Hi all,
GETBULK always fills the returned buffer, so if your request does not
completely fill the returned buffer, the agent will read further in the OID
tree to fill the buffer.
(please have a look at http://jmjmon.eu/LaSupervisionDeReseau/SNMP_Mon-V010.pdf
page 74 and further)
From my
work. Tried END\n as well, but no luck there
either…
I guess, from finding the -CB option in the manpage, that
the problem have something to do with GETBULK...
--
Life sucks and then you die
--
Don't Limit Your Business
I am having a MIB which contain table structure and i have generate code
for that with the help of mib2c command
mib2c -c mib2c.create-dataset.conf IPsTable
It generates the two files IPsTable.c and IPsTable.h.
Actually when i send a command for snmpwalk
snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost -Ci
snmpbulkwalk with Cr500 i got the total pdu that i need
sudo snmpbulkwalk -v2c -Cn0 -Cr500 -c public localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.22835 |
wc -l
3909
My question is
1) Why this timeout occur ?
2) What is limit for snmpd getbulk respond?
thanks for help
Azam
Hi,
Currently I am successfully use python and php with pass_persist to handle
get and getnext. The problem occurs went I try using getbulk to my
pass_persist script. I dont receive any reply from pass_persist.
I need to deal with getbulk request. Can anybody give suggestion to me.
Thanks
Version 5.6.1.1, Windows platform...
When doing a GetBulk to a proxied agent through snmpd (snmpd is the main
agent, proxying to a non net-snmp implementation), snmpd returns an NULL
varbind just before the EndOfMib. The last entry of the response has the
last OID with its value, followed
On 30 September 2011 06:11, Pete Snmp petes...@yahoo.com wrote:
1) We use SNMP v2 for our box.
Are you implementing an agent yourself from scratch?
Or are you using the Net-SNMP agent?
Our client saying we can implement Views in v2,
where as we know this is part of v3?
The View-based Access
Dave,
This is regarding views and Master/Sub-Agent issues.
1)We use SNMP v2 for our box.
Our client saying we can implement Views in v2, where as we know this is part
of v3?
Do we have views in V2? as far as I know Views exists in V3 only !
2)Apart from that , I have a doubt regarding Master
Hi,
As per the definition, GetBulk, which accesses multiple values at one time
without using a GetNext message, minimizes the number of protocol exchanges
required to retrieve a large amount of information.
- what if the retreived information is more than 1500 bytes? how is this
handled
It should be treated like any other application and fragmented at the IP layer.
-Ken
On Sep 5, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Pete Snmp wrote:
Hi,
As per the definition, GetBulk, which accesses multiple values at one time
without using a GetNext message, minimizes the number of protocol exchanges
;
}
}
Norman
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:09:20 +
Von: Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
An: normanrae...@gmx.de
CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: GETBULK message change repetition
On 15 February 2011 15:55, normanrae...@gmx.de
On 16 February 2011 13:11, normanrae...@gmx.de wrote:
I get my data from an internal running deamon which provides the specific data
structures. The data call occurs within the function
'module_get_next_data_point' below.
Why?
The purpose of the 'get_next_data_point' routine is simply to
change the max_rep value from the GETBULK message within the snmpd.conf
file?
Request:
snmptable -v 2c -c public -Cf + 192.168.10.71 1.3.6.1.4.1.26958.25.3.3
Print statement from snmpd:
Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [192.168.10.163]:58098-[192.168.10.71]
GETBULK message, non-rep=0, max_rep=10
On 15 February 2011 15:55, normanrae...@gmx.de wrote:
Can i change the max_rep value from the GETBULK message
Yes - see the 'snmpbulkwalk(1)' and 'snmpbulkget(1)' man pages.
(though if you reduce this to one, it rather defeats the
point of using GETBULK rather than GETNEXT
: RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
Hi Dave,
I made the host to network order suggestion, and now it works for Get, GetNext
and BulkGet calls.
However iam facing a issues with Getnext/Bulk/Snmpwalk get calls going to the
next table, the bulk
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
On 26 August 2010 12:10, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely
high priority to get this issue resolved
On 26 August 2010 06:27, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Could you get a chance to look into this.
I've managed to reproduce the problem, yes.
(Once I'd stripped out all of the remaining
C++ stuff from your example code!)
Unfortunately I've only got one day before I leave
for a week's
: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:20 PM
To: Shankar, Anup
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
On 26 August 2010 06:27, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Could you get a chance to look into this.
I've managed
On 26 August 2010 12:10, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Any one else in the group, have faced this issue. it's extremely
high priority to get this issue resolved.
Any help in this is highly appreciated.
If you want a quick-n-dirty hack to get things working,
you could always tweak the
...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 8:04 PM
To: Shankar, Anup
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
On 24 August 2010 13:48
On 25 August 2010 07:21, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works
The code snipprt is as below::
Hmmm...
I'm not quite sure what is happening here.
Could you please post (as attachments) the *complete* code
of the MIB module that you
:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
On 25 August 2010 07:21, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
I changed the code as below, but now Get fails and Get next works
The code snipprt is as below::
Hmmm...
I'm not quite sure what is happening here.
Could you
On 25 August 2010 08:30, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Attached is the code..
And the header files?
What I'm looking to do is to try out your MIB module
on my local system, so I can see exactly what is going
wrong. In order to do that, I need *ALL* the stuff that
you have added (including the
and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
in the request.
On 25 August 2010 08:30, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
Attached is the code..
And the header files?
What I'm looking to do is to try out your MIB module
on my local system, so I can see exactly what is going
wrong. In order to do that, I
Hi Dave,
Could you get a chance to look into this.
Thanks,
Anup
-Original Message-
From: Shankar, Anup
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:45 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Fails:: SNMPGetNext and GetBulk has the IP Address Index reversed
: SLES 10 -- 32bit.
The problem iam facing is when I use the SNMPGet to retrieve the table entry it
Works. However the GetNext and GetBulk calls fail. I have used the
mib2c.iterate.conf to generate the code.
snmpget -v 2c -c public 127.0.0.1 1.3.6.1.4.1.1139.21.2.2.5.1.1.128.221.252.35
On 24 August 2010 13:48, anup.shan...@emc.com wrote:
snmp_set_var_typed_integer( idx, ASN_IPADDRESS,
ntohl(entry-vplexDirectorPrimaryIpAddr) );
The SMI type IpAddress is not an integer-based type.
It is a (four-octet) binary string, which holds the address
in network-byte order.
On 20 May 2010 21:30, Malathi Panyam malathipan...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is the MAX value Max repetitions for GetBulk requests?
In terms of the SNMP protocol - none.
In terms of the Net-SNMP client tools - none
I tried to increase beyond 100 and it resets to 100.
That's a limit imposed
Hi,
What is the MAX value Max repetitions for GetBulk requests? I tried to
increase beyond 100 and it resets to 100. It means we cannot go beyond 100? I
am aware that this is linked to that MAx PDU size, is there anyway that we can
increase this limit?
Thanks and Regards,
Malathi
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:35:19 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF Should the delayed instance example process MODE_GETBULK in the same way as
MODE_GET and MODE_GETNEXT, except with the extra call to
netsnmp_bulk_to_next_fix_requests(requests)?
JF
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:33:16 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF The first MIB object for which I use the delegated flag is fetched
JF correctly, but then this object is repeated with the message:
After handling the delegated response, set the delegation flag back to 0
and I
Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:33:16 +1000, John Fisher john.fis...@nec.com.au
said:
JF The first MIB object for which I use the delegated flag is fetched
JF correctly, but then this object is repeated with the message:
After handling the delegated response, set the
List members,
I am using the delegated flag in my extension of an snmp agent as
described here:
http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/delayed__instance_8c-example.html
It works well when I test it with snmpwalk, but fails when I use
snmpbulkwalk.
The first MIB object for which I use the delegated
I am using
NET-SNMP version 5.4
configured so:
./configure \
--prefix=${PWD}/net-snmp/install \
--with-perl-modules \
--enable-shared \
--enable-mini-agent \
--with-cc=ppc_82xx-gcc \
--with-ar=ppc_82xx-ar \
--with-linkcc=ppc_82xx-gcc \
--host=powerpc-montavista-linux \
--with-endianness=big \
I saw the problem with getbulk and maximum size message
was reported back in june. I tried several versions of
netsnmp including 5.4.1 and they all have this issue:
when the package create is too big, not a smaller one
is created but instead nothing is send at all.
I tried to use HP openview
If I issue a getBulk request (with max-repetitions = 30 ) with attached
the oids of the columns of a given table that has many rows, the
response only contains the elements of two rows and the first column of
the third row. The response telegram is only 500 bytes, why the agent
doesn't put all
Could my problem be related to a small MTU size on my interface?
-Original Message-
From: DI BACCO ANTONIO - technolabs
Sent: Tue 04/12/2007 18.12
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: GETBULK returns only few rows of a table even if max-repetions is high
If I issue
I have a net-snmp agent connected to an AgentX subagent.
When I issue a getbulk to the agent (for example with 5 oids), I receive
an SNMP response that contains more than 5 oids, it seems that the agent
asks subagent for more objects than the one requested.
Anyone had the same problem
On 09/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a net-snmp agent connected to an AgentX subagent.
When I issue a getbulk to the agent (for example with 5 oids), I receive an
SNMP response that contains more than 5 oids, it seems that the agent asks
subagent for more objects than the one
HH == Harrie Hazewinkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HH It returns a list, but is I print the perticular items
HH of the list, I just get the value. It there not some
HH way I can get the varbind and then have OID/value?
HH @result = $sess-getbulk(0, 5, $vars);
The vars reference you've passed
'] );
@result = $sess-getbulk( 0, 3, $vars );
use Data::Dumper;
print Dumper([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
print Dumper($vars);
__END__
The @result has just the values for the request, but the $vars are
updated to contain everything.
$VAR1 = [
'lo0',
'0',
'dp0',
'1
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 03:06 -0800, vijendra agarwal wrote:
Can you please let me know if there is any plan to implement getbulk
of agentx protocol in near future?
There's no explicit timetable for implementing this functionality, no.
It is listed in the Feature Requests tracker (#1379500
Hi to all,
I am using the netsnmp 5.2.1 version. This version is not supporting agentx
protocol getbulk request. It makes a get-next request only to subagent.
I checked the latest version ( 5.3 )also. That too also not supported the
agentx getbulk. I look the developement plan on the net-snmp
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 13:53 +0800, Kurapati M-G19456 wrote:
We are using NET-SNMP-5.1.1. We observed that, snmpd is converting a
GETBULK request into GETNEXT, and passing on the GETNEXT to a
SubAgent. Is this how snmpd is supposed to work?
If a given registration explicitly specifies
All,
We are using
NET-SNMP-5.1.1. We observed that, snmpd is converting a GETBULK request
into GETNEXT, and passing on the GETNEXT to a SubAgent. Is this how snmpd
is supposed to work? SubAgent is registering bulk_to_next() handler as part of
the OID registration. Inspite
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:33:51 +0530 Bharath (Bharath) wrote:
VB We are using NET-SNMP based agent for testing our company's products.
VB When this agent gets a GetBulk request with 7 OIDs in the var-binds (num
VB rep = 0, max rep = 50), the request gets timed out. GetBulk requests are
VB
Hi,
We are using NET-SNMPbased agentfor testing our company's products.
Whenthisagentgets a GetBulk request with7 OIDs
in the var-binds (num rep = 0, max rep = 50), the request gets timed
out.GetBulk requests are serviced fine if there is only one OID in
the var-binds. Each OID
the
MH request, the subagent locks up, and the snmpbulkget command fails.
MH
MH Master Agent Output:
MH
MH Received SNMP packet(s) from 127.0.0.1
MH GETBULK message, non-rep=0, max_rep=10
MH -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.14010.1.3.2.1
MH -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.14010.1.3.2.2
MH
, the subagent locks up, and the
MH snmpbulkget command fails.
MH
MH Master Agent Output:
MH
MH Received SNMP packet(s) from 127.0.0.1
MH GETBULK message, non-rep=0, max_rep=10
MH -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.14010.1.3.2.1
MH -- SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.14010.1.3.2.2
MH
Hi,
I am using net-snmp 5.1.1.
I am using the provided master agent daemon (snmpd) and a sub-agent that I
have coded.
I am running the master agent with the command /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f -Le
-V
My problem relates to when an SNMP GETBULK request arrives at the master
agent.
Specifically my
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 05:13:49PM +0200, Moses Reuben wrote:
I'm using snmpbulkwalk.c instead of snmpwalk.c - the function
snmp_synch_response () returns an error of STAT_TIMEOUT. What is
the reason for this, what I need to change in my application to make
snmpbulkwalk.c work properly
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:53:44 +0200, Moses Reuben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Moses I'm using the snmpwalk.c to get the route table from my router,
Moses during the session the router cpu usage reaches above 80% so I
Moses want to use getbulk instead of getnext. What I should change in
Moses my
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:23:33 +0100, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Chris Can anyone show me an example of how to use SNMP::Session::getbulk?
Chris I've used the plain get() and bulkwalk(), but I just can't figure out
Chris getbulk...
Chris My aim at the moment is to get a few entries from
Hi,
Can anyone show me an example of how to use SNMP::Session::getbulk?
I've used the plain get() and bulkwalk(), but I just can't figure out
getbulk...
My aim at the moment is to get a few entries from the UCD-SNMP-MIB:
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0
UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0
UCD-SNMP-MIB
How many variable bindings can be arraranged in a getBulk Message low.
It depends.
It depends on the values that are being returned,
and the capabilities of the two ends of the conversation.
I wish to processing getBulk message which variable binding numbers are 44, and max
repetitions
Hi,
I have a question about variable binding numbers in getBulk Message.
How many variable bindings can be arraranged in a getBulk Message low.
I wish to processing getBulk message which variable binding numbers are 44, and max
repetitions are 2.
Is This supported in net-snmp-5.1.1?
Best
On more thing, GetBulk will start
with the object ID A and ends with OID F. Am I right? or it traverses
the whole MIB for which the related OID(s) are given?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
The result of the GETBULK is simply a concatenation of the equivalent
Thanx a lot Dave for your kind help..
Tina
- Original Message -
From: Dave Shield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tina Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: net-snmp-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Getbulk
Can anybody please explain GETBULK
58 matches
Mail list logo
