Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

OD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bcla...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20 [+benoit] Mahesh, That's fine, if we want to put the RFC Editor note into the Introduction, I see that you did the same in th

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

<ie...@btconnect.com>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.i...@gmail.com>, Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bcla...@cisco.com> Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20 [+

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

[+benoit] Mahesh, That's fine, if we want to put the RFC Editor note into the Introduction, I see that you did the same in the ACL draft. But there still remains the use of IP addresses (not hostnames) in examples and, if we're fixing that, let's please also fix the typo in the title of

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Kent, > On Feb 23, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Hi Clyde, > > Looking at your diff, I see that you aligned the Usage Example text and > artwork by making the artwork use the IP address from the text, but you > should've instead used the hostname in both

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Hi Clyde, Looking at your diff, I see that you aligned the Usage Example text and artwork by making the artwork use the IP address from the text, but you should've instead used the hostname in both locations. Please see section 3.6 here: https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/checklist. Also, I

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

On 2/22/2018 11:49 AM, t.petch wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" To: "t.petch" ; "NETMOD Working Group" Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM Kent You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

- Original Message - From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:21 PM > Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron, > > A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published that addresses your concerns. Optimist:-) And we can always have

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

- Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" To: "t.petch" ; "NETMOD Working Group" Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 5:06 PM > > > Kent > > > > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to. > > > > The current

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron, A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published that addresses your concerns. Thanks, Clyde On 2/20/18, 9:06 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: > Kent

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

> Kent > > You illustrate beautifully the problem I would like a solution to. > > The current thinking AFAICT is that tree-diagrams > should be an Informative Reference. > > Therefore, the RFC Editor will not hold publication until an RFC number > is assigned. > > Therefore, a note asking the

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

- Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 6:03 PM > Buggers, I thought we caught that tree-diagrams informative/normative thing before. > > Regardless, Clyde, please note that I think I was wrong before from the shepherd write-up

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Buggers, I thought we caught that tree-diagrams informative/normative thing before. Regardless, Clyde, please note that I think I was wrong before from the shepherd write-up regarding idnits having a problem: """ == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore' is defined on line 1340,

[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Dear all, - the draft is NMDA compliant, right? It should be mentioned. Ex: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03, in the abstract and intro The YANG model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture defined in I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores. - As mentioned