I would assume you are talking about the processor extensions like Intel VT
(for IA32) and VT-i (for IA64) or AMD-V (I think that's their name for the
concept). As I'm sure you know since you are probably using the same laptop
as I am, the Dell D830s don't come with a processor that supports it.
Ken Barber wrote:
I once knew a developmentally-disabled individual
So... he was a Java developer? ;-)
JMJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
NLUG group.
To post to this group, send email to
Actually Rob, I do almost all my virtualization on my Macbook which does
support the Intel VT extensions. Also, my client work laptop which I
use much more than my company laptop supports the Intel VT extensions.
I admit I have been doing virtualization much more for personal
reasons
1. VMWare isn't open source. It's the hands-down leader in
We used VMWare Workstation to virtualize WinXP in RHEL5 for one of our
clients. Helped him to kill two birds with one stone.
2. Xen. I am mostly familiar with Xen on Fedora/CentOS/RHEL. It's
quite nice. I use it quite a lot at
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Evan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just popped up on /. (as im sure many of you frequent the page also..)
it seems to fit in line with this thread..
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/11/07/1535235.shtml
Yeah that is a pretty nifty feat they
Performance of virtual machines can be fairly significantly improved if
you have hardware that specifically supports it and virtualization
software (a hypervisor) that does as well. I read a fairly recent
article on this about a week ago but cannot find it now. I'll post it
when I find it
I've used VMWare, in the past, and I currently use Virtual Iron, because it
has fairly simple administration and is far cheaper than VMWare, if you want
the bells and whistles.
The big reasons to use VMWare or Virtual Iron (in my opinion) is the nice
gui administration tools and their ability to
I like VirtualBox.
www.virtualbox.org
They have a rather good enterprise solution as well.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Chris McQuistion [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I've used VMWare, in the past, and I currently use Virtual Iron, because it
has fairly simple administration and is far cheaper
One more thing that might be worth noting. I had started out making the
jump to VMware Server 2.0 on a 32bit CentOS 5.2 install on a Core 2 Duo box
with 3gb RAM. I had access to another Core 2 Duo box with 4gb RAM. Under
32bit OS, you are limited to just over 3gb RAM usable. I had read
I have used VMWare in the past. That was because the platform that
development work was being done on was very unstable. With VMWare at
least when something crashes you can take the image that just blew up or
the earlier image and start again without the 'you moved your mouse
please reload'
10 matches
Mail list logo
