Marcus, my personal opinion is that we have 2 x good reasons to remain
positive about our current plight, they are:
1. Albeit for the Burnley game we are regularly scoring 2 or 3 goals a
game. Granted our general play has been dismal, exceedingly so at times if
you are to believe all
You're having a laugh! You really think a carling cup match against an
under-strength blues side is reason to think we're going to get promoted ahead
of them. That's scraping the barrel.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue
Have you seen anything in the last month/2 months to suggest we are on our
way to improving our current predicament?
*Yes, we hammered our promotion rivals Birmingham in the cup in their own
back yard. That was about a month ago. If they are our only competition
for second spot then I'm not too
MC: You really think a carling cup match against an under-strength blues
side is reason to think we're going to get promoted ahead of them. That's
scraping the barrel.
It was the FA Cup and it was more or less the same side that they had played
in the previous few league games. The match
We hammered Brum with a team very different to MM's favoured eleven. He
went straight back to his favourites and the results speak for
themselves. I don't think that game was a good indicator.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Wolves derby clash moved
Wolves' potentially vital away clash at promotion rivals Birmingham has
been moved to Monday April 6 for Sky TV coverage (7:45pm).
As 6th April is my Birthday I now predict we'll win this one and this
will be the game that secures us promotion.
The information
Poor Miserable Dave, I know how it feels to be misunderstood ;-)
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 12:11 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Where
Interesting point Lee. This is the team that played that Birmingham match.
So you are suggesting that Mick should play this team rather than some of
his favourites?
Therefore you mean that we should play:
Dave Edwards instead of his favourite Foley at right back
George Friend on the left wing
I'm not suggesting anything of the kind, it was you who referred to this
result as a positive in this very negative period, yet the team that
played so positively wasn't our regular team.
His selections amaze me sometimes.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
If those players are the ones that got us the result why shouldn't they be
selected ahead of the favourites or the players that make sense to you? The
favourites have done f all to suggest they should retain their places. Put the
lads in who are hungry to prove themselves.
But you said that he went back to his favourites (which can only mean Foley
and Jarvis) and the results speak for themselves What else could you have
meant?
2009/2/18 Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
I'm not suggesting anything of the kind, it was you who referred to this
result as
OK, so if they proved themselves, why not pick them That's MM's
problem, no matter what certain players do, he does not play them.
Back to your original pointthe good performance you alluded to, was
achieved by different players to those that are plodding at the
momentThat result
As Paul states below, not only if we keep clean sheets, we may win some games,
but more importantly, we won't lose any or at least scrape a draw. Defence is
our key.
We were 6 points clear before our poor run of form. We are still now 3 points
clear. So whilst we've had a bad run, no one has
Fair enough Paul, but aren't you forgetting one little thing... all of
the chasing teams have games in hand over us so whilst we are 3 points
ahead, it has the potential to be false security as we an be caught by
other teams and overtaken by one of them (Reading) .
Dear All,
As a respite from the bickerings and current debate, would any of you be
interested in a game against my over 35's football team (Gladesville Sharks
Over 35's - 9's)?
They are pretty unfit so would appreciate a friendly warm up game before the
season starts. Gladesville can
Looking at the table, as it stands Reading are now favourites,
realistically the other spot should go to Us or Brum. Cardiff have a
terrible backlog of fixtures and it would take an amazing run of form
for them to reel us in. However should they beat us next week they may
not have to win all their
You're suggesting selecting:
Dave Edwards over Foley (who is thought to be the player of the season and
almost always has a good game)
George Friend over Jarvis
Collins over Berra (and you've slagged off Collins before. He's the most
hated player amongst Wolves fans from what I gather).
PLEASE!
It's OK. You can pick Friend, Edwards and Collins ahead of the other three
if you think that's what's best for the team.
I just wanted to clarify your thinking. Personally I wouldn't, but I know
where you stand on the team selection now.
2009/2/18 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
This thread started off on this tangent because I said that the Birmingham
game gave me hope in direct response to Marcus's request for something from
the last two months that gave me hope. I stand by that.
You then claimed that the Birmingham game was a poor indicator because MM
had gone back
Thanks Steve, just the two of us at the moment!
Paul Crowe
Australasian Sales Manager
ConTech (Sydney Office)
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW 2138
Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.com
Can't see any of the 2 x trio's of player's you mention forcing themselves
into a starting line up including the mad Vicar of Bundanoon and crazy
legs Millward!! Maybe a spot on the bench.
Seriously if the 29th is not good for some people, how about the 22nd of
March?
Regards
Paul.
21 matches
Mail list logo
