t 10:11 AM
To: Mahesh Jethanandani
Cc: Clyde Wildes , "t.petch" , Yaron
Sheffer , Ron Bonica , NETMOD
Working Group , "Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20
[+benoit]
Mahesh,
That's fine, if we want to put the RFC
)"
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20
[+benoit]
Mahesh,
That's fine, if we want to put the RFC Editor note into the Introduction, I see
that you did the same in the ACL draft. But there still remains the use of IP
addresses (not hostnames) in examples
[+benoit]
Mahesh,
That's fine, if we want to put the RFC Editor note into the Introduction, I see
that you did the same in the ACL draft. But there still remains the use of IP
addresses (not hostnames) in examples and, if we're fixing that, let's please
also fix the typo in the title of Secti
Kent,
> On Feb 23, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Hi Clyde,
>
> Looking at your diff, I see that you aligned the Usage Example text and
> artwork by making the artwork use the IP address from the text, but you
> should've instead used the hostname in both locations. Please see sect
Hi Clyde,
Looking at your diff, I see that you aligned the Usage Example text and artwork
by making the artwork use the IP address from the text, but you should've
instead used the hostname in both locations. Please see section 3.6 here:
https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/checklist.
Also, I s
On 2/22/2018 11:49 AM, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Watsen"
To: "t.petch" ; "NETMOD Working Group"
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM
Kent
You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to.
The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams
sho
- Original Message -
From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)"
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:21 PM
> Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron,
>
> A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published
that addresses your concerns.
Optimist:-)
And we can always have fresh concerns:-(
I no
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Watsen"
To: "t.petch" ; "NETMOD Working Group"
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM
>
> > Kent
> >
> > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to.
> >
> > The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams
> > should be an Informa
Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron,
A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published that
addresses your concerns.
Thanks,
Clyde
On 2/20/18, 9:06 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote:
> Kent
>
> You illustrate beautifully the problem I would li
> Kent
>
> You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to.
>
> The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams
> should be an Informative Reference.
>
> Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC number
> is assigned.
>
> Therefore, a note asking the
- Original Message -
From: "Kent Watsen"
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:03 PM
> Buggers, I thought we caught that tree-diagrams informative/normative
thing before.
>
> Regardless, Clyde, please note that I think I was wrong before from
the shepherd write-up regarding idnits having a
Buggers, I thought we caught that tree-diagrams informative/normative thing
before.
Regardless, Clyde, please note that I think I was wrong before from the
shepherd write-up regarding idnits having a problem:
"""
== Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore' is defined on line 1340,
b
Dear all,
- the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned.
Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro
The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores.
- As mentioned in
13 matches
Mail list logo