mail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/cc19b54f/attachment.pgp>
Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> This is great, guys. I've been wanting to get something like this
> working for a while now.
Agreed. Would be awesome if someone could post it to the Wiki...
Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
>> The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
>> for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
>> without thinking about it, that this approach would
nt before it is actually executed.
I'll try to have a look at this tomorrow.
Regards,
Thomas
[1] https://github.com/Schnouki/dotfiles/blob/master/notmuch/addrbook.py
--
Thomas/Schnouki
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/a28dee05/attachment.pgp>
Thought I'd share this bit of my .emacs snippet that may be useful to go
on the emacs tips page.
This does the following:
- sets up a list of possible identities to have mail From
- on composing mail, it prompts you for who you want to send mail from
- pressing enter will give you the default
could be added to the wiki?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/7c0547fb/attachment.pgp>
ss that test but with less code
duplication than the current patch.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20
hmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/6f7231d1/attachment-0001.pgp>
ommit ID, but i suspect you're sufficiently rebased that
this wouldn't be helpful.
--dkg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchma
gp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/d11ad892/attachment.pgp>
or added fun and games.
--dkg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dkg-tiny.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15893 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/4703788b/attachment-0001.png>
-
ture
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/6dc1c7cd/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:36:07 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> > my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> > control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> > hereby present for your amusement and
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/1cf51c2e/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, wrote:
> my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
> control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
> hereby present for your amusement and comments.
> (attached as whole files, since the patch would be
e excess part-number
incrementing somewhere.
All of this should be easy to get right with a careful test case or two.
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 16:50:06 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> before, the output was a linearized version of the mime tree, in
> particular removing the multipart pieces and only enumerating the leaves
> in a depth-first walk of the tree.
>
> So a message like this:
[snip example of change]
ble
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/7437e239/attachment.pgp>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/221f9279/attachment-0001.pgp>
c: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/d27bfff8/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 17:15:17 +0200, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> I think this is only a subset of the requested functionality, since one
> can only tag consecutive threads at once.
It seems like for non-consecutive messages to be tagged, there'd have to
be some sort of mutt-style
ble
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/b1e4f8bc/attachment.pgp>
ame: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/85925103/attachment.pgp>
pects the message to be complete at that point.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/c4d289c4/attachment-0001.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/772f6f85/attachment.pgp>
case but I haven't tried implementing
that yet.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: notmuch-value3.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3296 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/36
Hi
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
> 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I
> know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to
> select a few manually and tag them (or apply some other command to
> them).
I do
On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:37:25 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
I wonder if a better approach would be to use
notmuch_message_get_header everywhere, rather than introducing
_notmuch_message_get_header_value, and have it simply recognize
headers that can be retrieved directly from
Thought I'd share this bit of my .emacs snippet that may be useful to go
on the emacs tips page.
This does the following:
- sets up a list of possible identities to have mail From
- on composing mail, it prompts you for who you want to send mail from
- pressing enter will give you the default
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, an...@khirnov.net wrote:
my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
hereby present for your amusement and comments.
(attached as whole files, since the patch would
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:52:43 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:29:07 +1000, Stewart Smith stew...@flamingspork.com
wrote:
(people who don't use or like ido may want to replace
ido-completing-read with completing-read)
I couldn't get ido to work at all
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:36:07 +0300, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:15 PM, an...@khirnov.net wrote:
my attempts to make the vim client more usable somehow spiraled out of
control and turned into a huge rewrite. The intermediate results I
On Sun, 15 May 2011 18:16:31 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote:
It's possible, and works the way you'd think it would -- just select a
bunch of threads in the search list, and then tag them. It will apply
the tag to the messages in the region. (In fact, tagging a single thread
is
On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:32 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:52:43 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 19:29:07 +1000, Stewart Smith
stew...@flamingspork.com wrote:
Thought I'd share this bit of my
On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:38:20 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2011 02:04:41 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
wrote:
1. store to/cc/bcc in xapian
Hey, Florian. I think all of these fields are actually already stored
in the database.
No, just the terms are, not
On Fri, 13 May 2011 01:07:08 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hi, Carl. I went through dme's multipart patch series and cleaned
things up.
...
The result is the new
release-candidate/0.6+mpmfix
Thanks so much! This looks much better than before.
I'm still
From the commit message:
emacs: add notmuch-before- and notmuch-after-tag-hook
This patch adds hooks that are run before/after messages are tagged
from the emacs interface. In order to implement this and to avoid
having hooks parse all the arguments to the notmuch binary
On 05/16/2011 04:42 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
Meanwhile, I still can't tell exactly what the behavioral change
intended is. The commit message talks about fully recursing
and match[ing] the MIME structure of the message. Was it not
fully recursing before? In what way did
On Mon, 16 May 2011 16:50:06 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
before, the output was a linearized version of the mime tree, in
particular removing the multipart pieces and only enumerating the leaves
in a depth-first walk of the tree.
So a message like this:
[snip
On 05/16/2011 04:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
So a message like this:
A└┬╴multipart/signed 355339 bytes
B ├┬╴multipart/mixed 353462 bytes
C │├╴text/plain 235 bytes
D │└╴image/jpeg attachment [foo.jpg] 352752 bytes
E └╴application/pgp-signature attachment [signature.asc] 1030 bytes
On Mon, 16 May 2011 16:50:06 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
So a message like this:
A└┬╴multipart/signed 355339 bytes
B ├┬╴multipart/mixed 353462 bytes
C │├╴text/plain 235 bytes
D │└╴image/jpeg attachment [foo.jpg] 352752 bytes
E └╴application/pgp-signature
lol, made my day!
Simon
On 05/16/2011 11:05 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/16/2011 04:50 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
So a message like this:
A└┬╴multipart/signed 355339 bytes
B ├┬╴multipart/mixed 353462 bytes
C │├╴text/plain 235 bytes
D │└╴image/jpeg attachment [foo.jpg] 352752 bytes
On 05/16/2011 05:20 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
Interestingly, this is not quite the behavior I get (with commit
373f352). With --format=text I'm now seeing:
2) C
3) D
4) E
--format=text should only show the parts that are readable in text.
the ultimate goal is to get the part numbers aligned
Jameson Graef Rollins wrote at 2011-05-16 11:52 -0500:
This is great, guys. I've been wanting to get something like this
working for a while now.
Yes; thanks Stewart, Thomas. This is one thing that has slowed my transition
to notmuch (from Mutt).
Perhaps some of this or links to it could be
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:07 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I'll have to learn better how to control the emacs mail composer in
order to understand how to get signatures to cover attachments if I want
to do that kind of thing.
See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire
On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:04:42 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
No, just the terms are, not the full string. (although for search, that
could actually be enough)
Right. It's easy enough to search on the To: field. But for address
completion, I think we realyl will want to fix
On Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as
opposed to just a single part.
Thanks! That's good to know. (Trying here.)
I think the two paths reconverge later in the series. Can
Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net writes:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu
wrote:
The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
without thinking
Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net writes:
This is great, guys. I've been wanting to get something like this
working for a while now.
Agreed. Would be awesome if someone could post it to the Wiki...
___
notmuch mailing list
50 matches
Mail list logo
