Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Support. > On Oct 13, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > All, > > Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. > that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted > legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for

[netmod] leafref to lists that contain system-controlled entries

Hi all, There are a few threads on the mailing list that touch on the concept of system-controlled resources (mostly list entries): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/3fTSHIh_MfHzmuDCoicAGiXA2E0 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KIsSgKByQWpqYzA4i6Bwc8fuH3w

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, acee On 10/13/17, 10:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: >All, > >Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >that keeps the original rfc

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Yes/support Jeff >> On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote: >> All, >> >> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted >> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the >> changes to

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Hi, Support. I have also reviewed a previous version of this draft, and provided comments that I hope can be considered/discussed. Thanks, Rob On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote: All, Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. that keeps the original rfc

[netmod] FW: Liaison letter to IETF Netmod Working Group regarding NMDA modelling

All, We received this liaison a couple weeks ago. Although it has not yet been formally submitted, we like to provide a response anyway. As this request equally impacts both the NETMOD and NETCONF working groups, we request that that both working groups collaborate on a response. Thanks, Kent

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

All, Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move ahead with the adoption

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

All, This polls is closed (on 10/2). Authors, please republish the draft as draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 with the only change being the date and draft 'filename'. Thank you, Lou (and Kent) On 9/18/2017 10:33 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making >

Re: [netmod] Correction: WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00

All, This polls is closed (on 10/2). Authors, please republish the draft as draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 with the only change being the date and draft 'filename'. Thank you, Lou (and Kent) On 9/18/2017 3:47 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > The draft being polled in this thread is >