Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-20 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14 I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones... Section 3.4: - If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD contain the integrated of the aug

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-18 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
On 10/18/17, 8:35 AM, "netmod on behalf of Eric Voit (evoit)" wrote: >> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: >> > >> > Section 3.10: There should be

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-18 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:35:36PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > > > > > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools > > > which >

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-18 Thread Eric Voit (evoit)
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 18, 2017 2:22 AM > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > > > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which > are run on upload of an Internet draft. Errors and warnings found later (and >

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-18 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, "Eric Voit (evoit)" wrote: > I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones... > > Section 3.4: > - If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD > contain the integrated of the augmented model. I.e., use the pyang > -f command to

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-18 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:06:44PM +, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote: > > Section 3.10: There should be a normative set of YANG validation tools which > are run on upload of an Internet draft. Errors and warnings found later > (and perhaps through tools a user doesn't have) should not result in

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-17 Thread Eric Voit (evoit)
I was also encouraged to provide comments. A couple (new?) minor ones... Section 3.4: - If a tree diagram is included for an augmented model, it SHOULD contain the integrated of the augmented model. I.e., use the pyang -f command to generate the tree so that you can explicitly see the schema

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-17 Thread Alexander Clemm
@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14 > > Hi Alex, > > > (Resending, apologies in case of duplicates) > > Resending? This is the first time I'm seeing these. Did you send them when > the

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-17 Thread Kent Watsen
ine canonical order of YANG statements. Thanks --- Alex -Original Message- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 11:22 AM To: netmod@ietf.org Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087...@ietf.org Subject: [netmo

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-16 Thread Alexander Clemm
rfc6087...@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14 This starts a two-week working group last call on: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14 Please send email to

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-16 Thread Qin Wu
odule" is different from "Convert an old Non-NMDA Module" described in section 4.23.3.3 When do we need to create a temporary NMDA module? 14. Section 4.26.4 s/access access control/access control -Qin Forwarded Message Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-03 Thread t.petch
- Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 9:06 PM > The Last Call for this document has completed with *no* responses, other than Benoit's question regarding if it should be a BCP, which also had no responses, other than my own wondering

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-02 Thread Kent Watsen
The Last Call for this document has completed with *no* responses, other than Benoit's question regarding if it should be a BCP, which also had no responses, other than my own wondering if YANG (and hence the guidelines) was stable enough. Lou and I discussed. It is our opinion that, given

[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-09-12 Thread Kent Watsen
This starts a two-week working group last call on: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14 Please send email to the list indicating your support or concerns. We are particularly interested in