On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Janko Hauser wrote:
> As I do not understand fonts at all, but is it really so, that one
> needs to have the bold fontpackage if one wants to set a word in
> bold in tex? Asked another way, can tex not do the same as word in
> this regard?
>
> with regards,
>
>
Am 14.02.2007 um 11:34 schrieb Jörg Hagmann:
I am editing the Annual Report of an ornithological society. In the
past, this has been done with Word, the font was Gentium. I haven't
changed to ConTeXt yet, because Gentium has no bold version and I
want to stick with the same font (Word produces
>
> There is one [ too many in this definition... Don't be too
> embarrassed, when you've looked at a file or a line for three hours,
> you don't see anything anymore.
Thanks a lot. I AM embarassed, especially since I suspected something
of the sort but didn't see it. And also because I successf
On Feb 13, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Jörg Hagmann wrote:
> Let me try again:
> After installing the LinLibertine and the Junicode fonts,
> everything works (including bolditalic) except the bold version.
>
> - System: ubuntu, minimal tex/context installation
>
> - I followed the instructions by T. Sch
Let me try again:
After installing the LinLibertine and the Junicode fonts, everything
works (including bolditalic) except the bold version.
- System: ubuntu, minimal tex/context installation
- I followed the instructions by T. Schmitz (Practex Journal 2005:
Integrating TrueType Fonts into
Hi all,
I have installed the LinLibertine and Junicode fonts on Linux Ubuntu,
minimal tex version. They only work if I comment out the lines
concerning the Bold versions of the fonts in my type-scripts. With
those lines, the error is:
ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.23 13:32 MKII fmt: 2007.2.4 int:
