As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, acee On 10/13/17, 10:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>All, > >Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted >legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the >changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move >ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these >changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft. > >This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 >a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating >"yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state >your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to >provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG >document. > >The poll ends Oct 27. > >Thanks, >Kent (and Lou) > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
