Am 20.11.2011 um 00:56 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
I have a tex file that looks like follows:
\startsection[title=...][review=yes]
...
\stopsection
\startsection[title=...][review=no]
...
\stopsection
When I compile the document with --mode=review, I want that all
Can someone confirm this? It seems that the equation reference mechanism is
broken some time in the recent past.
I have a small example done in
(1) ConTeXt ver: 2011.07.13 20:14 MKIV
(2) ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.17 23:31 MKIV
These are respectively the first and last pdf's below.
If true, it is
Dear Hans,
Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 12:29 +0100 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
Can someone confirm this? It seems that the equation reference mechanism is
broken some time in the recent past.
I have a small example done in
(1) ConTeXt ver: 2011.07.13 20:14 MKIV
(2) ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.17
Hi,
hm, I should place a table of contents at the end of my document.
When issuing:
\startsubject[title=Inhoud]
\placelist[section]
\stopsubject
I get the section title but no TOC
When issuing only
\completelist[section]
I get the TOC but no section title.
Do I have to setup this
Hi,
hm, I should place a table of contents at the end of my document.
When issuing:
\startsubject[title=Inhoud]
\placelist[section]
\stopsubject
I get the section title but no TOC
When issuing only
\completelist[section]
I get the TOC but no section title.
Do I have to setup this
Hallo Wolfgang,
thank syou so much for the immediate reply. - Both switches result in placing
the content with \startsubject[] \placlist[section][criteium=all] \sotpsubject
Willi
On 20 Nov 2011, at 13:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi,
hm, I should place a table of contents at the end of my
I have the following question about references.
Using for example \at one can say somehting like see on \at{page}[ref] for the
figure..
But when the figure is one the same page it seems a bit superfluous to
reference to it. In the same manner it is a bit of an overkill to put a
hyperlink to
I see that a \pagereference[ref:a] gets a link to it with \at{see}[ref:a]. But
when I click on it, the jump to that page is not made. Not in Adobe Reader, nor
in Apple's Preview.
Is that the intended behaviour? Is it something I am doing wrong? Or what?
Hans van der Meer
Either in a separate column or in lieu of `cm'. For us those of us on the left
hand side of the Atlantic, and who struggle with decimal numbers ;)?
advTHANKSance.
--
-
- Pavneet Arora
___
If your question is
There is a python script called impressive
(http://impressive.sourceforge.net/) that adds some eyecandy to
presentations. One of the features that it has is an overview screen at
the end, like this: http://impressive.sourceforge.net/oview.png
This is similar to the overview screen used in the
Am 20.11.2011 um 18:46 schrieb Hans van der Meer:
I have the following question about references.
Using for example \at one can say somehting like see on \at{page}[ref] for
the figure..
But when the figure is one the same page it seems a bit superfluous to
reference to it. In the same
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 um 00:56 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Hi,
I have a tex file that looks like follows:
\startsection[title=...][review=yes]
...
\stopsection
\startsection[title=...][review=no]
...
\stopsection
When I compile the document
Dear ConTeXt folks,
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
\starttext
Using ^2:
\placeformula
\startformula
\left( a + b \right)^2 = a² + 2ab + b²
\stopformula
\placeformula
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:52 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
Yes it is, to enable this feature you need the “mathcrap” module.
Wolfgang
___
If
Dear ConTeXt folks,
there must be a regression between
ConTeXt ver: 2011.05.18 18:04 MKIV fmt: 2011.7.24 int: english/english
and
ConTeXt ver: 2011.10.14 22:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.10.15 int: english/english.
Using the minimal example
\starttext
\placeformula
Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:52 schrieb Paul Menzel:
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
Yes it is, to enable this feature you need the “mathcrap” module.
Thank you for the quick answer, but ² is still not
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:18:33PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:52 schrieb Paul Menzel:
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
Yes it is, to enable this feature you need the
On 20-11-2011 19:04, Pavneet Arora wrote:
Either in a separate column or in lieu of `cm'. For us those of us on
the left hand side of the Atlantic, and who struggle with decimal
numbers ;)?
Weren't you supposed to drop inches already for some decades? Anyhow,
the next beta will provide:
On 20-11-2011 20:31, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:18:33PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2011, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:52 schrieb Paul Menzel:
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
Yes it is, to
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:37 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
There is a python script called impressive
(http://impressive.sourceforge.net/) that adds some eyecandy to
presentations. One of the features that it has is an overview screen at the
end, like this: http://impressive.sourceforge.net/oview.png
Thanks Wolfgang for the code.
Just in case it is of use I concocted my variation on this theme. Now this
simply replaces the \in, \at and \about macro's with one that does not show on
the page where the link originates, but behaves as of old everywhere else. I
introduced the unskip in order
Am 20.11.2011 um 21:26 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Thanks Wolfgang for the code.
Just in case it is of use I concocted my variation on this theme. Now this
simply replaces the \in, \at and \about macro's with one that does not show
on the page where the link originates, but behaves as of
On 18/11/2011, at 10:00 PM, Pontus Lurcock p...@talvi.net wrote:
On Fri 18 Nov 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
so, best is that those asking for it come up with a list of issues:
which symbols need this option, is it language related or whatever,
so that i can do them all at once. We can already have
23 matches
Mail list logo
