Hi, Support.
I have also reviewed a previous version of this draft, and provided comments that I hope can be considered/discussed.
Thanks, Rob On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote:
All, Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft. This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends Oct 27. Thanks, Kent (and Lou) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod .
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
