Glenn Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to change the default components file to include a folder copy:
To:
cc:
Fcc: +sent-mail
Subject:
Obviously it won't be a clear majority, but perhaps there will be some
consensus.
I think a Fcc out of the box is entirely
Date:Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:39:55 -0400
From:Glenn Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Should this be changed,
I have a patch to change it (somewhere, if I can find it, which I
made before I discovered that this insanity was actually documented
The addition of 'Fcc: +outbox' does seem an appropriate
and consistent default for new users that can easily be
adjusted by seasoned veterans. +1.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:17:29AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
Glenn Burkhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to change the default components
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:01:47 -0400
Tom Julien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The addition of 'Fcc: +outbox' does seem an appropriate and consistent
default for new users that can easily be adjusted by seasoned
veterans. +1.
Ooops, forgot to send my answer to the list instead of Tom:
Agreed. +1
As
Bill Wohler wrote:
I think a Fcc out of the box is entirely appropriate for new users. The
Dcc usage that Earl suggests is a little more advanced, and is typically
used with procmail which is even more advanced (although it is
absolutely necessary these days). And remember that Dcc is still
Sorry to interrupt the good work thats going on with a user question,
but I can't seem to figure this one out. How do I use pick to get
messages that are in one sequence but not another, ie:
sequence a is a subset of sequence b.
I want to get the messages that are not in sequence a, something
Comments? Votes?
Seems reasonable to me.
--Ken
Scott Lipcon wrote:
Sorry to interrupt the good work thats going on with a user question,
but I can't seem to figure this one out. How do I use pick to get
messages that are in one sequence but not another, ie:
sequence a is a subset of sequence b.
I want to get the messages that are not in
Date:Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:47:32 -0700
From:Jerry Peek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Comments? Votes?
Yes, dcc has been around long enough that it isn't about to vanish
next week... (and 2822 managed to avoid stealing that field name
for some
Date:Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:58:39 -0700
From:Jerry Peek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I'm not on a system with MH right now, so I can't play around to check
| it... but I think you want to use sequence-negation.
No, that doesn't work for the
Robert Elz wrote:
... I would include a sentence or two about the risks of using dcc
when really sending a bcc (as opposed to a cc to myself).
Perhaps something like
Note that the users listed in the dcc field receive no explicit
indication that others who received the message are
Ralph Corderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps mention it in the fcc description as an alternative. I found
fcc useless for my purposes; it's really handy to have the real
message-id, etc.
Have mh set the message-id
send: -msgid
in your .mh_profile
-NWR
On July 1, 2003 at 00:17, Bill Wohler wrote:
I think a Fcc out of the box is entirely appropriate for new users. The
Dcc usage that Earl suggests is a little more advanced, and is typically
used with procmail which is even more advanced (although it is
absolutely necessary these days). And
On July 1, 2003 at 07:47, Jerry Peek wrote:
A lot of us use the dcc: header field. It acts like bcc: does on
most other MUAs. Is there any reason not to add a paragraph about it to
the send(1) manpage?
My Linux box is down right now, so I can't check this out, but here's a
new
Earl Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Including the additional note about the dangers of using dcc.
Personally, I use dcc when copying myself and bcc when copying
someone else. I personally dislike the bcc behavior of other MUAs
since they provide no indication to the receipient that they have
On 1 July 2003 at 13:51, Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that in replcomps, the Fcc only appears if you specify repl -fcc
+outbox. But then it does appear in the header.
...
Here's another idea that I sent to Glenn in a private message.
I'm not saying that it's better than any of
Ok, I've committed changes to components, forwcomps, distcomps, replcomps,
replgroupcomps, based on the discussion. Only repl.man needed to be changed;
the other man pages dynamically pull in the current default template file
when the man page is built by 'make'.
17 matches
Mail list logo
