don't think we handle that now
you're right.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
ck got corrupted.
Do you have private code loaded into the agent as well? Or is this
stock net-snmp code without modifications? Either way, you should
upgrade to the latest net-snmp release as 5.7.3 was quite a while ago.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
ch aren't as widely supported unfortunately).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Pushpa Thimmaiah writes:
> Is this known issue in version 5.7.1? I did test the same on net-snmp-5.9
> and
> could see 5 retries.
I'd argue you should be using 5.9.4 then :-) 5.7 is long past supported.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.source
:
- configure: Remove -Wno-deprecated as it is no longer needed
- miscellanious ther bug fixes, build fixes and cleanups
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net
ble checking the source code, I'm pretty positive that the
same default settings are used when using INFORMs too.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
-admins-2023-to-2033.asc file is the one you
need.
[and yes I published it to key servers a while ago too]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
ifferent openssl that has received certification instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
less of
whether or not it has been authenticated. It's the responsibility of
the receiver to decide what to do.
[some have argued they should always log what they receive, but mark it
as whether it was authenticated or not]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.
if activity on publishing patches to this branch
appropriately declines.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
P outside your
local network generally. Retries depends on locally seen packet loss.
Probably something like 3-ish is about the right value even in most cases.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-sn
We've started the process of creating a 5.9.4 release. Please test and
file pull requests when you run into problems you can fix.
tar/zips are available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.4-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp
ES"
section.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
nly critical fixes.
> Debian has 5.9 in stable and 5.7.3 in old stable I'm going to try to
> fix.
Is there any reason you can't push stable to 5.9.3? Because that is
supposed to be an incremental upgrade such that systems are able to
upgrade safely without concern about backward compatibily
the agent
> (maybe it doesn't support the SNMP-USM-DH-OBJECTS-MIB MIB)
That may have meant it wasn't complied in. Make sure the
snmp-usm-dh-objects-mib module is complied into the agent.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
SHA1. Instead, use
SHA256 for example to get a stronger token.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lis
xts are you referring to exactly
that isn't getting cleared? Are you referring to a mib module
registration on a particular v3 context, or?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing
n -- how are you setting the
engineID? If you're using a "string", the encode engineid still has
some leading binary information to indicate it was set as a string. IE,
the engineID consists of more than just the string itself (per the
SNMPv3 RFCs).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please m
Craig Small writes:
> Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded.
Nice, thanks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-cod
So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3/
This fixes the last minute bug with .so library naming in 5.9.2.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
now about every algorithm
combination. Interesting results.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi
To fix the discovered shared library versioning issue in 5.9.2,
5.9.3.rc1 has been published and is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3-pre-releases/
Please give it a whirl, with the goal of proper 5.9.3 being published
next week.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail
?
I agree we should fix these problems, but not in the 5.9.3 timeframe as
they're bigger fixes and 5.9.3 should get out the door asap.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-
a problem to solve first -- how do we get main in
line with the important changes in the V5-9-patches branch?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.
So this issues:
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/432
Likely warrants an immediate 5.9.3 with only the change to libcurrent in
Makefile.top.
I'll try to get 5.9.3.rc1 out the door today to address this.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders
I'll send a full announcement early next week, but Net-SNMP 5.9.2 is
published and is at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2/
I'm thinking we should look toward a main-branch release next (5.10).
Opinions welcome.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net
There have only been a few changes since rc1, but enough that it
warrants another rc2. Please propose no changes at this point unless
there is a critical issue.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp
e net-snmp-config tool to help
with this:
Instead of figuring out how to use this directive and where to
put it (see below), just run "net-snmp-config --create-sn‐
mpv3-user" instead, which will add one of these lines to the
right place.
--
Wes Hardaker
Pl
Hanh Nguyen writes:
> I'm new to the net-snmp community. I'm looking for the changes for bug 2923
> -Avoid that
> snmpv3 bulkget errors result in a double free
Hi Hanh,
I'll look at this hopefully in the next 2 days. Thanks for submitting
the patch.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail al
will help]
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
) must get 3 vote positive approvals on the -coders list to go
into a future release.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https
with problems like that is to use SNMPv3 contexts,
where each context can map to a different subagent with overlapping OID
registrations. You can make v1/v2c communities to v3 contexts using the
com2sec configuration tokens if you wish.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lis
ll be cherry-picking and
> might miss some subtle but important patch.
I'd expect 5.9.2 final to come out sometime in the next month. I'll
push a another pre-release or rc1 this week. There weren't that many
changes since pre1, so a rc1 is likely possible.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
apply it.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Craig Small writes:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders,
>
> wrote:
>
> Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
>
> I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this.
>
> I'll
Greetings all,
Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
Please file any issues or pull requests required to improve the state of
this release.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies
Charles Polisher writes:
> I found a bug in snmp-bridge-mib that causes incorrect results
> when the number of bridge ports exceeds one digit, because a
> string compare is used on numeric data.
Thanks, applied!
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.source
on of "small" has certainly increased in size over time
with the continued increase of storage/memory availability in even the
smallest devices.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-c
nds
it.
> Also what exactly does "com2sec -Cn ctx_remote notConfigUser default
> cmty_remote1"
> means?
You should read this page for information about access control
configuration:
https://net-snmp.sourceforge.io/wiki/index.php/Vacm
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
Neil Mckee writes:
> This may have been covered many times before, but just in case it
> helps someone, here is a summary of my experience with using net-snmp
> in a large network.
Thank you for the very useful list of changes.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-sn
and read it. And then set
your MIBS environment variable to be correct to. So putting it in
/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs was the right first start, but you also need
to set the MIBS environment variable to be "+PERSONAL-MIB" or whatever
you called it (note you need the leading +)
--
Wes Hardaker
Plea
d scopedpdu there is nothing the
client and do (and its not its fault, it's the agent's).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.so
t is just pulling the answer and the count from the
agent's response packet and not calculating it itself.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.source
couldn't find it in a default location.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
e a chance that you have them from an older build? IE, can you
try building it from a fresh source extraction?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.so
rtainly been a (very) long time since the IRC channel was fully
active.
I think it'd be great if one was used, but I agree that we should
determine whether or not there is enough interest or not to actually
have one.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sou
t_info->getMode() == MODE_SET_ACTION) {
> # ... (or use the value)
> $value = $request->getValue();
> }
You're setting the $value variable but never using it again -- you would
need to update the $default_S
e remote server. There is no way
to know whether or not it was received. If you want that support, you
should be using INFORMs instead of TRAPs.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
g before them:
[snmp]
serverRecvBuf ...
serverSendBuf ...
[snmptrapd]
# rest of file
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.1-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
It was produced from the V5-9-patches branch and is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.1-pre-releases/
Please take it for a test drive and see how it fairs.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
-config command, because when the agent shuts
down it will overwrite your new user that it doesn't yet have.
(you can also create new users live with the snmpusm tool, but it's a
bit more complex)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Harald Krammer writes:
> If an SNMPv3 node is missing, the function is blocked.
What function is getting blocked? Anything in our library should return
with a timeout error just like v1/v2. Yes, the engineID won't be
retrievable but it shouldn't cause anything to hang indefinitely.
--
to remove the
user or using snmpusm to delete them?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
that describes some of the states
and how processing is done:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Agent_Modes
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.so
of
the features within Net-SNMP came from government funded research
contracts.
> In addition to the requested approval for use, can you please
> verify that the software is UNCALSSIFIED (for our documentation)?
Nothing in Net-SNMP's documentation or code has ever been classified by
chandrasekharreddy chinnapareddygari
writes:
> I want to include/ use external library is n net-snmp 5.8.
> Please help me to use external library.
Use the --with-libs configure script option.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
parent agent to ensure that only one SET is handled at a time.
I suspect there are some other issues to think about too.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-
crypto in the results then you're linking to an external
library.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
easy to extract a list of all nodes using the tree/etc
printer of snmptranslate with MIBS=ALL set, and then diff the results
with before/after the patch?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders m
the use of
the "proxy" directive ; see the snmpd.conf manual page in the "Proxy
Support" section.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sou
our agent running on an operating system, or are you querying
something else? Does SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 return something in the
NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs tree?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-
Philippe Guibert writes:
> I think you can confirm me it is not possible to 1 agent: N masters
> relationships ?
That is correct, the current code does not support more than one parent agent.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
lementing.
You can see the use of the -I switch to snmpd to remove registrations
for things you wish to pass to the proxy instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-sn
might also read the OUTPUT OPTIONS
section of the snmpcmd manual page.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
nse at least (even if it is "not authorized" or some other answer).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourcefo
works or is
that running in the agent directory itself with the libtool wrapper script?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
> gets read and returned but a crash happens on the free (datactx).
I assume if you comment out that free it will gain in memory usage?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
MIB? It can walk the ifTable and
other built in ones ok or not?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
, messes up when overwriting an existing
file. IE, you have to remove the existing one before re-running.
Anyway, I've done that, re-created the archive and re-uploaded. Thanks
for pointing it it out.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists
as well, just a patch)
http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
Andy Fiddaman writes:
> Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files.
> This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit.
Archives fixed; thanks for pointing out the issue.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
Andy Fiddaman writes:
> Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files.
> This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit.
Argg
Thanks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
an an out-right removal.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
that has ever contributed code to
the Net-SNMP package before. Stay tuned.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net
exactly what T0222 tests but I think it is about
> bulkget limits and thus the use of encryption and privacy is just a
> distraction so I suggest that $PRIVTESTARGS is replaced with $NOAUTHTESTARGS.
I'd rather see $AUTHTESTARGS, which is in most other places.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all r
ficial patch
instead.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
we have any clue which OSes actually crash as a
result of the double close? (which I admit is something that should
never have been done)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing l
mbination. But the fix may affect many
other platforms if the fix itself contains a bug?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.
-branches git branch to justify a 5.8.1 release, so we've
changed the pending version number 5.9.
This will hopefully be the last release of the 5.9 pre-releases. Only
show stopping bug fixes should be committed at this point.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders
{
netsnmp_mib_handler *ret = NULL;
if (!tabreq) {
snmp_log(LOG_INFO, "netsnmp_get_table_handler(NULL) called\n");
return NULL;
}
Which means that the function is getting called with a NULL input, which
certainly shouldn't happen. But *where*
François Isabelle writes:
> I just want to being your attention to the issue reported on GitHub
> https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/147 and the corresponding
> pull-request I submitted.
Coincidentally I merged this patch yesterday, and just now found this message.
--
Wes
alled system?
The .packlist is created by the perl module specific build system. You
can safely ignore the files as part of the build process I believe (I'm
not an expert in how they're used).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sou
xed handle leak in pass_persist.
[1] http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/release-policy.html
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge
Wes Hardaker writes:
> That one should be easy to fix and I think should go in. Wanted to bug
> Robert first though.
Looks like it'll slip to next week due to a scheduled vacation.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor
ith version 3 works:
http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:SNMPv3_Options
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.so
Magnus Fromreide writes:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 07:11:16AM -0700, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders
> wrote:
> > Hugh McMaster writes:
> >
> > > net-snmp v5.8.1.pre2 was released a little over four months ago.
> > >
> > > Following a l
the
actual code that implements v1/v2c. That code is fairly small, the
savings is minimal. It was developed as a sponsored effort by someone
that wanted to be ultra-sure that v1/v2c wouldn't be used.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.
eally lock down. It's
certainly beyond time it gets out the door.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
SURYA T S writes:
> Please suggest me better way to change srcip in snmpresponses,
Have you set the "agentaddress" token in snmpd.conf? This should have
an effect.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.so
ptrap_SNMPv3
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Shea Newton writes:
> We directed the donation today to the email address you provided, you
> should see it soon. Please do let me know if there are any issues.
Thanks Shea,
I got the donation. I think it's time to start a sticker design contest :-)
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all r
ng mechanism does rebuild autoconf based on the last
agreed version that we proposed using. Which was 2.69.
Maybe we should discuss what the minimum tools available should be for
new releases (again)?
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
d, have more identifiers under
their column registration point.
So if your implementation of a scalar should only respond if the .0 is
present in the oid beyond your registration point.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2930/. See
also https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/patches/1390/.
Win32:
- BUG: 2779541 Fixed handle leak in pass_persist.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
d shipping them.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
rom someone else, you can use
configure's --with-out-mib-modules flag to remove it from being included
in the agent, if you know the module name (grep is your friend).
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
tp://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Vacm
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Hugh McMaster writes:
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 06:07, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > Actually, it was my job to release a 5.8.1.pre1 on Friday.
> Any news on the next pre-release, release candidate or full release
> timeline?
I'll try to get one done this week. Sigh... busy busy b
1 - 100 of 1696 matches
Mail list logo
