$1,000 a year in rates?
Is the joint in a favela or did Roozendaal do the rating valuation?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 6:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec
ailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 5:47 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
>
>
>
> Excellent idea. Then no new homes will ever get built and my house will
>
Quadruple the rich git's rates in the Eastern suburbs.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 5:47 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
Excellent idea.
spend
> $4b a year in foreign aid but can’t find anything in the kitty to support
> our “mates”.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
> *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:09 AM
> *To:* nswolves
:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:27 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
>
>
>
> As someone said to me yesterday, the people who give planning permission to
> build homes or businesses in flood prone areas should take some blame so
> ri
d anything in the kitty to support
> our “mates”.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
> *Sent:* Friday, 28 January 2011 9:09 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
&g
Slap a 99% tax on all property developers.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy [sec=unclassified]
As someone said to me yesterday
Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 08:09
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
I was half hoping no one would raise this nasty. You're right. And many
of them are uninsured because they live in flood prone areas and are,
therefore, by definition uninsurable. But
x27;t find anything in the
kitty to support our "mates".
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:09 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
I was half hoping no one wo
ttle to nothing.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark worrall
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 9:00 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the
council wil
I guess the lesson is dont waste your money paying for insurance as the
council will pay through a relief fund, and the govt will levy money, from
those who did pay for insurance (and who paid higher premiums because of
those who took the risk and didnt get insurance and got burned). Same
happened
28 January 2011 8:35 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
I think Gillard has made a huge gaffe with this one. The people have
spoken.
Double dissolution and let's get the Libs back in. They know what they're
doing.
On 28 January 2011 08:23, Jeremy Tonks
anking sector!
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet
> *Sent:* Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
>
>
>
&
It would be cheaper - and probably speed up the banking sector!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 10:03 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Took all my will p
o:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 7:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?
Middle class welfare would be a great start.
Health insurance subsidies that
: [BTMO] Flood levy
Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?
Middle class welfare would be a
Wondered whether you would take the bait Rog!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu Jan 27 19:42:36 2011
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don’t they scrap things that really are useless?
Middle class welfare would be a
legroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
> *Sent:* Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
>
>
>
> Why don’t they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going
, the same level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN
who can reduce my taxable income to less
> then $50k. Anyone know anyone?
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Jeremy Tonks
> *Sent:* Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:40 PM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subj
levy
Because that would be a good idea.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they
Because that would be a good idea.
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN
I reckon defence cuts are the way to go. Massive redundancy packages.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 15:26
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy
ursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy
And so true. They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by
2013 and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do
in this situation.
You can also guarantee that i
And so true. They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.
You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spu
25 matches
Mail list logo
