netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones...
Section 3.4:
- If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD contain the
integrated of the aug
On 10/18/17, 8:35 AM, "netmod on behalf of Eric Voit (evoit)"
wrote:
>> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
>> >
>> > Section 3.10: There should be
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:35:36PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> > >
> > > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools
> > > which
>
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> >
> > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which
> are run on upload of an Internet draft. Errors and warnings found later (and
>
Hi,
"Eric Voit (evoit)" wrote:
> I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones...
>
> Section 3.4:
> - If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD
> contain the integrated of the augmented model. I.e., use the pyang
> -f command to
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
>
> Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which
> are run on upload of an Internet draft. Errors and warnings found later
> (and perhaps through tools a user doesn't have) should not result in
I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones...
Section 3.4:
- If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD contain the
integrated of the augmented model. I.e., use the pyang -f command to generate
the tree so that you can explicitly see the schema
@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> > (Resending, apologies in case of duplicates)
>
> Resending? This is the first time I'm seeing these. Did you send them when
> the
ine canonical order of YANG
statements.
Thanks
--- Alex
-Original Message-
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:22 AM
To: netmod@ietf.org
Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087...@ietf.org
Subject: [netmo
rfc6087...@ietf.org
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
This starts a two-week working group last call on:
Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
Please send email to
odule" is different from "Convert an old Non-NMDA
Module" described in section 4.23.3.3
When do we need to create a temporary NMDA module?
14. Section 4.26.4
s/access access control/access control
-Qin
Forwarded Message
Subject:
[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Watsen"
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 9:06 PM
> The Last Call for this document has completed with *no* responses,
other than Benoit's question regarding if it should be a BCP, which also
had no responses, other than my own wondering
The Last Call for this document has completed with *no* responses, other than
Benoit's question regarding if it should be a BCP, which also had no responses,
other than my own wondering if YANG (and hence the guidelines) was stable
enough.
Lou and I discussed. It is our opinion that, given
This starts a two-week working group last call on:
Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14
Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns.
We are particularly interested in
14 matches
Mail list logo