42, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> MF> I agree on this part as well, and admit that I am at a loss for what
> MF> to call the flag. Ideas appreciated here. (by the way,
> MF> enable-minimalist-including-wants is confusing as it excludes,
> MF> rather than includes, the wants)
>
> enabl
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:51:02 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> I agree on this part as well, and admit that I am at a loss for what
MF> to call the flag. Ideas appreciated here. (by the way,
MF> enable-minimalist-including-wants is confusing as it excludes,
MF> rather than includes,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:54:10 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> > said:
>
> MF> I think feature-remove should
>
> It took me a while to get around to following the logic.
>
> Fundamentally, if I got it right, you want the default
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:54:10 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> I think feature-remove should
It took me a while to get around to following the logic.
Fundamentally, if I got it right, you want the default result of the
feature_want() to actually not get it.
This would be a change
give configure the flag --enable-minimalist -
> MF> Is this correct?
>
> Yes, but I'd word it differently: "If you want to remove code that isn't
> marked as needed by something else" then add that flag.
>
> MF> --with-out-features=A doesn't seem to
ked as needed by something else" then add that flag.
MF> --with-out-features=A doesn't seem to trigger the generation of
MF> features.h so make fails.
Really? I'll have to check into that one. Did you specify
--enable-minimalist too? I guess if you didn't then the
Hello.
I am trying the features.
First some general questions:
If I want to build with all code then I give configure the flag
--disable-minimalist (or nothing as this is the default) - Is this
correct?
If I want to build with all code that is required or wanted by something
I have configured
various build systems (MSVC, MinGW, Cygwin).
The second shows the features that are missing in the Windows build and
the differences between the various build environments for Windows.
I plan on filling in all the question marks but help from others would
be appreciated.
Alex
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 03:42:11PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > Log Message:
> >> > ---
> >> > Use '--enable-new-features' mechanism to include hrSW* re-writes
> >>
> &
2008/7/28 Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Log Message:
>> > ---
>> > Use '--enable-new-features' mechanism to include hrSW* re-writes
>>
>> Is "--enable-new-features --without-rpm" supposed to be supported (in
Jul 2008)
> >
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > Use '--enable-new-features' mechanism to include hrSW* re-writes
>
> Is "--enable-new-features --without-rpm" supposed to be supported (in SVN
> trunk)?
I'd say it should work.
All combinat
Dave Shield wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Is "--enable-new-features --without-rpm" supposed to be supported (in SVN
>> trunk)?
>
> Not yet.
> I've been discussing the handling of RPM-based swInstTable
> with Jeff John
2008/7/28 Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Log Message:
>> ---
>> Use '--enable-new-features' mechanism to include hrSW* re-writes
>
> Is "--enable-new-features --without-rpm" supposed to be supported (in SVN
> trunk)?
No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 17125
> http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17125&view=rev
> Author: dts12
> Date: 2008-07-25 14:19:27 + (Fri, 25 Jul 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Use '--enable-new-features' me
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:50:11 -0700, "David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> Wes, slap me, because I can't control myself
Don't worry guys. I'll see David on Sunday most likely. Consider him
slapped.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
---
HI,
In the below, the comment "User validation is not possible with snmpv1
or v2c because they are only based in community's name." is not strictly
valid. In a well planned deployment, each unique user identity (user
name, security name, etc.) can be mapped to a unique value of
the "community stri
it was compiled, and in some cases which platform it
>was built for, the protocols supported by the Net-SNMP agent are
>described clearly in the FAQ file, which is a component of the
>compressed tar source file found at http://www.net-snmp-org/download/
>
>>if have, what do they con
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:28:52PM +, agon EastDr wrote:
> in snmp v1,v2c,
> how can I limit a user access to a mib node? TO describe it more exactly is
> that I want one user has only the read access to a mib node, but another
> user has both read accesss & write access to the same mib node.
in snmp v1,v2c,
how can I limit a user access to a mib node? TO describe it more exactly is
that I want one user has only the read access to a mib node, but another
user has both read accesss & write access to the same mib node. in addition
, sometimes, the 3rd user may be prohibited from access
> in snmp v1/v2 implemention,
> how can I limit a user access to a mib node?
The first thing to realise is that SNMPv1/2c has no concept of
"users". It purely works in terms of a "community string".
If two different people use the same community string,
then they'll be treated in exactly the sam
hallo, Dave,
is there any security feature implemented by net snmp for
v1,v2 snmp agent?
The SNMP agent implements access control based on the "community string"
(in practise, a sort of password), and the source of the request.
in snmp v1/v2 implemention,
how can I limit a user access to a mib nod
> is there any security feature implemented by net snmp for
> v1,v2 snmp agent?
What sort of security features did you have in mind?
The SNMP agent implements access control based on the "community string"
(in practise, a sort of password), and the source of the request.
But
compressed tar source file found at http://www.net-snmp-org/download/
if have, what do they conform to?what is the key to implement the
security features?
Oriental Dragon
_
---
This
is there any security feature implemented by net snmp for v1,v2 snmp agent?
if have, what do they conform to?what is the key to implement the security
features?
Oriental Dragon
_
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http
31 matches
Mail list logo
