Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

This officially closes the LC on YANG Library bis draft. I know that separately there has been a YANG Doctors review of this draft. Authors, please post an updated draft addressing the comments received during LC and other reviews on the document. I will then do a shepherd’s writeup and send it

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On 16/02/2018 15:33, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: Hi Lada, On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that is ready for advancement. I have three minor comments: 1) module "feat

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Robert Wilton writes: > Hi Lada, > > > On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Robert Wilton writes: >> >>> I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that >>> is ready for advancement. >>> >>> I have three minor comments: >>> >>> 1) module "feature" in YANG libra

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Hi Lada, On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that is ready for advancement. I have three minor comments: 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a list in YANG

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Andy Bierman writes: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:03:32PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: >> > >> > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a >> > list in YANG

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Robert Wilton writes: > I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that > is ready for advancement. > > I have three minor comments: > > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is > a list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this is due to on

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

> > > -Original Message- > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder > > [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > > To: Alexander Clemm > > Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG > > ; NETMOD WG > >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:03:02AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > The reason the deviation is a list is because it has a name and revision. > > Or it did until it was removed. > > > > > I p

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:03:02AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > > The reason the deviation is a list is because it has a name and revision. > Or it did until it was removed. > > I prefer to keep the contents of the "module" list the > same as RFC 7895. The "improvement" is much worse -- > harder

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:03:32PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: > > > > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a > > list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:03:32PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: > > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a > list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this is due to one of the > incarnations when it contained additional information.  I think that we > should revert

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that is ready for advancement. I have three minor comments: 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is a list in YANG libary bis. I suspect that this is due to one of the incarnations when it cont

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

:48 AM > To: Alexander Clemm > Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG > ; NETMOD WG > Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis) > > Alexander, > > I disagree. This YANG Library is mandatory for all implementations; what you > talk > about seems to concern

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

rite another draft or do a bisbis. >> Cheers >> --- Alex >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:29 PM >>> To: Alexander Clemm >>> Cc

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

ahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG ; NETMOD WG Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis) I must have missed your actionable proposal that is relevant for _all_ NETCONF and RESTCONF implementations. YANG data models are extensible so lets use that. /js On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:58

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

dy > > > -Original Message- > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de > ] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:29 PM > > To: Alexander Clemm > > Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG > > ; NETMOD WG > >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

ni ; NETCONF WG > ; NETMOD WG > Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis) > > I must have missed your actionable proposal that is relevant for _all_ NETCONF > and RESTCONF implementations. > > YANG data models are extensible so lets use that. > > /js >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

lto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > > To: Alexander Clemm > > Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG > > ; NETMOD WG > > Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis) > > > > Alexander, >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

rom: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:48 AM > To: Alexander Clemm > Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani ; NETCONF WG > ; NETMOD WG > Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis) > > Alexander, > > I disagree. T

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Alexander, I disagree. This YANG Library is mandatory for all implementations; what you talk about seems to concern only implementations that support YANG push. Hence, this is an extension that should go in its own module. /js On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:38:31PM +, Alexander Clemm wrote: > Hi

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Hi, I have taken a look at this document. My main comment is that one aspect that is missing, that I believe should be added, concerns the inclusion of certain metadata about the modules. Specifically, in the context of YANG-Push we had a discussion about being able to mark nodes that are not

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

As co-author, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. As a contributor, I have read this document and think that it is ready for advancement. Kent On 2/2/18, 4:30 AM, "Netconf on behalf of Robert Wilton" mailto:netconf-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of rwil...@cisco.com

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Thanks, Rob On 01/02/2018 18:59, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: WG, The authors of rfc7895bis have indicated that they believe the document is ready for LC[1]. This starts a two week LC on the draft

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani < mjethanand...@gmail.com> wrote: > WG, > > The authors of rfc7895bis have indicated that they believe the document is > ready for LC[1]. > > This starts a two week LC on the draft >

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > WG, > > The authors of rfc7895bis have indicated that they believe the > document is ready for LC[1]. > > This starts a two week LC on the draft > . The LC > will end on February 15. > > Please send your

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:59:47AM -0800, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > Authors please indicate if you are aware of any IPR on the document. > I am not. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | German