You are doing assuming things wrong.
First of all, you are not supposed to be able to build glib by installing
things with nix-env. Either nix-build or nix-shell.
Then don't set NIX_PATH for nix-shell, rather call nix-shell /path/nixpkgs
-A glib.
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Andrew Kelley
2015 at 01:41, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 16, 2015, James Cook james.c...@utoronto.ca wrote:
To perhaps simplify the problem, does anyone know how to build glib on
a NixOS system the old-fashioned way, without using nix? If I just run
./autogen.sh
On Sunday, August 16, 2015, James Cook james.c...@utoronto.ca wrote:
To perhaps simplify the problem, does anyone know how to build glib on
a NixOS system the old-fashioned way, without using nix? If I just run
./autogen.sh in a fresh glib checkout, I get a similar error to the
one Andrew is
Start by debugging at least what that Permission denied refers to.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings, I have a problem I don't know how to debug.
I'm on unstable-small channel and face the following problem —
without services that do
, removed all the services, then just added this
small expression and it (reproducibly) exploded.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
Start by debugging at least what that Permission denied refers to.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Manuel Pages
I think we shall port all the VM code of nixpkgs to use libvirt, so we get
all the virtualizations (including containers) for free.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Rickard Nilsson rickard.nils...@telia.com
wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone done any work on running NixOS tests (that is,
On 05/08/2015 12:33, Alex Dean wrote:
Thanks Luca,
On 1 - We prefer having only the latest version when possible.. I
don't think I understand this. If I am using Packer to build an Amazon
AMI and install Kafka via Nix, then all it takes is a single commit to
Nixpkgs for me to end up with a
Fowarding this email that is relevant for distros, someone may be
interested in it.
Original Message
Subject:gnupg2 gpg-agent instead of gnome-keyring
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:10:08 +0200
From: Stef Walter st...@gnome.org
To: distributor-l...@gnome.org,
To be clear, you can check here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data-server/tree/configure.ac
There's no mention of openssl or crypto. Rather nss. So if it's requiring
-lcrypto at build time it's certainly a leak of some .la without -L.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Luca Bruno lethalma
...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 July 2015 at 15:38, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
To everyone, it's not correct to add openssl to buildInputs or
propagatedBuildInputs.
It's most probably a broken .la file in some package (like I fixed
recently libarchive) that is propagating -lcrypto
To everyone, it's not correct to add openssl to buildInputs or
propagatedBuildInputs.
It's most probably a broken .la file in some package (like I fixed
recently libarchive) that is propagating -lcrypto without a proper -L flag.
So please, before adding build inputs like this and then you don't
On 27/07/2015 07:36, Andrew Kelley wrote:
mxe (M Cross Environment) is a way to cross compile for Windows. It's
a pretty great project.
There's one hitch when using it on NixOS. I guess it expects
/usr/share/aclocal/pkg.m4 to exist for some reason. I don't completely
understand it and I'm
Hello nixers,
this is a very good time to work on ZHF! Staging has been merged into
master, and hydra nixpkgs jobset has 2211 failures.
Hope we can get down to a very low number.
--
NixOS Linux http://nixos.org
___
nix-dev mailing list
You just add hydra as binary cache:
http://nixos.org/nixos/manual/ch-options.html#opt-nix.binaryCaches
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:37 AM, stewart mackenzie setor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Problem:
We have custom software to build and distribute via Hydra. We want our
cloned hydra to be
,... so let me ask a followup question:
Why isn't there a release-15.07 branch, yet?
On 18-07-2015 17:59:37, Luca Bruno wrote:
That's it. Additionally there's the staging branch for mass-rebuilds
(like
stdenv changes), to avoid people tracking master recompiling the world.
Once staging
That's it. Additionally there's the staging branch for mass-rebuilds (like
stdenv changes), to avoid people tracking master recompiling the world.
Once staging builds on hydra it means there are binaries available and it
gets merged into master.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Matthias Beyer
month.
I guess 15.10 - 15.12 or even 16.01 would be better, don't you think
so?
Also: 9k failures, wow. zero would be nice, really! :-)
Thanks for the explanations!
On 18-07-2015 19:18:16, Luca Bruno wrote:
There are important fixes in staging and we're waiting for hydra to
complete
You have an old nixpkgs.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Colin Putney co...@wiresong.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm running into an error I can't figure out.
# nix-env -i lsof
error: attribute ‘interpreterName’ missing, at
On 13/07/2015 15:58, Joel Kleier wrote:
Hello!
I'm not sure if this is the right spot to ask these kind of questions --
if not, I'd be happy to re-post this elsewhere.
My question:
I can't seem to find anywhere in the manual, or elsewhere, that defines
the form of 'import' that uses the
Great thanks! It appears that the donation page from paypal is in Dutch.
Isn't it possible to default to English? I don't see a way to change the
language of the donation page.
Best regards,
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Try nativeBuildInputs instead of buildInputs.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:21 AM, James Felix Black j...@homonculus.net
wrote:
Hi, all,
I’m enjoying my time with NixOS so far, but I’m having a devil of a time
building a patched version of the dwm window manager. I’ve been able to
successfully
Hello dear nixers,
our first and latest ZHF run was very successful. We were able to drop
hydra failures from 6000+ failures to almost zero failures! [1]
Because the next NixOS stable release will hopefully happen the next
month, I'd like to focus on getting the number of failures low again,
The multi-user.target must be kept slim, network should not be a
prerequisite.
I find my server system to have systemctl show multi-user.target|grep After:
After=nix-daemon.socket basic.target rescue.service rescue.target
swap.target nss-user-lookup.target nss-lookup.target network.target
Well it's weird, since even without that StandardOutput = journal; my
services log to journalctl. You didn't disable journal storage or something
like that, right?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Richard Wallace
rwall...@thewallacepack.net wrote:
I've got a service that I'm deploying with
Evidently the user simply didn't have /run/current-system/sw/bin in PATH.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Beyer m...@beyermatthias.de
wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange problem: My system packages on my machine I installed
yesterday has the system packages available for root, but not for
So today staging finally restarted building stuff on hydra, thanks to
whoever was involved in fixing this.
Then I noticed that some packages are failing to build, for example the
ecl compiler.
It fails like this, nix-build -A ecl:
configure.ac: error: no proper invocation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
On 26/06/2015 13:53, stewart mackenzie wrote:
Please read pieter hintjens culture and empire, specifically chapter 2
light of spheres.
Good contributors should be promoted quickly before they move off onto
other projects. Yes if you choose to use nixos you aren't going
anywhere quickly but
On 24/06/2015 15:32, Fabien Bourgeois wrote:
Hi there,
I'm a newcomer to Nix ecosystem and am theoretically really pleased
about manuals and articles I've read about it.
I will really soon give it a try and if tests fulfill my needs, I'd like
to be able to use NixOS everywhere
exist on my system, so I gues it is
referring to something…?
thank you very much!
Eike
Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com writes:
I think because you are using the nixpkgs-unstable instead of
nixos-unstable, hence the NIX_PATH is wrong. Does /nix/var/nix/
profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos
to some non-existent path? I didn't tweak this variable myself. Does it
maybe only apply to non-NixOS systems that use Nix?
Thanks
Eike
Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com writes:
It's just there if someone wants to use that path.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Eike e...@eknet.org wrote
I think because you are using the nixpkgs-unstable instead of
nixos-unstable, hence the NIX_PATH is wrong. Does /nix/var/nix/
profiles/per-user/root/channels/nixos/nixpkgs/nixos exist? If not, your
NIX_PATH is wrong.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Eike e...@eknet.org wrote:
Hello all,
I
Yes please, I'd like to receive emails for failing tests, too.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joachim Schiele j...@lastlog.de wrote:
hi,
wouldn't it be helpful if the unit tests in release.nix, like these:
# Run the tests for each platform. You can run a test by doing
# e.g.
https://nixos.org/wiki/FAQ#How_do_I_know_where.27s_nixpkgs_channel_located_and_at_which_commit.3F
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Joachim Schiele j...@lastlog.de wrote:
On 23.05.2015 19:09, Matthias Beyer wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to query which commit my channels are currently
About GNOME 3.16
-
The new nixos unstable release has finally GNOME 3.16 binaries. You can try
it with environment.gnome3.packageSet = gnome3_16;
However, because gtk 3.12 apps will not render correctly on gnome 3.16, I
also suggest you to add in packageOverrides gtk3 =
mentioned, the cd $sourceRoot is done between phases,
which is unexpectable to me.
2015-05-14 14:10 GMT+00:00 Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com:
On 14/05/2015 15:58, Daniel Hlynskyi wrote:
Then how does nix-build handle this? Is there some special hook cd
$sourceRoot after unpackPhase? Why
The renameImports was a bad choice for buildGoPackage infrastructure.
Every package would have to specify the needed renames.
Now instead each library can define goPackageAliases, and dependant
packages will automatically rename the imports.
With renameImports: A depends on B - B changed
On 14/05/2015 15:58, Daniel Hlynskyi wrote:
Then how does nix-build handle this? Is there some special hook cd
$sourceRoot after unpackPhase? Why this hook is not added to nix-shell?
Because you may be in a different directory where nix-shell can cd
$sourceRoot? Those unpack cd just don't
On 14/05/2015 10:26, Matthias Beyer wrote:
(Also send to the list, as you did not reply to the list as well)
But I need to specify my git clone of the repo, right?
And when doing this, my whole system gets rebuild using the
definitions from master, so almost everything.
You run nixos-rebuild
On 14/05/2015 10:07, Matthias Beyer wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/7771
(taskwarrior-server service definition for nixos)
How to test my service definition without installing it aka. without
polluting my boot manager with boot entries? How
On 14/05/2015 11:18, Matthias Beyer wrote:
How do you do that? My approach is nixos-rebuild build-vm as someone
else (I guess it was Lethalman) suggested, but it fails with:
$ sudo nixos-rebuild build-vm -I .
building Nix...
building the system configuration...
error: The
So guys all the stuff quoted below happened, it's all in master. Hopefully
NM 1.0 won't break your desktop too much. In case it does, please report an
issue to nixpkgs. Thanks all for the hard work.
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote
/eval/1192494#tabs-still-fail
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Because binaries of built staging are available only for that
7f9ccc6
commit, I will merge exactly
On 05/05/2015 13:14, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 05/03/2015 01:25 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
Because binaries of built staging are available only for that 7f9ccc6
commit, I will merge exactly this commit and not current staging. I
think that commit is quite good, it has few build errors. If anybody
The staging branch is now not polling for git changes anymore. Therefore
the last evaluation will finish fast without other parallel builds, which
is from 3 days ago. This kind of manual scheduling seemed to be working:
http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/staging
Because binaries of built
On 29/04/2015 11:57, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 04/29/2015 03:44 AM, Rahul Muttineni wrote:
$ nix-shell -f /path/to/nixpkgs
Are you sure that is the command you want? AFAIK people almost always
specify some relatively small things by -A or -p or a path to a custom
nix expression.
Also not -f
NM 1.0 and GNOME 3.16.1 have been merged into staging. Hopefully we'll get
binaries soon and merge to master. I also hope I didn't break things a lot
;)
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
In this period I'm working on GNOME 3.16
In this period I'm working on GNOME 3.16 and NetworkManager 1.0 [1]. In
addition to that, glib has been bumped.
I'm currently compiling the PR for staging and then merge it if
everything works.
Below the possible breakages you must be aware of. These updates are
necessary to forward our software,
On 16/04/2015 18:51, Domen Kožar wrote:
You can easily add docs for just this feature - without waiting for
other docs.
Start a section for goBuildPackage (you can steal buildPythonPackage
snippet) and
document only renameImports.
Just done ;)
___
Sometimes git repos get renamed and break go packages because of
different import paths.
Since today I've added a simple renameImports utility, not sure if that
was worth it because it was easy to do without it, anyway:
renameImports = [
foo bar
baz qux
];
Will rename imports from foo to bar
On 07/04/2015 11:41, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
Hi,
On 02/04/15 18:27, Luca Bruno wrote:
Gettext is currently depending only on libc. Gettext is an input to gcc,
so that's a very important dependency. However gtk 3.16 now requires
gettext to process xml files like glade files, and that requires
:27, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Gettext is currently depending only on libc. Gettext is an input to gcc,
so that's a very important dependency. However gtk 3.16 now requires
gettext to process xml files like glade files, and that requires xml
support via expat
Gettext is currently depending only on libc. Gettext is an input to gcc,
so that's a very important dependency. However gtk 3.16 now requires
gettext to process xml files like glade files, and that requires xml
support via expat.
Gettext is currently compiled so that it finds expat with dlopen,
I think a lot of packages rely on bashism, it's not only a matter of our
scripts. Changing to something else will bring more problems than anything
else. Also the fact that bash sees more security vulnerabilities it's
because it's extremely more adopted than others, which doesn't mean others
are
On 18/03/2015 11:26, Thomas Hunger wrote:
Hi,
I usually include a shell.nix file in my libraries for development. If
I have a dependency not in core nixpkgs then I add a local
mkDerivation using let pkg = ... in {} to shell.nix (e.g. [1]).
If I now want to use my library in another context,
On 18/03/2015 12:37, Thomas Hunger wrote:
Thanks.
That would require having the shell.nix library locally already
AFAICT. To rephrase slightly. Ideally I'd like to be able to do:
myLibrary = fetchurl { ... };
extraDepends = import ${myLibrary}/depends.nix;
buildDepends = [ ... ] ++
On 16/03/2015 00:43, Austin Seipp wrote:
Hi *,
Over the past few days, while I've been waiting for things to compile,
I've been casually triaging the NixOS pull request list and the actual
bug list, adding labels to everything to categorize issues. I think
all of the PRs open as of today are
You can check the contents of xorg.conf, look at ps ax there should be the
X process running with a particular configuration. Look there if there's
any culprit with the config first.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Brandon Barker brandon.bar...@cornell.edu
wrote:
I have the following in my
There's no single active glibc. You can write a nix expression to print the
out path of glibc from a nixpkgs commit.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Matthias Beyer m...@beyermatthias.de
wrote:
Hi,
I have the problem that youcompleteme (YCM) does not find my headers from
glibc.
So, how to
On 03/03/2015 00:02, Joel Moberg wrote:
If I install a package that provides a resource that already exist in
the environment I get a conflict, and from nix-env I get the
suggestion to change the priority.
Instead of setting priority, is there a way to instead specify which
resources in a
On 03/03/2015 15:09, Jesse Haber-Kucharsky wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've successfully installed NixOS and subscribed to the unstable
channel and everything there seems to be working well.
I started having problems when I wanted to start contributing packages
and upgrades to nixpkgs.
I cloned
Think that not even blender has been accepted this year:
https://twitter.com/tonroosendaal/status/57247337964832
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Raahul Kumar raahul.ku...@gmail.com
wrote:
Disappointing, but perhaps approaching lecturers might be a better bet.
There are uni students who
Pushed to staging.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 February 2015 at 21:18, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes we can commit that stuff separately, but must go to staging because
it's
a big rebuild of many apps.
Agreed
On 24/02/2015 16:29, Peter Simons wrote:
Hi guys,
many Python packages specify an attribute that disables build attempts
in certain packages sets, like this:
beaker = buildPythonPackage rec {
name = Beaker-1.6.4;
disabled = isPy3k;
[...]
};
Unfortunately, that
Yes we can commit that stuff separately, but must go to staging because
it's a big rebuild of many apps.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 February 2015 at 21:08, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I did that in my work for GNOME 3.14
Yes I did that in my work for GNOME 3.14, and also other stuff.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/5308
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
There are several packages in nixpkgs with rm
$out/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache. Should we
On 17/02/2015 23:59, Eike wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to add spamassassin to my email setup. So I added this to my
configuration.nix:
services.spamassassin = {
enable = true;
debug = true;
};
I then tried with `systemctl start spamd' which failed, because of
missing
On 30/01/2015 07:02, Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right forum to ask this, but what would
take to get the mesa in nixpkgs to 10.4.3? Is this planned at all?
Does each package have some maintainer?
This is the package, and maintainers are listed there:
On 29/01/2015 15:32, Eike wrote:
Hi all,
I'm building a (java) program that produces a $out/lib folder with some
things in it. But it is not a linux program, just using a similiar
directory structure. Thus I don't want it to be linked into the
environment. Is there an option to prevent nix
On 27/01/2015 19:48, Tim Sears wrote:
I am writing a nix expression to port some libraries from another distro.
The libraries have slightly non-standard locations so I would
typically add some line to my .bashrc file like
export SOMEVAR=somestring
export SOMEPATH=/opt/path/to/libs
export
On 19/01/2015 10:24, Domen Kožar wrote:
This could not be PITA if systemd would have the ability to white list
ports for a process (or with network namespaces).
It would add a burdon to maintainers of nixos modules.
But since we don't have system support, I think it's overall better to
avoid
On 19/01/2015 03:44, Shea Levy wrote:
My prediction: This will cause more headaches than it will save.
Double quote.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
We did already some helpful steps (travis for PRs, staging and release
branches, ...), but we probably need some more.
Travis is not a good fit to us, as it times out all the time. It's
a pity.
I am not sure initial
Marc I think it's the general case of more complex PRs. PR that change too
much or add too much tend to be delayed. Not only because they are harder
to test, but also harder to agree on by more people.
Easy PR are in fact faster to be pushed.
Increasing the number of committers is certainly
The problem about being cheap and yet being thought is because basically we
don't have a policy. For example the recent issue about nginx with Restart
and RestartSec. What should be the default Restart for our services?
RestartSec? Should they wait for network or not?
Ecc.
I'd ask everybody about
On 15/01/2015 01:23, Nicolas Pierron wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
If you use multiple apaches/nginx/mysql/postgresql/whatever instances
its likely to miss adjusting the port or whatsoever. Therefore I'd like
to implement a simple resource
On 15/01/2015 15:10, Catonano wrote:
Hello,
how do I set a development environment in my project folder ?
Ideally I'd like to deploy the env setup together with the code so
people won't get mad in setting up an env in order to contribute to
the project
I set my .nixpkgs/config.nix to
{
...@gmail.com wrote:
We could try to compile with ICC instead if that would be the only
thing we'd have to cp/patchelf. Is it likely we could re-use library
derivations with { cc = icc } in that case, or would we have to write
some for BLAS as well as our own tools?
On 14 January 2015 at 12:41, Luca
On 14/01/2015 18:17, Ben Darwin wrote:
You can't recompile those BLAS and LAPACK with the intel compiler using nix?
In principle yes, but (a) wouldn't we encounter the same problem
writing a Nix expression for icc, since it's only available to us as
a binary on the system? (b) we'd need to
On 14/01/2015 17:59, Ben Darwin wrote:
Hello,
I am new to Nix and am considering it for the following use case and
wonder if it would work,
and, if so, how best to implement it:
We run processing pipelines on two compute clusters. We control one
of these, but on the other
we use
On 14/01/2015 18:36, Ben Darwin wrote:
Currently we compile with GCC, and we'd probably be willing to
continue doing so since libraries do much of our heavy lifting.
Then you are left with packing the libs as nix derivation with patchelf,
and pray it works :)
Yes, as James says, you should really mount /mnt first. Mounting /mnt after
/mnt/boot means that /mnt/boot is seen empty.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:35 PM, James Cook james.c...@utoronto.ca wrote:
On 4 January 2015 at 12:04, Nikita Karetnikov nik...@karetnikov.org
wrote:
I’m trying to
Not an expert here, but maybe the binary is so much stripped that patchelf
is not able to determine the right offsets for patching the binary.
About the segfault, maybe it spawns some other process and the libs are not
propagated? That may explain why the symlink works.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at
Let's not break the discussion in two places. It started on the github
issue and can be kept there.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
How should this be written in the future ?
I've submitted a pull request which tries to change not much lines to
reach my
Thanks a lot to everybody for the effort. Will be a great release.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Rok Garbas r...@garbas.si wrote:
Awesome news! tnx everybody.
Domen you rock!
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jascha Geerds j...@ekby.de wrote:
Awesome! Thanks to everyone and especially
I get an empty response from the server from those urls.
Nix is currently re-packaging python, haskell, nodejs packages etc. So I'm
sure nix would do the job for erlang too, without the need to roll your own
package manager.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Eric des Courtis
Could you try reverting cbd30b2bde17a87075138cf0443f110e5ac0e373 ?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Thomas Bereknyei tombe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Upgrading from 14.02pre5678.gfedcba to the nixos-unstable (
http://nixos.org/releases/nixos/unstable/nixos-15.05pre54730.cbe467e/)
seems to removes
On 19/12/2014 17:21, stewart mackenzie wrote:
Checking that the patch is correct then hitting the merge button is
hardly dirty work, but its better than deep code review maintainers
burning out, whom tend to become a tad nasty. Causing a vicious cycle.
Who does the dirty work? Those people
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hmm, I’m not convinced about the whole threads-for-convenience approach
à la Java. (I think the ideal is a single-threaded event loop; of
course we want to avoid IoC, and this is where FRP or monads come in.)
It is
On 16/12/2014 05:31, stewart mackenzie wrote:
Luca, here is my config, I've stripped everything that isn't pertinent
to the testing setup (which will use NixOS).
I've pointed my hydra nixpkgs jobset input to my github nixpkgs fork
on the ejabberd branch which contains this commit:
On 16/12/2014 04:58, Carlo Nucera wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I don't know how to do that mantaing my ~/.nixpkgs/config.nix, which looks
like:
{
packageOverrides = pkgs: rec {
haskellPackages = pkgs.recurseIntoAttrs (
pkgs.haskellPackages.override {
extension = self: super:
On 16/12/2014 10:56, stewart mackenzie wrote:
Absolutely Luca, you're absolutely right.
I suspect a book needs to be written on NixOS + Hydra + Nixops, this
will be a good way to formalize knowledge and share it.
Do you know of any books in progress?
The best you can do is reading the nix
No need for --chroot, it already uses /mnt.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
the symlinks.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Jascha Geerds j...@ekby.de wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014, at 23:56, Luca Bruno wrote:
No need for --chroot, it already uses /mnt.
I think he would like to chroot into an existing NixOS installation. As
far as I know nixos-install is only used for new
On 15/12/2014 12:28, stewart mackenzie wrote:
So with the kind help of this list and on IRC, a private instance of
ejabberd can compile over our hydra. Now I need to get these options
into the same build as per
On 15/12/2014 13:09, Carlo Nucera wrote:
Hi all,
I'm packaging some Haskell stuff, and I begin to use the -m option
in cabal2nix to add myself as a mantainer for the packages I want to
keep in good shape.
I'm packaging locally, overwriting the attributes in
~/.nixpkgs/config.nix.
On 11/12/2014 10:07, Tino Breddin wrote:
The original PR negated the optionalString condition. Can you test
whether that makes it work as expected?
No it's not supposed to work like that. It's correct to have that file.
Perhaps that file is out of date.
This is a bug, interfaces must still be predictable. May it be a problem
introduced by
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/cbd30b2bde17a87075138cf0443f110e5ac0e373
?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Peter Simons sim...@cryp.to wrote:
$ nix-channel --add
It still needs linux-user-chroot to be suid, doesn't it?
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014, at 06:24 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Hello,
I've recently been trying to use Nix in a somewhat different way than
NixOS, and the builders
First of all, nix-env -i env-scipy installs an environment, that you must
load with load-env-scipy. Second, you better add python to the buildInputs.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Tom Dimiduk t...@dimiduk.net wrote:
I am running nixos-unstable, and having trouble getting scipy to import.
I
Depends on the package.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:49 PM, em...@vfemail.net wrote:
I have question about Nix proper, independent of Nixpkgs or NixOS.
What kinds of attributes are appropriate as passthrough attributes on
a derivation set,
and which attributes are appropriate to be written out
101 - 200 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
