Thank you, Wolfgang. I have find the new simplefonts can solve these
problems after i posted that mail. This is a good news for me athough it
appeared for a long time.
--
Best regards,
Li Yanrui (李延瑞)
___
If your que
Am 08.01.2014 um 03:23 schrieb Li Yanrui (李延瑞) :
> Hi,
>
> i find the quotation marks in those chinese fallback fonts can not work as
> before. They always be replaced with the latin fonts. please see the
> following example:
>
> \definefontsynonym[pagella][name:texgyrepagellaregular]
> \defi
Hi,
i find the quotation marks in those chinese fallback fonts can not work as
before. They always be replaced with the latin fonts. please see the
following example:
\definefontsynonym[pagella][name:texgyrepagellaregular]
\definefontfallback[song][name:adobesongstd][0x00400-0x2FA1F]
\definefonts
On 1/7/2014 9:58 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
[...]
Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will
On 01/07/2014 08:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> [...]
> Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
> proliferated to the distribution already.)
Many thanks for your help, Mojca.
I tried and it seems that I still have the issue.
I will check tomorrow again.
Pablo
--
http://w
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
>
>
> A mismatch between ... and ... ?
He was using luajittex 0.77.0 which is apparently too old already.
Mojca
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 00:40:28 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 5:12 PM, hwit...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > Can MKIV ConTeXt output image files. I need
> > to create an image file from a document and
> > would prefer use Context to output it
> > directly if possible and not have to conve
On 1/7/2014 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.
A mismatch between ... and ... ?
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 |
On 1/7/2014 8:04 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
able to recreate it.
I
Am 07.01.2014 um 20:39 schrieb Elspeth McGullicuddy
:
> The files like tfm, afm, pfb,... seem to be found alright by "mtxrun
> --script fonts --reload" when they are in the ${HOME}/texmf/fonts/
> tree, so I think I can leave them there.
Yes but the tfm and vf files are only needed for the math
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 4:35 AM, Elspeth McGullicuddy wrote:
>
>> The Garamond-math one might be that: "mdugm-math.lfg:
>>
>> return {
>> name = "mdugm-math",
>> version = "1.00",
>> comment = "Math fonts that complement URW Garamond.",
>>
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> [...]
> Which one is preferable:
Hello everyone,
I'm using ConTeXt to write a technical manual and I'm facing with some
strange behavior I don't know how to overcome.
I need a multipage table and I'm using the xtables. This is a (stripped
down) version of a part of my document:
\mainlanguage [en]
\setupxtable
[externaldocs]
On 01/07/2014 07:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
>> be broken. When removing tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache, context isn’t
>> able to recreate it.
>>
>> If I try to recreate it manually
On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>>
>>> both should work although at some
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>
>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
>> specific functiona
On 1/7/2014 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
specific functionality
there will be a luaji
On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>
> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
> specific functionality
>
> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is alr
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:43:51 +0100
Hans Hagen wrote:
> It all depends on it being floats or not (floatign indeed). One
> option is to package a set of floats in a bTABLE .. eTABLE and put
> a..z subcaptions under it that way and then have the whole as a float
Well, I actually don't need floats, b
On 1/7/2014 4:35 AM, Elspeth McGullicuddy wrote:
The Garamond-math one might be that: "mdugm-math.lfg:
return {
name = "mdugm-math",
version = "1.00",
comment = "Math fonts that complement URW Garamond.",
author = "Hans, Mojca, Aditya",
copyright = "ConTeXt development
20 matches
Mail list logo
