I'm very happy with an extra $3,000 a year in rates if my rental income goes
up by $1,000 a week.
On 28 January 2011 18:16, Rog & Reet wrote:
> Quadruple the rich git’s rates in the Eastern suburbs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behal
Quadruple the rich git's rates in the Eastern suburbs.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 5:47 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
Excellent idea. Then
Jules is from Victoria, but QLD is a state that poses a huge risk to her
government should an election be called.
I think this whole levy is known as pork-barrelling. Except it's my chops
that are going into the barrel and I want them back.
On 28 January 2011 09:20, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> Als
Excellent idea. Then no new homes will ever get built and my house will
escalate in value. I'll be able to move back to the UK and live off the rent
on my place.
It's not like you to have an idea that so favours those who have lots and
punishes those who have little but it's nice that you're fina
Anyway, it wont be long before Joolia upsets a couple of independents and
we'll have a hung parliament and another general election. lol.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Marcus Chantry <
marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
> Also Joolia, in the press, has chosen to emphasise that this is a levy
Slap a 99% tax on all property developers.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
As someone said to me yesterday, the
As someone said to me yesterday, the people who give planning permission
to build homes or businesses in flood prone areas should take some blame
so right back to the government.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jere
Also Joolia, in the press, has chosen to emphasise that this is a levy
to help Queensland rebuild. No mention of other areas affected (Vic,
NSW, Tas etc) and surely it is only a sheer coincidence that QLD is a
Labour state where Joolia and Swan came from?
This sets a dangerous precedent for an
I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You're right. And many of
them are uninsured because they live in flood prone areas and are,
therefore, by definition uninsurable. But what do you do when everything you
have, house and possessions, is destroyed. A $15,000 handout from the govt
won't
I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the
council will pay through a relief fund, and the govt will levy money, from
those who did pay for insurance (and who paid higher premiums because of
those who took the risk and didnt get insurance and got burned). Same
happened
She's dead in the water - just doesn't get it. Can someone explain to her
that the issue is not that we spend the money but rather where the money
comes from.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011
I think Gillard has made a huge gaffe with this one. The people have
spoken.
Double dissolution and let's get the Libs back in. They know what they're
doing.
On 28 January 2011 08:23, Jeremy Tonks wrote:
> It would be cheaper – and probably speed up the banking sector!
>
>
> ---
It would be cheaper - and probably speed up the banking sector!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Took all my will power
I'm with you apart from the private school bit - if we stopped funding them
the education system would collapse within 2 years. It's much cheaper to
make the rich richer than to try and bring everyone to the lowest common
denominator.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@
Took all my will power not to get political and mention Abbot wanting to go
back to stagecoach and carrier pigeons.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 8:59 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [
Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don’t they scrap things that really are useless?
Middle class welfare would be a
On 27 January 2011 19:42, Rog & Reet wrote:
> Why don’t they scrap things that really are useless?
>
> Middle class welfare would be a great start.
>
> Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
> money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioner
Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?
Middle class welfare would be a great start.
Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioners.
The billions wasted on stinking rich private and religi
18 matches
Mail list logo
