5.1.1, or apply a patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=963666&group_id=12694&atid=312694
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
x. Check out what the
serviceTable_create_row() does, and you'll see that dealing with the index is
more complex that just setting the value in the table context.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchiv
configure for the new
environment. There are some cross compiling tips here:
http://www.net-snmp.org/faqs/rstory/#cross
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost
ssue lurking that nobody's hit yet.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
--
sponses on this? I see at least one confirmation in a
bug-report, so I say commit it. BSD has been broken for too long.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty ma
behaviour, I'd lean slightly towards defaulting to the old behaviour.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
st=powerpc \
--target=powerpc-hardhat-linux-gnu --with-endianness=big
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all differen
g the
behavior and updating the FAQ, I wouldn't raise a stink.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
e, or even rejected,
unless someone has the time to review it carefully to make sure it doesn't
break anything. Given the limited time we all have, we have to draw the line
somewhere.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarch
DULE MIBFILE
GM> ...
GM>
GM> Is this a known issue or should I fix and send a patch?
Well, I'm not sure what you are proposing to change. Have you tried deleting
your .index file so it will be regenerated?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive:
rade to a later version, this code is not enabled by default.
I can't remember exactly when it changed, though.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twis
release to
focus on clearing out the bug back-log instead of the fun stuff (new features).
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, al
special about
DS> this constant - it's just used to control the size of the
DS> internal data array.
The other option would be to use a dynamically sized array (or a
netsnmp_container).
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.ne
If that still doesn't help, let us know
and we'll go from there.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
e the return. This will be fixed in 5.1.2 and beyond.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little
but the pdu is all ready freed up by snmp_sess_send?
Nope, what you've done is correct.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are los
-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows
ut losing your changes, you should use the
new utility mib2c-update (also new for 5.2).
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze
ert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email is spons
7;< 1'
and see if that works any better for you.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
--
a feature request tracker.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
--
http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Lear
riginal example by looking at the remaining
BBC> .1.1.1 in the OID.
That should work. Make sure you handle get-next properly!
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twi
ied to V5-1-patches and main branches.
MS>
MS> -Coders, the hr_filesys.FRSIZE.diff patch of patch #956272
MS> applies cleanly to a copy of the V5-0-patches branch.
MS>
MS> Let me know if this patch is approved for V5-0-patches.
If a patch is a bug fix, doesn't break an
anged from size_t back to ssize_t,
MS> > Builds on FreeBSD, Linux, and Win32 compile and run without problems.
MS> >
MS> > I did not run pass nor pass_persist, as the problem description
MS> > indicates the error occurs under certain conditions.
MS> >
MS> > The one line
> index.oids = (oid *) & index_oid;
MR> index.len = index_oid[0]+1;
Ok, that sets up an index. But when are you doing this? What do you do with
index once you've built it?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.ne
/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the ex
fragmentation is generally considered a bad thing.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-
; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Th
he MAX_PDU, then, must be for limiting the size of
get-bulk responses. Although that doesn't explain why it's not used anywhere in
the code!
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-code
sink defined.
I'd guess that multiple snmpd.conf files are being read, and thus more than on
trap2sink is being read. Or you also have a trapsink or informsink configured.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum
p.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Bri
you? I'd actually prefer something that indicated cvs,
too: "5.2.0-cvs", or "pre-5.2.0-cvs".
The other developers don't agree with us. The policy seems to be that the
version numbers only change after a release.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-sn
ilarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
on branch tag (v5-1-patches)
d) ??
3) If/How to identify branch version. Give XXX from (1) above,
a) XXX[+-]-mm-dd
b) XXX[+-]n, where n is incremented [daily|weekly|manually]
c) ??
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sou
/not/usr
cd /tmp
tar xvf net-snmp-target.tar not
Then copy the tar ball to your target, and on your target
cd /
tar xvf net-snmp-target.tar
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You a
system on the
BBC> build system.
See this link for some tips on cross compiling.
http://www.net-snmp.org/faqs/rstory/#cross
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are
when the OID
SN> ls below the base OID of the table ?
I just checked in a fix that I think will fix the problem. Let me know if it
helps...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You
a members mean?
http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial-5/agent/annotated.html
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
hould be triggered by
cvs activity, not simply by time. eg start/reset a N hour timer on each
checkin. After the timer expires, update the timestamp. A good value for N
would probably be 4-12 hours.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarc
e
completely, and just use "cvs-main", though at that point more detail really
becomes necessary.
DS> I think we need some input on this one
Agreed...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sou
.
BS>
BS> What do I need to do to my configure string so it remembers where it is?
Did you update /etc/ld.so.conf to include /usr/local/ssl/lib, and then run
lddconfig?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.
000 or so, and as you get responses, close the
session and re-open a new one.
Or, even better, re-use one session, instead of creating a new one for each
host.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-s
t-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend B
p://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Trai
d use it to add extra data, without changing the structure.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
unkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Train
not running as
TGS> agent x)
All versions of the agent are single threaded, and are not thread safe.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of l
nd re-add with the new name
(and hope it doesn't change again), or just update the OID and live with the
name inconsistency?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a
uest. In fact, the latest ifTable implementation uses the new
auto-reload feature to keep the cache up to date even in the absence of any
requests.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
added back. And in
keeping with Wes' rule that we don't try and force any particular coding style
(within reason) on anyone, just say the word and I'll revert the cache handler
to the original style.
However, unless there are objections to
a merge can happen for
5.3.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
Thi
verified as
well. Hopefully Bruce can help us out with that one, if he's paying attention.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze
s cvs branch, but I'm not
sure.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-
solution.
I hadn't heard that one before.
What happens if you leave syslog running but start snmpd in a terminal window
like so:
snmpd -f -L
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-
somewhere else on the local machine to create
the tarball for the target:
make install prefix=/tmp exec_prefix=/tmp
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in
tatic structure
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This
hould continue to support the
DS> traditional tables as well, for compatibility with existing N/M
DS> applications that expect to query for this information.
Exactly. I think we'll all agree here.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.o
deal with the fact that their
decisions on whether or not to allow this set, which was made in RESERVE 1 or
2, needs to be re-evaluated. The only way they could easily deal with this
would be to bail with GENERR.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive:
d *will* before 5.2.0
goes out...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-
lowed
DS> my initial impulse, and pulled out of the project completely until
DS> that was finished.
Hmm.. pulled out of what project until what was finished?
At any rate, it's just like my inetNetToMedia problem. It's never easy to track
a moving targ
into 5.1.3 (I won't get to it in time for 5.1.2).
If the back port is easy, then it might go into 5.0.x as well.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twist
think for a released branch, it makes sense to use that last release +
'+cvs'.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all di
less
global list to worry about, if we ever go multi-threaded.
DS> What about breaking stale locks?
Good question. Initially I'd say not worry about them, as a stale lock would
imply a serious bug somewhere. But a watchdog alarm to
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:20:06 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:08:25 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH> 2) However, Robert is wrong that it helps APIs.
Thems theres fightin' words. I would understand 'I disagree', but 'wrong'
seems
g bugs (for example) or arguing with you,
DS> is time I'm not spending on the book (or doing what I'm
DS> actually being paid for!)
I know the feeling. I'll try and be less argumentative. :-)
DS> The only way I could have managed to concentrate on the
DS> one task woul
FAQ on access control. You can specify OID branches, or even
individual instances.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of littl
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:15:10 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >>>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:39:46 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH> DS> - By default, handlers return success/failure, but don't explicitly
WH> DS> call the next handler in the chain. [...]
WH>
WH> Robert&
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:21:01 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >>>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:26:11 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH>
WH> Robert> (side note: I think we ought to use .0 for initial releases-
WH> Robert> eg 5.2.0.pre0, 6.0.0. opinions?)
WH>
WH> What gain?
+ new branch: 5.3.sera ...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
nal) helpers as far as possible (and mark the
DS> exceptions clearly).
Noted. Added to my todo list.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a
d Net-SNMP static.
Indeed, this is mentioned in README.aix.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
elease cycle:
1) There is a pre1, in which only a few bugs are found
2) There is a fc1, in which no show-stopper bugs are found
Here's an example of what I'd like to see for the 5.2. release line:
Event version
--
cant new features) for two weeks after an x.y release.
I don't particularly like the idea, but I can see the writing on the wall...
so, ok. If there are pending new features, it's just as easy to create a
x.y+1-new features branch, to be merged back into main once x.y patches has
been creat
ry; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Bl
nmp request processing. If that is too long, then the data thread might
need to be tweaked to have a temporary store for statistics collected while
waiting for the lock.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum
ttp://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings &
lientaddr 192.168.1.1
or in snmpd.conf, like so:
[snmp] clientaddr 192.168.1.1
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all diffe
-installed headers in the mibgroup tree. They shouldn't be
in installed headers.
If you are having problems, I'm almost certainly to blame. What kind of
problems are you having?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mai
f line 174, near
JS> ""$ENV{HOME}/.snmp")"
This is a known issue on BSD systems. Do you have the latest version of
net-snmp? If not, try upgrading.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.p
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 11:53:42 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >>>>> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:40:06 -0400, Robert Story (Coders)
WH> Robert> 5.2.fc1 prep -> MAIN=5.2.fc1 --\__ release
WH> Robert> 5.2.fc1 published -> MAIN=5.2.fc2.dev --/
WH>
WH&
e that all calls to init_snmp will read in any snmp.conf files found in the
conf path, so that would be a good choice if you wanted to affect all your
subagents...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?f
Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price o
reason this [' ']' is
FT> added at the first place. Are they used somewhere else?
No, I'm pretty sure once the command line has been parsed, the should be able
to be discarded
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourcefo
rg/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DV
Let us know if you run into anything else.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-
x27; for 5.1.2.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.
5.x branches.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.N
;http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $2
to put out a
poposed patch in the next day or so...
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little
.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by
investigate.
Anyone else have any insights?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
;func=detail&aid=702435
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=12694&atid=112694&func=detail&aid=916605
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost
g messages on console.
At startup, close file descriptors 0, 1 and 2, and then immediately open
/dev/null, and call dup twice. The agent will then be logging to /dev/null.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?f
t; Any help is appreciated.
Did you configure with ipv6 support? Does ipv6 work by itself?
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of littl
lags |= NETSNMP_ITERATOR_FLAG_SORTED;
I don't think that flag was added until 5.1.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are
ject/showfiles.php?group_id=66232&package_id=65191
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
--
't have time for further
investigation at the moment.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze o
mp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100
ckopt, which, if supported by
the OS, will allow a socket to be re-used immediately.
--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie <http://www.net-snmp.org/>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little
1 - 100 of 685 matches
Mail list logo