[Sorry, I'm flipping back and forth between mail clients at the moment and
I appear to have inadvertently marked a lot of mail as read that wasn't.]
Excerpts from Carl's message of Fri Dec 04 01:07:07 + 2009:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe wrote:
> > I had planned on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:17:12 +, "James Rowe" wrote:
> [Sorry, I'm flipping back and forth between mail clients at the moment and
> I appear to have inadvertently marked a lot of mail as read that
> wasn't.]
No worries. I don't even have the excuse of flipping back and forth, and
I keep
[Sorry, I'm flipping back and forth between mail clients at the moment and
I appear to have inadvertently marked a lot of mail as read that wasn't.]
Excerpts from Carl's message of Fri Dec 04 01:07:07 + 2009:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe wrote:
I had planned on
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:17:12 +, James Rowe jnr...@gmail.com wrote:
[Sorry, I'm flipping back and forth between mail clients at the moment and
I appear to have inadvertently marked a lot of mail as read that
wasn't.]
No worries. I don't even have the excuse of flipping back and forth, and
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:24:59 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> I actually really like having notmuch open right into my "inbox".
Well, at least that option won't ever go away. :-)
> I thought part of the point of notmuch was to get rid of the whole dump
> idea of folders!
There's certainly
Firstly, thanks for the full explanations!
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:04:52 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> The notmuch-folder command is definitely a nice primary interface to
> notmuch for some people. I'm seriously considering making it the view
> that one gets with "M-x notmuch" (after the
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> The notmuch-folder command is definitely a nice primary interface to
> notmuch for some people. I'm seriously considering making it the view
> that one gets with "M-x notmuch" (after the notmuch-folder view gets a
> little sprucing up).
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe wrote:
> I had planned on posting a patch for inclusion in packaging/Gentoo per
> Carl's mail[2], but the whole GPL 2 vs 3 thing made me put it on the
> backburner and I haven't looked again. Might still be useful to people
> unless there is going
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe wrote:
> I have to admit I played with elisp-make-autoload-file in my ebuild
> initially, but came to the conclusion there wasn't a great deal of
> purpose to exposing more than the main notmuch function. Mostly because
> it muddies my emacs and
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe jnr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to admit I played with elisp-make-autoload-file in my ebuild
initially, but came to the conclusion there wasn't a great deal of
purpose to exposing more than the main notmuch function. Mostly because
it muddies my
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +, James Rowe jnr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had planned on posting a patch for inclusion in packaging/Gentoo per
Carl's mail[2], but the whole GPL 2 vs 3 thing made me put it on the
backburner and I haven't looked again. Might still be useful to people
unless
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
The notmuch-folder command is definitely a nice primary interface to
notmuch for some people. I'm seriously considering making it the view
that one gets with M-x notmuch (after the notmuch-folder view gets a
little sprucing up).
I
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:27:00 -0800, Keith Amidon
wrote:
> I was interested in them because the gentoo packaging support for emacs
> includes the ability to automatically create autoloads from these
> comments for installed add-on packages that then get loaded system-wide
> when emacs is started.
{-- Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:06:45 -0800: Carl wrote: --}
Carl> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:08 -0800, camalot at picnicpark.org wrote:
Carl> I had a patch (on a side branch that I must have never merged)
Carl> that just removed these autoload comments. Do these even do
Carl> anything for a file
{-- Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:06:45 -0800: Carl cwo...@cworth.org wrote: --}
Carl On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:08 -0800, cama...@picnicpark.org wrote:
Carl I had a patch (on a side branch that I must have never merged)
Carl that just removed these autoload comments. Do these even do
Carl anything
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:08 -0800, camalot at picnicpark.org wrote:
> From: Keith Amidon
>
> The previous location of autoload comments didn't seem to correspond
> with the functions most likely to be the entry points for using
> notmuch. This change adjusts them to match those likely entry
From: Keith Amidon
The previous location of autoload comments didn't seem to correspond
with the functions most likely to be the entry points for using
notmuch. This change adjusts them to match those likely entry points.
---
notmuch.el |6 --
1 files changed, 4
From: Keith Amidon ke...@nicira.com
The previous location of autoload comments didn't seem to correspond
with the functions most likely to be the entry points for using
notmuch. This change adjusts them to match those likely entry points.
---
notmuch.el |6 --
1 files changed, 4
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:08 -0800, cama...@picnicpark.org wrote:
From: Keith Amidon ke...@nicira.com
The previous location of autoload comments didn't seem to correspond
with the functions most likely to be the entry points for using
notmuch. This change adjusts them to match those likely
19 matches
Mail list logo