[netmod] Draft Minutes IETF 114 netmod session

Greetings folks, draft minutes from IETF 114 are imported here https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-114-netmod-202207271500/ Additional changes or corrections can be added in the note taking tool here: https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-114-netmod?edit The youtube video of it's sessions

[netmod] Draft-minutes for ietf 113

are posted at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-113-netmod/ I am still sourcing the commentary for from System defined configuration from the youtube video so there is an update forthcoming. Thanks joel ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org

[netmod] Draft Agenda Posted for IETF 111 - Tuesday, July 27, 2021, Session II (21:30-22:30 UTC, 14:30-15:30 PDT)

   Session II (21:30-22:30 UTC, 14:30-15:30 PDT) WG Chairs:    Lou Berger    (lberger at labs dot net)    Kent Watsen (kent plus ietf at watsen dot net)    Joel Jaeggli    (joelja at bogus dot com) Available During Session:    WG ICS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/sessions/netmod.ics    ICS

[netmod] draft minutes ietf 110

We had posted an initial set, I have subsequently updated the draft minutes for ietf 110. they are viewable here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/minutes-110-netmod-01 and remain editable in the codimd https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-110-netmod?edit The transcript

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-07

(and my original nits), republish, and then hopefully we > should be ready to progress this to IETF LC. > > > > Regards, > Rob > > > > > > *From:* Andy Bierman > *Sent:* 05 March 2021 18:46 > *To:* Rob Wilton (rwilton) > *Cc:* NetMod WG Chairs ; joel

[netmod] draft minutes for 2/1/2020 Interim

all those internal versions listed? 1600 conclusion # Virtual Bluesheet NAME AFFILIATION -- 1. Lou BergerLabN Consulting, L.L.C. 1. Jason Sterne Nokia 1. Italo BusiHuawei 1. Reshad Rahman None 1. Robert Wilton Cisco 1. Kent Watsen Watsen Networks 1. Bala

[netmod] Congratulations... Re: RFC 8819 on YANG Module Tags

On getting this one out the door. The utility of this work to all of us is greatly appreciated. joel On 1/4/21 15:06, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 8819 > > Title: YANG Module Tags

[netmod] IETF 109 draft minutes

draft minutes are visible in the tracker https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/minutes-109-netmod-01 and for edits and corrections they are available live here https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-netmod?edit the real-time transcript from youtube is pasted at the bottom of the

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-07

Rob, These seem like reasonable suggestions. Lets see what the authors say. Thanks for this joel On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 6:47 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > Hi, > > Here is my AD review for draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-07. Apologies for > the delay. > > Thank you for writing this document,

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/ ___ netmod

Re: [netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03

at 17:10, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > This working group last call completed on March 2nd. > > Some corrections, and adjustments were requested in the discussion > between Juergen and Alex. > > While the last call window did not see a lot of postive or negative > support

[netmod] draft minutes culled from etherpad

Ericsson Yoshifumi Atarashi   　　　Alaxala Tim Carey, Nokia Joe Clarke   Cisco Charles Eckel,  Cisco Ray Atarashi   　　　IIJ-II William Lupton  Broadband Forum Joel Jaeggli Fastly Yuji Tochio   Fujitsu Susan Hares    Huawei Reshad Rahma

[netmod] Agenda Items - Re: Network Modeling (netmod) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-04-02

Netmod folks, now that this is scheduled if you have an item you'd like on the agenda for this meeting which you had not previously gotten in to us please send it along to netmod chairs netmod-cha...@ietf.org. Agenda items proposed so far: Netmod Ver DT presentation

Re: [netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03

to advance. I think we can call consensus on this point. if a draft 04 appears shortly addressing the changes that were made I think we can move it along. Thanks joel On 2/17/20 11:42, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Greetings, > > This was supposed to get processed shortly after IETF 106, howev

[netmod] NETMOD IETF 107 update and call for agenda items

All, This note is somewhat late, but we felt the need to get it out this week. According to the IETF 107 meeting agenda [1], NETMOD is scheduled to meet a total of 3 hours across 2 sessions, both on Monday:     13:30-15:30    Monday Afternoon session I     18:10-19:10    Monday Afternoon session

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

thanks joel On 2/25/20 12:17, Alexander Clemm wrote: > Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules. > (Back in 2017; see datatracker) > --- Alex > >> -Original Message- >> From: netmod On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli >> Sent: Mond

[netmod] IPR poll on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been

[netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang

This email begins a 2 week working group adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-06 Please voice your support or objections before the poll completes on March 3rd. Thanks joel pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff - IPR verfication request

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR

[netmod] WGLC - Comparison of NMDA datastores - draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03

Greetings, This was supposed to get processed shortly after IETF 106, however I lost track of it. We are therefore running a 2 week WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-03. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff/ the 02 - 03 diff is available here:

Re: [netmod] netmod - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 107

fyi, made this request based on the last one. On 1/12/20 11:04, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool wrote: > > > A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Joel Jaeggli, a > Chair of the netmod w

Re: [netmod] Conclusion WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4

> On Oct 13, 2019, at 08:28, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:08 PM Joel Jaeggli <mailto:joe...@bogus.com>> wrote: > This concludes the netmod WG last call for > > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4... > > There was

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext

[netmod] Conclusion WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4

t; On Sep 26, 2019, at 22:32, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > > All, > > This starts a two week working group last call for > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04 > > The working group last call ends on Friday October 11th 2019. Please send > your comments to the working group mai

Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5642)

> On Sep 6, 2019, at 12:27, Warren Kumari wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 1:53 PM Andy Bierman > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:33 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Andy Bierman wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:07 AM Peter Loborg

[netmod] IPR check draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04 Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If

[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext version 4

All, This starts a two week working group last call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-04 The working group last call ends on Friday October 11th 2019. Please send your comments to the working group mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is

[netmod] Upcoming important Dates leading to IETF 106

Folks, It's worth noting that there are several important upcoming dates between the present and IETF 106 November 16-22 2019. The early bird deadline for registration is this coming Monday, September 30th. October 18th is publication of the initial agenda November 4th is Draft submission

Re: [netmod] Processing open errata in the the netmod working group

> On Sep 23, 2019, at 01:08, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Over the course of this we we intend to process reported errata that >> we have outstanding in netmod > > I started to go through the list and comment,

[netmod] Open Errata 5517 RFC 7950 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5517

Reported By: Rohit R Ranade Section 10.4.2 says: The derived-from-or-self() function returns "true" if any node in the argument "nodes" is a node of type "identityref" and its value is an identity that is equal to or derived from (see Section 7.18.2) the identity "identity";

[netmod] Processing open errata in the the netmod working group

Folks, Over the course of this we we intend to process reported errata that we have outstanding in netmod currently in the queue are the following: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2_acronym=netmod=table

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags needs a correction

Folks Ignas, draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags, currently in IESG review is in need of a a fairly significant edit, notably the addition of an appendix covering the nmda state. It seems wiser to pull it back and add that rather than proceed forward with the document as is. Thanks joel pEpkey.asc

[netmod] Netmod Errata posted since IETF 104

The following errata have been lodged since IETF 104. Well will have a brief section of the agenda devoted to the errata. If you have strong opinions for or against any of the unverified errata please come prepared to discuss them.  The two with recent list discussion are noted with proposed

[netmod] Reminder Slides for Monday 7/22

Reminder, Our meeting is pretty early in this IETF Meeting at 13:30 on Monday 7/22. As a result of the timing having slides sent to the chairs this weekend so that they can be uploaded and included in the agenda for consumption prior to and during the meeting is greatly appreciated. Thanks

[netmod] Reminder IETF 105 - document submission deadline

Folks, Quick reminder that the internet draft submission deadline for IETF 105 is 2019-07-08 the following (Monday) at UTC 23:59. Thanks Netmod Chairs ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

[netmod] ietf 105 prelimary agenda - netmod

Folks, In the preliminary agenda NETMOD has two back to back sessions on Monday July 22, 13:30 - 15:30 and then 15:50 - 17:50. This is could be subject to change. NETCONF is also scheduled for Monday Jully 22 in the morning. It's time to start thinking about meeting submissions for netmod. The

[netmod] IETF 105 key dates

This week we are coming up on a month out from the The IETF 105 meeting in Montreal. Some milestones between now and then. 06/21 (friday) we will get the preliminary agenda and 6/28 the final version of the scehedule will be published. 07/08 Is the cutoff date for draft submission. It would be

Re: [netmod] draft item 104 meeting 1/2 minutes

I posted a lightly edited version of this as the meeting minutes in the tracker. regards joel On 4/13/19 15:35, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > IETF 104 netmod meeting minutes > > Monday Session 1 - Second half of netconf slot, 2019/03/25 1000 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw0fRh1pvec

[netmod] draft item 104 meeting 1/2 minutes

IETF 104 netmod meeting minutes Monday Session 1 - Second half of netconf slot, 2019/03/25 1000 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw0fRh1pvec Monday Session 2 - 2019/03/25 1350 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVSYk_PLPNY * Monday Session 1 * Rob Wilton and Company (55 min) YANG Versioning

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On 3/25/19 07:14, Joe Clarke wrote: > I support the need for being able to reset a DS to its factory default. > However, I have a question on the current design of the model and the > "factory-default" DS. > > It seems to me that this is a single DS that might have been intended to > reset

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

On 3/25/19 13:34, Kent Watsen wrote: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. > support. I would note that it probably needs a security considerations

Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

> On Mar 22, 2019, at 12:07, Lou Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you all for the good input on this thread. > > With the understanding that a 00 working group document is a starting point > for the working group rather than a document that is ready for last call - we > believe there is

Re: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?

achieving this. >> >> Thanks, >> Rob >> >> >> >> From: netmod On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel >> Sent: 27 February 2019 09:41 >> To: 'Joel Jaeggli' >> Cc: netmod@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support

Re: [netmod] artwork folding: dual support modes?

> On Feb 26, 2019, at 14:26, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hey. > > I’ve been having this discussion with Kent off-line, but thought it should > come to the list. > > I don’t think it is a good idea to have two approaches. While it would be > relatively easy to code for both approaches, it

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-04

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-04 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags/ ___ netmod

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

. On this basis I think we can do a writeup and forward a draft 04 to the IESG for review / IETF last call. Thanks Joel > On Nov 12, 2018, at 08:46, joel jaeggli wrote: > > During the Thursday nov 8 session of netmod, we asked if there were any > objections to the publication of the Draf

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

Something like the text below addresses the question of guidance. I think we get a better draft if we close off this discussion on the list. I think the question about where the tags reside generally is settled. Thanks joel > On Nov 14, 2018, at 09:26, Robert Wilton wrote: > > >> >> The

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

> > >> I do not think the tail end of a WGLC is an appropriate time or place to >> start wondering out loud about whether it would be a good to have. I admit >> to being confused by this since I believe you were actively participating >> WRT this work when it had the yang library

Re: [netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

> On Nov 12, 2018, at 15:36, Alex Campbell wrote: > > Perhaps my opinion also carries less weight, as someone who's only on the > mailing list and didn't actually attend the IETF meeting. > So, the reason we take the discussion back to the list is precisely to insure that we capture the

[netmod] Confirming draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03 consensus call

During the Thursday nov 8 session of netmod, we asked if there were any objections to the publication of the Draft-03 version of draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags which addresses comments and concerns raised during the WGLC. In the meeting there were none. This commences a comment period to

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-12: (with COMMENT)

Thanks all Glad that was acceptable. Joel > On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:27, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email

Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis

> On Oct 30, 2018, at 03:14, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:05:17AM +, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> In addition, it might be good to introduce [inet?] types for RFC 5322 (Internet Message Format) including perhaps: - email-address

Re: [netmod] WG LC draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 - 10/2/18 - 10/16/18

sus yet. > Thanks, Thanks for getting us to this point. Joel > Chris. > >> On Oct 25, 2018, at 3:05 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> >> This WG LC closed on the 16th. >> >> Working group last calls serve a useful forcing function even for drafts >> that may

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-08

Suupport Scan the artwork for horizontal tab characters. If any horizontal tab characters appear, either resolve them to space characters or exit, forcing the input provider to convert them to space characters themselves first. Support this only more strongly, e.g. the general

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

ly. joel > -Ekr > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:05 AM joel jaeggli <mailto:joe...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 10/16/18 06:00, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I still don't think I understand the security > impacts of >

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with DISCUSS)

On 10/16/18 06:00, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I'm sorry, but I still don't think I understand the security impacts of > this well enough to know if this text is OK. > > Can you provide a more detailed explanation of what XPath expressions > can and cannot do here? Happy to discuss live either on the

[netmod] WG LC draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 - 10/2/18 - 10/16/18

This is start of a two week working group last-call for draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a current netmod working group document. You may review at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If

[netmod] Mulligan - Re: WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

:40, joel jaeggli wrote: > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group > document. > > You may review at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 > > Please send email to the list indicating

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

On 9/26/18 09:23, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:09 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > It is even worse than a step backwards. > The draft specifies a lot of details about module tag conformance > that needs to be present

[netmod] Important milestones for IETF 103

Folks, Important upcoming milestones for the IETF 103 Bankok meeting include: 2018-10-05 - Agenda published, and we will know when we are meeting. 2018-10-22 - Draft submission deadline, 2 weeks out from meeting. 2018-10-24 - Working group agendas due. 2018-11-03 - Meeting commences

[netmod] IPR call draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

Authors, Contributors, WG, Regarding the document draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02

This is start of a two week poll on making draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 a NetMod working group document. You may review at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-02 Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please

Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-07.txt

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 12:51 AM, Robert Wilton > wrote: > > I've read -07, and would also support an WG adoption call for this draft. In > fact, I think that it would be quite good if we can move this document > through to WG LC fairly expediently as well. > > A couple of minor review

Re: [netmod] Call for adoption request of draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-04

I support this. thanks joel On 6/22/18 6:37 PM, Qin Wu wrote: > Dear WG, > > As you may recall I presented yang-xml-doc-conventions in London. There was > strong support for trying to solve the problem and mixed views on the > solution, other than that we should do it fast. In the

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ ___ netmod

[netmod] Completion: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount (version 09)

that there is consensus to proceed IESG processing and IETF last call. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this significant effort. NETMOD WG Chairs On 3/28/18 7:01 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Greetings, > > I hope that we are all recovered from the IETF meeting (or in my case an > impromptu ski holiday

[netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount (version 09)

to it, currently we have a fresh reading of it from Ariel. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg20741.html and some subsequent commentary This WGLC will conclude Wednesday April 4th. Thanks joel On 3/21/18 7:04 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Greetings, > > We are running a 2 week W

[netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount (version 09)

Greetings, We are running a 2 week WGLC again on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount in order to review the proposed changes in draft 09. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/ the 08 - 09 diff is available here:

Re: [netmod] choice/case in tree diagrams

On 3/6/18 3:29 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > Martin, > > > On March 6, 2018 4:44:47 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is >> in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract: >> >>    This document

[netmod] feedback draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags -> draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags

introduction / abstract should capture the problem module tags are attempting to solve succinctly Robert Wilton's criticism of the approach is well taken; the use of tags as regular configuration (his approach) vs the treatment of tags as exceptions (how we understand them as proposed). and seems

[netmod] Adoption Poll Completed: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

This completes the 2 week poll on making draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 a working group document. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 This document was most recently discussed at IETF 100. Response has been generally favorable and enthusiasic with some

Re: [netmod] Correction, date It ends Feb 20th Re: Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

Note that this poll ends in a couple days. thanks joel On 2/6/18 15:57, joel jaeggli wrote: > Sorry, Feb 20th is the end date for the adoption call. > > regards > > joel > > > On 2/6/18 3:47 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This is t

[netmod] IPR call draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

If any authors or participants are aware of IPR covering the proposed working-group item: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 Now would be a good time to declare it. Thanks joel

[netmod] Correction, date It ends Feb 20th Re: Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

Sorry, Feb 20th is the end date for the adoption call. regards joel On 2/6/18 3:47 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > > Hi, > > This is the start of a *two* week poll on making > draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02 a working group document.   > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/d

[netmod] Adoption Poll: draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags-02

pport" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. This poll ends on February 8. Thank you! Joel Jaeggli and I

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On 1/24/18 8:07 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > Kent Watsen writes: > >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are >> address unless significant

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05 as Best Current Practice on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On 1/23/18 3:24 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > So do you believe that this decision reflects rough consensus in the > WG? > > I hope that the document writeup will show that the WG is divided on > this issue. > > For the record, if this means that using Schema Mount *with* NMDA gets >

[netmod] Closure - : WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

, looking forward to IETF last call. joel   On 1/16/18 9:24 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > The current dicussion on the draft is not yet concluded. The WGLC will > conclude when discussion of the editorial changes is complete. > > Thanks > joel > > On 1/10/18 8:16 AM, jo

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

On 1/18/18 11:15 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 14:39 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> Ignoring process issues (not sure there are any), does it make sense >>> to publish a YANG module on the standards-track that is replaced

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

On 1/18/18 05:39, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Ignoring process issues (not sure there are any), does it make sense > to publish a YANG module on the standards-track that is replaced by > something different 3-6 months later? Perhaps I apply a different discount rate on the future particularly

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

On 1/16/18 8:01 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 16/01/2018 15:40, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> Vladimir Vassilev wrote: >> Does anyone else have an opinion on this?  I can see three >> alternatives: >> >>    1) allow any number of addtional spaces >>    2) allow any

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

The current dicussion on the draft is not yet concluded. The WGLC will conclude when discussion of the editorial changes is complete. Thanks joel On 1/10/18 8:16 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Just a reminder given the date that this was posted. This last call is > expected to complete Monday 1

[netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Just a reminder given the date that this was posted. This last call is expected to complete Monday 1/15/18. Thanks joel On 1/1/18 2:01 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Greetings, > > We hope the new year is a time to make great progess on outstanding > documents before preparation for

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: (with DISCUSS)

On 1/8/18 1:53 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut

[netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Greetings, We hope the new year is a time to make great progess on outstanding documents before preparation for the London IETF begins in earnest. This starts a two-week working group last call on: YANG Tree Diagrams draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis/ ___ netmod

[netmod] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01

Joel Jaeggli has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the NETMOD working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis/ ___ netmod

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request

Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR

Re: [netmod] Joel Jaeggli as a third NETMOD co-chair

odules come from. > etc. > There are a lot of dependencies between all these tasks, which must take > place in parallel, and, obviously, be completed ASAP. > > Kent and Lou have a lot on their shoulders these days. > To help with the situation and proactively progress docu