Geoff Raye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>% packf `pick +l/nmh -after 03/17/2001 -and -search nmh-workers`
>http://www.raye.com/nmh-workers-20010317-20020509.gz
>aka
>http://lnk.to/archive
>So, that's just nmh-workers. Should be a start. Should be complete, as
>far as that list.
I'm pretty sure
On May 10, 2002 at 11:40, Neil W Rickert wrote:
> If development of nmh is languishing, it it because nobody is doing
> much of the work. When Richard Coleman was in charge, things moved
> along. But since then, nobody has been in charge. A few people have
> stepped in and managed things for a
[Doug Porter]
>Does anyone have a full archive of nmh-workers and nmh-bugs going
>back to at least March 17, 2001 (the last commit)? I would like
>to be able to go through the list archives to look for forgotten
>patches and any issues that may have been raised. I have tried
>to get SmartList to
On May 10, 2002 at 16:04, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n
> savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's
> account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a
> new project. The project managers
>> I've already got it (thanks to Doug Morris for putting it up today!)
>
>Now what?
ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n
savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's
account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a
new p
On May 10, 2002 at 12:47, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >If we are really going to move the CVS
> >repository this should be helpful:
> >
> > http://hackers.progeny.com/~dsp/nmh-cvs.tar.gz>
> >
> >I found that on ftp.mhost.com today when I went poking around.
>
> I've already got it (thanks to Doug
>If development of nmh is languishing, it it because nobody is doing
>much of the work.
See the previous emails; it's not that nobody is _doing_ the work, it's
that it's NOT POSSIBLE currently for anyone to do the work.
--Ken
>> I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get
>> me working repository access. There was simply some
>> strangeness between our versions of OpenSSH that made it not
>> work, no matter how much we tried.
>
>What version were you running? I see that mononoke.mhost.com is
>runn
Hey folks, nothing is served by this increasingly heated bickering.
There seems to be a general consensus on the following:
o People would like to see work continue on nmh in a timely fashion,
o People would like to get a new release together,
o CVS is a good tool and people would like t
Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Could everyone please just settle down? You all are so worried
>about moving the project to a new location, but there does not
>seem to be any immediate need for that. Ftp access and anonymous
>CVS access to nmh still work. Take what source exists and
>a
Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Listen buddy, I'm going to say it again, SLOWLY this time.
Thank you, I so clearly need remediation.
> I tried. The basic problem was simple: Doug and I couldn't get
> me working repository access. There was simply some
> strangeness between our ve
>Back around December people got all excited talking about a new
>release, rolling in patches that are floating around, and taking
>care of issues in the TODO file, but I have not seen >any<
>progress on that front. Until people start to do some real work,
>moving the repository so that it can ju
Hi Doug,
According to the man page to scan there is a %{folder} escape, which
supposedly insert the scan'ed folder in the output. The following
patch makes that really happen regardless of if a header is printed.
Please apply.
Thanks,
/Anders
--- nmh-1.0.4/uip/scan.cFri Feb 4
Anders Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Ken and Earl. It's high time we get the
> sourcres under a more stable control. I'd say go for Savannah
> of sourceforge. I don't really care which, as log as I can get
> access to it!
Could everyone please just settle down? Y
14 matches
Mail list logo
