Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Stephen!
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
> > Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
> > Review result: Ready
> >
> >
> > I reviewed
Thanks, Andy!
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kathleen Moriarty
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your review, Stephen!
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell
>>
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Dear all,
The document draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06 is in AUTH48.
It's time to close this issue, let me copy i...@ietf.org.
If you object to the change below, let me know before the end of the week.
The changes are to the text, so that the text is adapted to what the tools do.
No
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Module Tags
Authors : Christan Hopps
Lou Berger
Thanks for your review, Stephen!
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
> Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
> Review result: Ready
>
>
> I reviewed the diff between -18 and RFC6087. [1]
>
>[1]
>
On 3/6/18 3:29 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
>
>
> On March 6, 2018 4:44:47 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
>> in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
>>
>> This document
On 03/05/2018 06:40 PM, Per Hedeland wrote:
On 2018-03-05 16:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:49 +0100, Per Hedeland wrote:
On 2018-03-05 15:41, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:26 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Juergen Schoenwaelder
Martin,
On March 6, 2018 4:44:47 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module tree
Hi,
After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module tree
diagrams.
I have reached the conclusion that we probably shouldn't make any
drastic
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:45:49PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> I agree that using well defined terms add clarity. However, the
> proposed text is not quite right. Possibly:
>
> rw for configuration data- and choice nodes
> ro for non-configuration data- and choice
Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
>> is one of:
>> rw for configuration data
>> ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs
>>
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:00:23PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6020,
"YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5272
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Module Tags
Authors : Christan Hopps
Lou Berger
Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
>
>
> On March 6, 2018 4:44:47 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
> > in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
> >
> >This
On 06/03/2018 12:04, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
Rob,
Just to clarify: in this case we are not changing the model, it is the
same model but the device SW in release X is not supporting the
feature and in release Y it is. Supporting the feature results in
adding that part of
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:34:02AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
wrote:
>
> I agree but the fact is that some of the BBF models have constructions like
> that and we were wondering whether this should not be mentioned in the
> guildelines document. Normally a server can't set
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> OLD:
>
> is one of:
> rw for configuration data
> ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs
> and actions, and notification parameters
> -w for input parameters
Rob,
Just to clarify: in this case we are not changing the model, it is the same
model but the device SW in release X is not supporting the feature and in
release Y it is. Supporting the feature results in adding that part of the
tree to the configuration that is related to the feature and
On 3/6/2018 10:44 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module tree
diagrams.
I have reached the
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > OLD:
> >
> > is one of:
> > rw for configuration data
> > ro for non-configuration data, output parameters to rpcs
> >
Arguably the guidelines, or YANG, should say "don't allow this" ;-)
I think that what you are describing is just another instance of "don't
augment with a mandatory node rule", or "only backwards compatible
changes revisions should be made to a published YANG module".
The key reasoning
On 3/6/2018 7:10 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Lou Berger wrote:
Martin,
On March 6, 2018 4:44:47 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:00:23PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:44:11AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > >
> > > OLD:
> > >
> > > is one of:
> > > rw for configuration data
Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 5, 2018, at 6:27 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Martin Bjorklund > wrote:
> >> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> >>> On Mon,
+1 for this solution.
Thanks,
Rob
On 06/03/2018 09:44, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
After thinking some more about this, realizing that this document is
in AUTH48, and looking at the first sentence in the Abstract:
This document captures the current syntax used in YANG module tree
32 matches
Mail list logo