Re: [Nix-dev] still waiting for https://cache.nixos.org after 5 seconds...

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 09:32:21AM +, Denis wrote: > It is a server-side setting Oh sorry, I thought you meant the proxy on my end. No, that's a good idea. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl

Re: [Nix-dev] still waiting for https://cache.nixos.org after 5 seconds...

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 08:34:29AM +0100, Kevin Cox wrote: >You can turn that off Yeah, but I'm not going to do that. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl https://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] still waiting for https://cache.nixos.org after 5 seconds...

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:02AM +, Denis wrote: > I really do not understand the reasons of the strong opposition to > another mirror on Cloudflare (free of cost, although it may not solve > the problem completely - it has no endpoint in Vietnam, for example - > it may increase availability

Re: [Nix-dev] Easier GTK theming

but it's not upstream. Here it is: commit 0df8a7c7ba26f368f01ada4233dedc4193cdbebf Author: Jookia <166...@gmail.com> Date: Sat Apr 8 20:16:54 2017 +1000 gtk2: Patch theme paths diff --git a/pkgs/development/libraries/gtk+/2.x.nix b/pkgs/development/libraries/gtk+/2.x.nix index 306e2db.

Re: [Nix-dev] Nix init system

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Luescher Claude wrote: > Hello, > > After watching some videos about nix I gave it a try but as soon as I > noticed systemd I deleted the VM image right away. Either remove it or just > close the development of this whole OS. Oh but why? You don't have

Re: [Nix-dev] Should we drop 9P?

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:29:09PM +0100, Profpatsch wrote: > On 17-03-20 10:27pm, Volth wrote: > > Recently few bugs in 9P were found (#23957 #23020 #22695) which > > reveals that 9P code is not very mature and perhaps NixOS is the first > > team which uses 9P heavily and relies on it in

Re: [Nix-dev] The Church of Suckless NixOS is looking for followers

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:56:14PM +0100, Matthias Beyer wrote: > Never thought about what you wrote there. Thanks for the new > perspective! > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > Kind regards, > Matthias Beyer > > Consider switching to free software. > It adds value to your life. >

Re: [Nix-dev] The Church of Suckless NixOS is looking for followers

't want this then a fork will be there. This is the first I've heard of this Suckless NixOS project, and to me since I don't see a reason why there's a fork it means opportunity. Regards, Jookia. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] The Church of Suckless NixOS is looking for followers

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:10:51AM +0100, Matthias Beyer wrote: > On 18-03-2017 11:39:15, Jookia wrote: > > Having enough interest to get forked is certainly a good thing. Who > > knows, maybe NixOS will join the ranks of other distros with > > spin-offs. > >

Re: [Nix-dev] Gajim and OMEMO

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:50:39PM +0100, Jörg Thalheim wrote: > In unstable you should get by default all dependencies required for Omemo: > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/applications/networking/instant-messengers/gajim/default.nix#L13 > > These are the packages added to

Re: [Nix-dev] Gajim and OMEMO

I have this as a package: { stdenv, makeWrapper, fetchurl, pythonPackages, buildPythonPackage, python , gajim, potr }: let gajim-omemo = stdenv.mkDerivation { name = "gajim-omemo"; src = fetchurl { url = "https://api.github.com/repos/kalkin/gajim-omemo/tarball/8356479;;

Re: [Nix-dev] Best Practices on Modularizing Configuration.nix?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:15:27AM -0500, Mark Gardner wrote: > So far, this seems like a good approach. Except that each machine has its > own configuration.nix that I would like to keep in the git repository too > but of course I can't have different top level files with the same name. To >

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] e2c95b: nftables module: Add new module for nftables firew...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: e2c95b46e5fbd9f28cc7714802f9cd3b632fd979 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/e2c95b46e5fbd9f28cc7714802f9cd3b632fd979 Author: Jookia <166...@gmail.com> Date: 2017-02-26 (Sun, 26 Feb 2017) C

Re: [Nix-dev] linux-ck kernel config

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 12:42:16PM +, Azul wrote: > Anyone here uses a linux-ck patched kernel ? > http://users.tpg.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/ > > and willing to share their config ? > > my laptop tells me he seriously misses that kernel from it's Arch days Here's my somewhat dated Novena

Re: [Nix-dev] Override php xslSupport config option

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 09:59:20PM +0300, Игорь Пашев wrote: > Something like this: > > { php70 }: php70.merge { > cfg = { > apxs2Support = false; > ldapSupport = false; > mssqlSupport = false; > pdo_pgsqlSupport = false; > postgresqlSupport = false; > sqliteSupport =

Re: [Nix-dev] Bootstrap Nix

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 01:42:09AM +0300, Игорь Пашев wrote: > Hello guys :-) > How do you bootstrap Nix on an entirely new platform? I wrote this guide on how to bootstrap NixOS back a while ago: https://nixos.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_NixOS_on_ARM Bootstrapping nixpkgs is another issue entirely

Re: [Nix-dev] 6 month C4 adoption period

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 01:17:02AM +0800, stewart mackenzie wrote: > Throw beers at Garbas! Shower him in the best beer possible! > > *Garbas rubs his nipples* 2.7.5: Administrators SHOULD block or ban "bad actors" who cause stress and pain to others in the project. This should be done after

Re: [Nix-dev] 6 month C4 adoption period

oesn't mean they voted against it (there wasn't even a vote!) Jookia ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 584b66: ddrescue: lzip is a nativeBuildInput

ARM" This reverts commit f9654a88e76703a80b8d1464f384bba21abeaf52. At least for now, the problem has gone away on ARMv7 by the switch of FPU flags used by GCC. Some details of the bug at: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/16850#issuecomment-232339143 Commit: 6c4ba06597be6efec7e2036c

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] ba2232: srelay: init at 0.4.8b6 (#16833)

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: ba2232f1f2759766df55d65bb0d81eaa0219a856 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/ba2232f1f2759766df55d65bb0d81eaa0219a856 Author: Jookia <166...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-07-11 (Mon, 11 Jul 2016) C

Re: [Nix-dev] Packaging free software that costs money

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:10:41AM +0200, Profpatsch wrote: > No, but we should strife to enable developers however we can. Could we perhaps find a way to do this without requiring the user to lie about paying for something just to install something they don't need to pay for?

Re: [Nix-dev] Packaging free software that costs money

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Profpatsch wrote: > On 16-07-07 01:18am, Jookia wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 04:35:51PM +0200, Moritz Ulrich wrote: > > Is it really Nix's job to enforcing the business models of software, rather > > than > >

Re: [Nix-dev] Packaging free software that costs money

money, want to trial the software or test if it works on their machine. In this case Ardour is packaged by many distros for free. Is it really Nix's job to enforcing the business models of software, rather than just packaging it? Surely the application could j

Re: [Nix-dev] [y...@cock.li: Re: Malicious installation methods]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:01:00PM +, zimbatm wrote: > I don't mean to say that GPG is a bad idea. It just that using SSL is a > better idea unless we nail the GPG bit. Not everyone is getting > state-sponsored attacks. TLS and GPG aren't mutually exclusive, you can use both. It's also worth

Re: [Nix-dev] Configuring vim with override

ue; }; flags = { xim.enable = true; }; }; Jookia. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

[Nix-dev] Container notification broken

/lib/containers/vpn/var/lib/private/host-notify: No such device or address Perhaps it's best to drop "--bind=/run/systemd/notify:/var/lib/private/host-notify" and use systemd's notifcation system if it breaks everything? Cheers, Jookia. ___ nix-d

Re: [Nix-dev] How to get correct length of a string containing non-ascii characters

should the base 'unit' be for a string? A code point? A character? A glyph? A grapheme? How would this be implemented? > Best Regards, > Erik Rybakken Cheers, Jookia. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Flattening pkgs tree in nixpkgs/pkgs

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:38:52AM +, Tomasz Czyż wrote: > 2016-01-08 0:34 GMT+00:00 Jonn Mostovoy : > Still don't see the value in it. I would just prefix them with > haskellPackages-, pythonPackages-. How would we do something like 'buildInputs = with pythonPackages;

Re: [Nix-dev] Flattening pkgs tree in nixpkgs/pkgs

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:29:35PM -0700, Mathnerd314 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Jookia <166...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:38:52AM +, Tomasz Czyż wrote: > > > 2016-01-08 0:34 GMT+00:00 Jonn Mostovoy <j...@memorici.de>

Re: [Nix-dev] Perl -> C++

On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 10:12:50PM +1100, stewart mackenzie wrote: > I'm aware that Rust can replace Perl via FFI it's the added deps that > concern me Could you elaborate on this? I've seen a lot of talk about dependencies but what exactly is the problem? Portability sounds like a genuine

Re: [Nix-dev] Disabling patchelf on ARM

he most I can find is https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/8 which may or may not be related as it affects Fedora. My solution is to disable patchelf since it's breaking things without good reason. > Regards, > Lluís. Cheers, Jookia. ___ n

Re: [Nix-dev] Disabling patchelf on ARM

nary only applications. > > please provide an exaple, where patchelf is doing something wrong with > some paste from the shell. > > thank you Installing vim_configurable on ARM seems to do the trick. I can't reproduce it right now, mysterious. Perhaps I have a patched version, I'll chec

[Nix-dev] Disabling patchelf on ARM

wondering: Is there a way to disable patchelf to stop it corrupting my binaries? I'm not running any nonfree software so I'm not too worried about working with unchangeable code. Cheers, Jookia. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http

Re: [Nix-dev] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Add support for package configuration files.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 11/18/2015 12:08 PM, Jookia wrote: > > I wonder if there's any review tools that support a github > > bridge that someone could set up. It doesn't look like it from first glance. > I've seen the command-line

Re: [Nix-dev] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Add support for package configuration files.

m fine if it takes longer to get a patch reviewed or in. I don't have a good solution to fix this problem, or even if others acknowledge that it's a problem. I wonder if there's any review tools that support a github bridge that someone could set up. It doesn't look like it from first glance.

[Nix-dev] [PATCH] pulseaudio: Add support for package configuration files.

In a fashion like udev's support, this patch allows configurations from packages to be merged in to directories for PulseAudio to read from. Currently supported directories are the alsa-mixer mdoule's profile-sets and paths. This is accomplished by patching PulseAudio to read directories from

Re: [Nix-dev] NixCon thanks

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Domen Kožar wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjAmr22FZts=PL_IxoDz1Nq2Y7mIxMZ28mVtjRbbnlVdmy Here's a non-youtube mirror, useful for those that find youtube slow: https://media.ccc.de/b/conferences/nixcon/2015

Re: [Nix-dev] What license does the content of the nixos wiki and the manuals have?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 09:28:36AM +0200, Joachim Schiele wrote: > two problems i see here: > - text can't be covered by GPL thus they created CC > - some edits in the wiki are anonymous (whom to ask?) > i like that we are adressing this issue now. it is very important. > i'd go for CC BY SA 3.0

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS-Wiki alternative. Was: What license does the content of the nixos wiki and the manuals have?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:49:08PM +0200, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/09/15 14:24, Matthias Beyer wrote: > > > So, an idea came up - why not using static pages for all of this? If you > > want to do contributions via git, you can use github. If one want to > > host it, one can use

Re: [Nix-dev] Providing Debian, Arch etc. packages counterproductive?

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:37:58AM +0200, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > Hi, > > On 22/09/15 11:35, Thomas Hunger wrote: > > > I can think of two solutions 1) make the packages set up nix correctly so > > nix-env is usable out of the box and 2) Remove all custom packages and tell > > people to use the

[Nix-dev] Where would I put the bootstrapping guide?

an installer image. Jookia. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

[Nix-dev] [PATCH 2/2] nixos-install: Fix chroot flag not defaulting to Bash outside NixOS.

Passing the chroot flag to nixos-install without arguments should now give you a Bash shell as intended rather than try an empty path. This was masked by the user's shell (usually /bin/bash) being defaulted to by chroot, and being found since their paths used NixOS conventions. ---

[Nix-dev] [PATCH 1/2] nixos-install: Fix password prompt failing outside NixOS.

When bootstrapping from other distributions, nixos-install is unable to find various tools in the chroot since their paths aren't aware of NixOS conventions. This makes a small change to existing code by specifying nixpkgs/nixos instead of just nixos when running nix-instantiate in the chroot. I

[Nix-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Fix nixos-install when running outside NixOS.

Due to issues with environmental variables, nixos-install failed to install when the host operating system wasn't NixOS. This broke bootstrapping from Debian. Jookia (2): nixos-install: Fix password prompt failing outside NixOS. nixos-install: Fix chroot flag not defaulting to Bash outside

[Nix-dev] [PATCH] Fixed zImage installation when building Linux.

When building kernels outputting a zImage, the zImage wasn't correctly copied in to the installation. This broke the build process entirely, at least on my ARM machine. --- pkgs/os-specific/linux/kernel/manual-config.nix | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git