SS.tfm']='fonts/tfm/local/lines-arrows',
['hlxbi8r.tfm']='fonts/tfm/yandy/lucida-h',
['Icon
']={'source/local/EXAMS','source/local'},
['cmttu10.tfm']='fonts/tfm/local/lines-a
publishing of my latest version because Ruby texexec
had a bug that prevented lilypond from being called, I guess that's
gone, but I had no time to check yet. And I didn't adapt the module
to LilyPond 2.11, too. (2.10.2x should work.)
I don't know if inline LilyPond worked at any
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about font sizes. I had a bunch of missing \Delta
> symbols in inline math (e.g. $\Delta x$), which I tracked down to
>
> \setupbodyfont[10.5pt]
>
> The non-integral point size works for text but not for math (the \Delta
> turn
I'm a bit confused about font sizes. I had a bunch of missing \Delta
symbols in inline math (e.g. $\Delta x$), which I tracked down to
\setupbodyfont[10.5pt]
The non-integral point size works for text but not for math (the \Delta
turned into a backquote). How to fix that?
type-siz.te
will be much more layout options, as well as support
for units, chemistry, and complex formula building.
\StopText
\StartText
There is a \goto {MathML manual} [manual::], an \goto
{example suite} [suite::], and a \goto {experimentation
site} [site::]. And there will be more.
\St
Am 2007-04-03 um 09:20 schrieb Mari Voipio:
> Note! If your files contain graphics, for ConTeXt you have to ask
> people to send them in separately as pdf, png or jpg (instead of
> putting
> them inline in the Word file). I have found *this* hard to achieve
> once
> in a
s way, because Word's own html is totally
useless mess as it doesn't do css...]
Note! If your files contain graphics, for ConTeXt you have to ask
people to send them in separately as pdf, png or jpg (instead of putting
them inline in the Word file). I have found *this* hard to achiev
Thanks to all that replied. Comments inline.
On 3/30/07, Steffen Wolfrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:06:57 +0800, List Mail wrote:
> > I know this is a newbie question. However I have read the fine manual
> > (see below), and I still don't k
On Mar 12, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Dean wrote:
> I've just started using ConTeXt and I have run into a small problem
> that may be a bug. I'm trying to include a graphics file inline with
> text. For my page headers, I need the image to appear at the start of
> a line.
Dean wrote:
> I've just started using ConTeXt and I have run into a small problem
> that may be a bug. I'm trying to include a graphics file inline with
> text. For my page headers, I need the image to appear at the start of
> a line. If I use the following commands:
I've just started using ConTeXt and I have run into a small problem
that may be a bug. I'm trying to include a graphics file inline with
text. For my page headers, I need the image to appear at the start of
a line. If I use the following commands:
\externalimge[logo] Some text her
he two commands \increment\mycount to increase your own
> counter by one and the command \decrement\mycount to reduce your own
> counter by one.
There are also numbers, which I find easier to use. See
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Counters
>> 5) In mathematics, in context there are th
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> So, if I understand correctly, there is no difference between
> \mathop{...} and \mathop{...}\displaylimits.
Yes. /me was definately wrong
Cheers,
Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/li
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, M.J. Kallen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> this may have been mentioned before, but I haven't been able to find
>>> an answer to this: if I e.g. use $\lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} f(t)$,
>>> the subscript of \
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, M.J. Kallen wrote:
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>this may have been mentioned before, but I haven't been able to find
>>an answer to this: if I e.g. use $\lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} f(t)$,
>>the subscript of \lim appears underneath it, i.e. in displaystyle.
>>In
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, M.J. Kallen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this may have been mentioned before, but I haven't been able to find
> an answer to this: if I e.g. use $\lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} f(t)$,
> the subscript of \lim appears underneath it, i.e. in displaystyle.
> In LaTeX, it appears below right
Hi all,
this may have been mentioned before, but I haven't been able to find an answer
to this: if I e.g. use $\lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} f(t)$, the subscript of \lim
appears underneath it, i.e. in displaystyle. In LaTeX, it appears below right
of \lim, much like with $\sum_{i=1}$. The latter be
ay Magazine: Normal and Bold Math Combination by
Hans Hagen and I find that bold math in inline equation is bold upright
but in formula it is bold italics. Furthermore, I can't type a bold
greek
> symbol in an inline equation. A file test is below. I also tried in
Contextlive and got the s
ombination by
Hans Hagen and I find that bold math in inline equation is bold upright
but in formula it is bold italics. Furthermore, I can't type a bold greek
symbol in an inline equation. A file test is below. I also tried in
Contextlive and got the same result. I use the 23.01.2007 contex
wercase letters
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
\subject{Math}
An equation can be typeset inline like $e^{\pi i}+1=0$, or as a
displayed formula:
\startformula
\int_0^\infty t^4 e^{-t}\,dt = 24.
\stopformula
% don't use $$...$$ (the plain TeX equivalent)
You can also hav
s because of the loading order of files. For
> the time being, you can copy the definitions to cont-new.tex or to the
> top of your tex file.
>
such temp hacks go into cont-new indeed and when ok can go into a core
module
> Hans, what is the proper way of getting this to work. A
I just noticed this test file failing:
\starttext
$f'(x)$
\startformula
f^\prime(x)\quad f'(x)
\stopformula
\stoptext
It gives:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.4 f^\prime(x)\quad f'
(x)
As you can see from lack of complaint about $f'(x)$, the ' s
>
>> 1. Is there an automated way to place citations into footnotes? So
>> whenever I use \cite in the running text it should produce a footnote
>> with the reference alongside the usual footnotes. However, when \cite
>> is invoked within a footnote it should just type out the
ote
> with the reference alongside the usual footnotes. However, when \cite
> is invoked within a footnote it should just type out the reference
> inline (in the footnote, of course ;-). So far I've done this
> manually with \footnote{\cite{key}} (which at times produced it
wever, when \cite
is invoked within a footnote it should just type out the reference
inline (in the footnote, of course ;-). So far I've done this
manually with \footnote{\cite{key}} (which at times produced its own
strange results like two footnote blocks on the same page).
2. When typ
;
Hm. Just typeset fontstrips, scale the doc up/down on the screen and
find the best visual match. You need to do that only once for a given
combination of fonts. In most cases i use lm for monospaced and palatino
for math when combined with other fonts, and my experience is that one
really
Thanks Aditya and Wolfgang for the information. I've added it all to
the wiki <http://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF_Bookmarks_and_Headers> so
let me know if you find any problems there. I noticed two possible
bugs when trying out a few examples -- see below.
>> If I inline the \
setupinteraction[state=start]
> > \placebookmarks[chapter]
> > \setupinteractionscreen[option=bookmark]
> >
> > \setuphead[chapter][before={\bgroup\def\1{\hfil\break}}, after={\egroup}]
> >
> > \starttext
> > \chapter{Long\1 title}
> > hello
> >
> > \st
fil\break}}, after={\egroup}]
>
> \starttext
> \chapter{Long\1 title}
> hello
>
> \stoptext
> ==
> If I inline the \1, as in \chapter{Long\hfil\break title}, then it's
> mostly fine except that the b
[chapter]
\setupinteractionscreen[option=bookmark]
\setuphead[chapter][before={\bgroup\def\1{\hfil\break}}, after={\egroup}]
\starttext
\chapter{Long\1 title}
hello
\stoptext
==
If I inline the \1, as in \chapter{Long\hfil\break
example tex code is placed inline in
a message, unless it needs attaching due to strange character codes or
whitespace issues, in which case quoted-printable encoding makes it
easier to scan than base64 encoding does.)
>From an earlier message in this thread:
Here is an example that I put on
gt;>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
>>>>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color).
>>>>>
>>>> \setupcolors[st
On 10/25/06, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> >> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> How can I define a command t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
>>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in co
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
>> discussion on this in the past,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
> discussion on this in the past, and Taco had suggested a solution
>
> http://archive.con
Hi,
How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
\stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
discussion on this in the past, and Taco had suggested a solution
http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050907.093522.baf795f5.en.html
which is
.. \NC ... \NR
\stopalign \stopformula
I think that it is possible to add such a macro. I will try to do this
when a bit later in the week.
[1] By design, TeX is very intelligent when it comes to line breaking
of text and inline math, but does nothing about line breaking of
display math. It will be nice (
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>
> My hypothesis was refuted by testing the rectangle. I had hoped (if
> that's the right word) that the internal conversion was using the width
> where it should have used the height, which is why the ellipse would
> cause problems. Which is why I tried the square, and it
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If test.mp draws a square or rectangle instead of an ellipse, then
> > there's no difference (both versions of test.tex work).
> looks like a bbox error
I didn't think so, because after mptopdf got hold of the figure, the
whitespace around the figure was
btw, a convenient way to visualize such thing sis:
\placefigure[force,none]{}{\externalfigure[test.1][frame=on]}
\placefigure[force,none]{}{\externalfigure[test-1.pdf][frame=on]}
i.e. it was not related to spacing around the float, but a problem in
the rewrite of core-fig
-
Hi
in core-fig.tex patch:
\def\dogetfiguresizeeps
{\dogetEPSboundingbox\wantedfigurefullname\!!widtha\!!heighta\!!widthb\!!heightb
\xdef\analyzedfigurewidth {\the\!!widthb}%
\xdef\analyzedfigureheight{\the\!!heightb}}
somehow i assumed that i was dealing with bbox values
thanks for tes
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>
> If test.mp draws a square or rectangle instead of an ellipse, then
> there's no difference (both versions of test.tex work).
>
looks like a bbox error
Hans
-
H
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> I'm using the 2006.09.26 beta, and noticed an extra gap before some
> external metapost figures. Here is a small test:
>
> test.mp =
> beginfig(1)
> draw fullcircle scaled (0.75in) xscaled 1.5;
> endfig;
> end
> ===
I'm using the 2006.09.26 beta, and noticed an extra gap before some
external metapost figures. Here is a small test:
test.mp =
beginfig(1)
draw fullcircle scaled (0.75in) xscaled 1.5;
endfig;
end
==
I had wondered:
> only the label that is directly in the figure ("Inline in the
> figure.") comes out in 7pt. The other one, produced by the drawtext
> macro, comes out in 12pt.
> A possible solution is to put the verbatimtex at the beginning of
> the mp file or after
;
\stopMPinclusions
\startstaticMPfigure{fig}
drawtext;
label(btex Inline in the figure. etex, (2in,0));
\stopstaticMPfigure
hello, in 12pt, for comparison.
\placefigure[force,none]{}{\usestaticMPfigure[fig]}
\stoptext
=== cut here
However
the same size, but they don't. Any ideas why this might be?
This is very weird but I noticed the problem might be because I am
using inline Math in the captions. The caption of the entire
combination has mixed test and math and the size of the math is larger
than the text
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> But if I inline the environment file, to get
>
> \startenvironment ne
> \setupindenting[medium,yes]
> \stopenvironment
> \starttext
> \placeformula\startformula
> x = 10
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> then texexec doesn't pro
ptext
texexec'ing test.tex says:
Overfull \hbox (17.62474pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 4--4
[][]
But if I inline the environment file, to get
\startenvironment ne
\setupindenting[medium,yes]
\stopenvironment
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
x = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
then texex
equation number, but pushed to the left edge of the page
>> (I probably should say text area).
>>
>> Possible?
>
> It should be possible to do this using a special version of \startalign,
> but I cannot figure it out. Maybe Aditya can help?
Here is one solution. Explaina
an I extract the color from
\setupGNUPLOT[foregroundcolor=yellow] and store it to a variable
"color gp_foregroundcolor;" defined in a module?
Any other thoughts about it?
> > A question for you or Hans: can please someone explain me in a few
> > words what's the main strateg
exactly how TeX processes it (and metapost
> shrinks/expands/shifts/colors) it inline.
TeX typesets the argument of the \sometxt macro in a hbox and
writes its box dimensions to .
To the metapost file, a zero-padded serial number is written
instead, and MP uses the dimensions it finds in
fo
w
words what's the main strategy/philosophy behind \sometxt. I don't
understand exactly how TeX processes it (and metapost
shrinks/expands/shifts/colors) it inline.
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
can imagine that you also got the files "garbled"
just as I did (I mean: written inline instead of getting attachments
unless you downloaded your mail with some program):
0. not necessary [texmfstart] ctxtools --update
(although I had problems downloading the latest beta)
1. check if
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> Why does \startframedtext does not honor the outside setting
> by \setupwhitespace?
Because its contents are most often used as a kind of
inline figure, where normal paragraph spacing does not
apply.
Greetings, Taco
_
milar before the code
actually shows the integral instead of a plus sign, but Wim can
figure that out himself, no doubt :-)
- somehow display and inline math render differently; something for taco
That is normal. One is with an operator with \limits, one without.
- first extend the math collection (use decimen, since there is a linesplit bug with " here)
I will implement your suggestion, thanks
- then load the times font
- somehow display and inline math render differently; something for taco
\startMPenvironment[global]
\startmathcoll
y shows the integral instead of a plus sign, but Wim can
figure that out himself, no doubt :-)
> - somehow display and inline math render differently; something for taco
That is normal. One is with an operator with \limits, one without.
Taco
___
n
> p := p scaled 0.15cm;
> draw p;
> \stopMPcode
> \stoptext
>
make sure that mp knows about the definitions:
- first extend the math collection (use decimen, since there is a linesplit bug
with " here)
- then load the times font
- somehow display and inline math rend
hat ConTeXt parses the
metapost output inline, doable since metapost puts out such a
restricted subset of postscript. So it is easy (at least for tex
wizards!) to integrate metapost with ConTeXt (i.e. for inline metapost
code, like the asymptote environment in latex). The asymptote eps
files, be
gt;>> The left and right are not in setupreferencing.
>>
>
> I finally came up with this, a bit of a kludge I admit:
> \let\originalin=\in
> \definereferenceformat[parenthesizedin][left=(,right=),command=
> \originalin]
> \let\in=\parenthesizedin
Be careful with t
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> When doing inline math I see that the mathsize does adapt when \tfa,
> \tfb, etc are used, but not for \tfx and \tfxx. That seems strange to
> me, because in the manual in the font table \tfx \tfxx \tfa etc. are
> advertised as equivalent operati
When doing inline math I see that the mathsize does adapt when \tfa, \tfb, etc are used, but not for \tfx and \tfxx. That seems strange to me, because in the manual in the font table \tfx \tfxx \tfa etc. are advertised as equivalent operations. It also accounts for a lot more typing (and mistakes
-06-07 ones
did texhash
did texmfstart texexec --make en nl
checked format versions
typesetting not ok
Now many things having to do with metapost go wrong, among these:
textext, (inline) textbackground.
5. move out the context base files in tex/context/base
e they retain the
structure cq. mathematical concepts while for tex/presentation mml it's a kind
of gamble what the formula represents
we currently are involved in a project where math is dealt with as follows:
- open math for complex math (converted to content mml)
- simple inline el
> oops, cloned [figures],
Ah, thanks.
For inline figures, 'here' will place it here if possible, otherwise
float to the next page. Is there an equivalent of 'here' for margin
figures ('marginhere'?)?
With 'margin', they float completely so are n
things and a tex speciality which takes
> while to get accustomed to; a similar case is
>
> {\bf whatever} rest of par
Hello Hans,
I tried this:
\setupindenting[big,yes]
\starttext
\input tufte
{\bf whatever} rest of par
\input tufte
\stoptext
But I don't see the problem... ?
>
teach them about things like \dontleavehmode
> there is no need for further efforts. So, such a switch would be very
> welcome (I would put it into cont-sys.tex)!
>
but then it would break other things and your collegues would scream about that
btw, there is \inframed
From:Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> \definecommand k {\buildtextogonek}
> (but i knew what to look for)
Now I do too. I'll add that alternative to future egrep regexps.
> \unexpanded\def\k{\mathortext\kappa{\dohandleaccent{k}}}
Thanks, that works.
-Sanjoy
`Never underestimate th
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> \starttext
> $\k T$
> \stoptext
>
> The above test file, to my surprise, compiled fine. [In Plain TeX I
> usually define \k as \kappa, but I had forgotten to carry over that
> definition.] The pdf output showed a T with little hook as a subscript.
>
> I can redefine \k a
\starttext
$\k T$
\stoptext
The above test file, to my surprise, compiled fine. [In Plain TeX I
usually define \k as \kappa, but I had forgotten to carry over that
definition.] The pdf output showed a T with little hook as a subscript.
I can redefine \k as \kappa, but that might overwrite an im
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> In inline math, \to works fine (produces a right arrow), but in a figure
> caption all hell breaks loose.
>
> The culprit may be this redefinition of \to in enco-ini.tex:
>
> $ find texmf -name '*.tex' |xargs egrep
In inline math, \to works fine (produces a right arrow), but in a figure
caption all hell breaks loose.
The culprit may be this redefinition of \to in enco-ini.tex:
$ find texmf -name '*.tex' |xargs egrep -n '\\((e|g|)def|let)\\to\b'
texmf/tex/context/base/core-pos
.asy
> --- a/base/babel.asy Tue Feb 07 23:34:29 2006 -0500
> +++ b/base/babel.asy Tue Apr 25 00:28:42 2006 -0400
> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ void babel(string s)
> void babel(string s)
> {
> + if (texengine == "tex")
> +abort("No babel package in plain TeX."
s it on (no
> copyright) in case others find it useful. I used variants for a decade
> with the old tex mode, but just rewrote it for auctex and for context's
> display math syntax (which deprecates $$...$$).
>
> The purpose:
>
> 1. If you type {, [, or (, the appropriate ri
[, or (, the appropriate right delimiter is inserted
for you and the insertion point is placed between them. So I never
get unbalanced XYZ errors. If you think it's a misfeature, delete
the last three local-set-key's in the TeX-mode-hook.
2. Same feature if you type $ for inlin
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Since you seem to be working on this: when using inline physml I noticed
> that
> 1
> when used in a figure caption formated like this:
> \setupcaptions[style=small,width=\textwidth]
>
> does not scale properly - it remains at 1
Hans,
Since you seem to be working on this: when using inline physml I noticed
that
1
when used in a figure caption formated like this:
\setupcaptions[style=small,width=\textwidth]
does not scale properly - it remains at 12pt, since
\setupbodyfont[12pt,modern].
Joh
Hans Hagen wrote
Hi,
On Mon 20.03.2006 11:40, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>you can also think of a mixture: content mathml for nicely structured
>formulas and a simple tex mode for inline math:
[nice testcode snipped]
>(i will provide a 'calcmath' filter once luatex is there)
Thanx for expl
tter. But if you prefer to
> type in your formulas,the tex way is much easier to input.
>
you can also think of a mixture: content mathml for nicely structured
formulas and a simple tex mode for inline math:
\defineXMLargument[tm]{\XMLtexmath}
\def\XMLtexmath#1{\bgroup\setnormalcatcodes\scan
I've been trying to make some notes on typesetting math in ConTeXt,
and using nath seems the way to go. An odd thing about using \binom
with nath: in displayed equations, it works fine, in inline
equations, \binom{1}{2} will typeset "1(2)" (with a raised "2").
Johan Sandblom wrote:
I think possibly that the reason for the sparse syntax highlighting is
the higher frequency of inline definitions in ConTeXt, making it
impossible to keep up with it. I think it should be parsable, but
requires emacs-lisp skills way beyond mine.
it's not that hard;
possible to
automate using mmm, but I never tried.
> 4. You know advanded features I must know ? ;-)
There is TeX debugging just as for LaTeX, automatically locating the
error in the source and explaining it.
I think possibly that the reason for the sparse syntax highlighting is
the higher fr
ements for different
types of what ConTeXt calls typing: for inline code fragments,
for something you invoke (use for its options and
for the placeholders to be replaced by actual values),
should be obvious but there are also and
– the difference is a bit subtle; programmers might also
use , , ,
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
ther. So, would this way save or gain anything? (Besides, I still
have the hope that I could somehow ask lilypond to tell me some sort of
baseline, for inline material. I don't expect that to work well with
its pdf output.)
why not ask the author of lil
Cobby,
In amsmath, there is
\begin{smallmatrix}
\end{smallmatrix}
Don't know how in Context. I'll find out.
Does anyone on the context list know how to do this?
On Sep 17, 2005, at 6:35 PM, Jacob Miles-Prystowsky wrote:
Dave,
Quick TeX question for you:
How do I produce a sm
oing probably requires a gs installation anyway. I don't think
lilypond creates pdf of better quality than texutil does from the eps,
either. So, would this way save or gain anything? (Besides, I still
have the hope that I could somehow ask lilypond to tell me some sort of
baseline, for inline m
g options never raise an error anyway).
I reported this bug back in April but no one replied. The problem is
that the first character is read and then not given back the right
catcode so that the typing stuff can process it correctly.
This mainly affected me when I was trying to write inline C c
Hello,
How can I make highlighted \type-d text?
I would like \type{\thisTeXcommand[option=something]} to be
highlighted in TEX style.
(The question could also be relevant for the wiki, where inline text
can only be "highlighted" with or , but not with something
similar to or .)
Tobias Wolf wrote:
Hey,
what do you people actually think about E. Tufte's Sparklines?²
They are a great and innovative thing in my mind; both in the
information mediating and the typographic sense.
Can you be a bit more specific? You mean small and/or condense inline graphics? (b
ovp and vptovf programs in detail. And I am so miserable at
> that; all kinds of optimizations that makes the code unreadable.
:)
> > Let me extend the suggestion, for we miss a ConTeXt test suite for a
> > long time now:
> >
> > - users send test cases
> > - te
a
> long time now:
>
> - users send test cases
> - test cases get typeset with the actual ConTeXt and converted to PNG
> (like inline samples)
> - user "votes" if it looks right, if not adds comment
> - test case gets saved, including PNG, ConTeXt version and vote/comm
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 at 23:56:53+0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >>how do you define the graphic?
> >
> >\startreusableMPgraphic{kreis}
> > fill fullcircle scaled 1cm withcolor red;
> >\stopreusableMPgraphic
> >\starttext
> > \reuseMPgraphic{kreis}
> >\stoptext
> >
> >When I remove 'withcolor red
It still doesn't work here. There have been complaints about arguments
not numeric on line 1889, but changing == to eq had no influence on the
final result. Still need an additional run.
As you said, the problem does not occur when you use runtime MP
processing, and would have gone unnoticed if
make it easier to discover any broken
functionality.
Oh, another quest for our magic Patrick! ;-)
Let me extend the suggestion, for we miss a ConTeXt test suite for a
long time now:
- users send test cases
- test cases get typeset with the actual ConTeXt and converted to PNG
(like inline
-
www/lilypond/LilyPond_002dbook.html
I'd like to see (and use) a similar integration with ConTeXt - I
guess it's similar to MetaPost integration:
- support for inline code, i.e. \startLilyPond (LilyPond code)
\stopLilyPond or \LilyPond{short code sample}
- support for complete files (the
Eckhart Guthöhrlein wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 at 17:21:56+0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
when I change inline MP graphics, these are not recreated during the
subsequent texexec run. I need to call texexec once again to have them
refreshed.
I have just installed a new box, but I think I have
l
I'd like to see (and use) a similar integration with ConTeXt - I
guess it's similar to MetaPost integration:
- support for inline code, i.e. \startLilyPond (LilyPond code)
\stopLilyPond or \LilyPond{short code sample}
- support for complete files (there's \lilypondfile in the
broken
functionality.
Oh, another quest for our magic Patrick! ;-)
Let me extend the suggestion, for we miss a ConTeXt test suite for a
long time now:
- users send test cases
- test cases get typeset with the actual ConTeXt and converted to PNG
(like inline samples)
- user "votes&q
701 - 800 of 853 matches
Mail list logo
