Re: [NTG-context] \externalfigure and file size

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:25, Kip Warner wrote: > > In other situations, I find that for images that are not so important, > they would benefit from ConTeXt rasterizing them when they are imported. > The reason for this is I find some vector images get enormously bloated > when they are typeset.

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with "location=left" (at least) of setlayer

Many thanks Wolfgang. -- Cédric Le 18 janv. 2012 à 21:51, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit : > > Am 18.01.2012 um 21:34 schrieb Cedric Mauclair: > >> Hi Hans, hi list, >> >> >> The following example shouts at me (something about >> "\syst_boxes_with_next_box", "\pack_layers..." and a bunch of oth

[NTG-context] xtable formatting issues

Hi, I’ve been experimenting a bit with converting some natural tables into xtables and ran across two issues. The first has to do with nested xtables and settings. In particular, if you attempt to set a cell’s width on the internal table using \setupxtable the option is lost. In the below exa

[NTG-context] \externalfigure and file size

Hey list, I have a number of \externalfigure commands to typeset some svg images. This is often handy to have them vectorized because it allows for the user to zoom in on diagrams of great detail. In other situations, I find that for images that are not so important, they would benefit from ConT

Re: [NTG-context] bold is not working (simplefonts)

Am 19.01.2012 um 00:27 schrieb Jan Heinen: > Hello, > > I want to get bold text - without "simplefonts" it is working - with > "simplefonts" it does not work. > What is wrong and what do I have to do? The module can’t find italic, bold etc. alternatives when don’t match a certain name pattern

[NTG-context] bold is not working (simplefonts)

Hello, I want to get bold text - without "simplefonts" it is working - with "simplefonts" it does not work. What is wrong and what do I have to do? My example: \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont[Allerlight] \starttext This is not bold! {\bf Is this bold?} This is not bold! \stoptext Regar

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with letter module

Am 18.01.2012 um 21:14 schrieb Romain Diss: > Hi, > > I am writing a letter with the 'letter' module (mkiv and last beta) and the > \encl{} command doesn't work anymore. I know that the module has been > rewriten > recently but I can't find any doc or examples of the new syntax. I tried to >

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 00:12 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > When there would be a predefined description command I would prefer > \description > and \startdescription but not \definition but it’s hard to say which command > should > be available by default everyone has a different opinion. Tha

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing a \startdefinition

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 08:36 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > \startdefinition[des:some]{Some Definition} > > \stopdefinition > > \in{Definition}[des:some] > > Wolfgang Hey Wolfgang. That works, but in the text I would just see linkable text "Definition" which is fine for online viewing, but fo

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

Am 19.01.2012 um 00:03 schrieb Kip Warner: > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 23:58 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> When you define a new command with \definedescription, e.g. >> \definedescription[definition] you get the commands >> >>\definition >> >> and >> >> \startdefinition >> >> Both ar

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 23:58 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > When you define a new command with \definedescription, e.g. > \definedescription[definition] you get the commands > > \definition > > and > >\startdefinition > > Both are only shortcuts for \dodescription[definition] and >

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 11:44 +0900, Vladimir Lomov wrote: > Actually Vladimir, Vlad is usually used as short for Vladislav. Except in the case of my buddy Vlad(imir) here in Vancouver ;) > >> (not an expert, just read command reference) > >>> (1) What is the difference between \definedescription a

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

Am 18.01.2012 um 23:39 schrieb Kip Warner: > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:26 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Am 18.01.2012 um 02:47 schrieb Kip Warner: >> >>> Ah, so \setupdescriptions inherits the default values of >>> \definedescription? >> >> WIth \definedescription you create a new command (

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 09:26 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Am 18.01.2012 um 02:47 schrieb Kip Warner: > > > Ah, so \setupdescriptions inherits the default values of > > \definedescription? > > WIth \definedescription you create a new command (e.g. \definition) and > environment (e.g. \startde

Re: [NTG-context] \par in macro definition (mkii issue)

On 18 janv. 2012, at 23:07, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > […] > This is a limitation of the MkII version of the \define command, you can’t > use \par in the replacement text but you can use \endgraf which does also end > a paragraph. > > Wolfgang Thanks Wolfgang: indeed \def\MyTest#1{The

Re: [NTG-context] \par in macro definition (mkii issue)

Am 18.01.2012 um 22:59 schrieb Otared Kavian: > Hi, > > It seems that with the recent updates, I found that the following minimal > example does not work in mkii, while it does in mkiv: > > \define[1]\MyTest{The test variable is #1.\par} > > \starttext > Is this a bug in mkii? > \MyTest{3} >

[NTG-context] \par in macro definition (mkii issue)

Hi, It seems that with the recent updates, I found that the following minimal example does not work in mkii, while it does in mkiv: \define[1]\MyTest{The test variable is #1.\par} \starttext Is this a bug in mkii? \MyTest{3} \stoptext Am I doing something wrong, or mkii has changed despite be

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with "location=left" (at least) of setlayer

Am 18.01.2012 um 21:34 schrieb Cedric Mauclair: > Hi Hans, hi list, > > > The following example shouts at me (something about > "\syst_boxes_with_next_box", "\pack_layers..." and a bunch of other > stuff) if I uncomment the "location=left" part ("right" and others are > fine): supp-box.mkiv (l

[NTG-context] Problem with "location=left" (at least) of setlayer

Hi Hans, hi list, The following example shouts at me (something about "\syst_boxes_with_next_box", "\pack_layers..." and a bunch of other stuff) if I uncomment the "location=left" part ("right" and others are fine): % Example below \definelayer[page][x=0pt, y=0pt] \setupbackgrounds [page] [backg

[NTG-context] Problem with letter module

Hi, I am writing a letter with the 'letter' module (mkiv and last beta) and the \encl{} command doesn't work anymore. I know that the module has been rewriten recently but I can't find any doc or examples of the new syntax. I tried to look at the source code but it doesn't help. So is there an

Re: [NTG-context] two problems with natural tables

This worked perfectly, thanks! Brian On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:47 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 18-1-2012 05:19, Brian Landy wrote: >> Hi, sorry to dredge up such an old thread, but I recently updated from a Feb >> 2010 vintage minimals to current (first to 1/12/2012, then to today 1/17). >> I ran

Re: [NTG-context] Counters again

On 17 January 2012 18:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 17.01.2012 um 15:55 schrieb Felix Ingram: > >> >> I'm now trying to use counters that will tally some values. The value >> of these could be zero, which the wiki states will be the default >> value. The following shows that nothing is displ

Re: [NTG-context] Using non-math fonts for letters and numerals in formulas

On 14:00 Tue 17 Jan , Hans Hagen wrote: > you can make a virtual font ... see palatino-math.lfg etc for an example > definition > Thanks Hans! I looked into it, but it's not much helpful for me without API documentation. Where I can find it? _

Re: [NTG-context] Tikz module causes errors

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Felix Ingram wrote: > Adding the \def\active{13} statement to the sources seems to fix > things for the time being. All of my graphics appear to have shifted > to the right by leftmarginwidth but I can correct for that. I believe > that someone else had a similar i

Re: [NTG-context] Tikz module causes errors

Adding the \def\active{13} statement to the sources seems to fix things for the time being. All of my graphics appear to have shifted to the right by leftmarginwidth but I can correct for that. I believe that someone else had a similar issue (Daniel Edwards in a mail sent on 14 Jan 2012). Oh, and

Re: [NTG-context] Tikz module causes errors

2012/1/17 Christophe Jorssen > If they aren't yet in the official repo, I would be happy to add those > patches. Note that I'm not a ConTeXt user, so I won't be able to test > them carefully. > which ones? all those in mojca’s repo ? because getting them into mainl

Re: [NTG-context] Wrong placement parameter (Was: two problems with natural tables)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 18-1-2012 06:31, Vladimir Lomov wrote: > > According to Command reference on wiki, placetable doesn't have 'split' >> parameter, see >> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/**Reference/en/placefloat

Re: [NTG-context] Tikz module causes errors

Hello Mojca, thanks for the follow-up. 2012/1/17 Mojca Miklavec : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote: >> I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error: >> >> \usemodule[tikz] >> \starttext >> Hello World >> \stoptext >> >> >> The error is: >> >> system

[NTG-context] xmlverbatim api changes?

Did I miss in the recent past some changes in the xmlverbatim API? Exercising from the manual the macros \xmldisplayverbatim{#1}{.} and \xmlinlineverbatim{#1}{.} I get as an error: ! Undefined control sequence. \startxmlinlineverbatim ... \doinitializeverbatim l.4 ] \ctxlxml #1->\directlua \zerocou

Re: [NTG-context] another surprising change (line break in TOC)

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > > And this interlineskip is ignored in your solution, test the following > please: > > > \def\TOCstyleBF{\switchtobodyfont[9pt]\bf\setupinterlinespace[line={40pt}]} > > \definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3% > > {\hfill\kern-1em\it

Re: [NTG-context] xmlprocessfile failing

On 18-1-2012 09:30, Hans van der Meer wrote: I get an inexplicable error in \xmlprocessfile. It seems to occur after my data are processed; somewhere in the aftermath of that call, I guess. The error is in: ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.16 18:33 MKIV This version was ok: ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.09 10:08

Re: [NTG-context] Wrong placement parameter (Was: two problems with natural tables)

On 18-1-2012 06:31, Vladimir Lomov wrote: According to Command reference on wiki, placetable doesn't have 'split' parameter, see http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/placefloat Just remove 'split' and your example will be compiled. each \place command accepts the same keys, so split is

Re: [NTG-context] two problems with natural tables

On 18-1-2012 05:19, Brian Landy wrote: Hi, sorry to dredge up such an old thread, but I recently updated from a Feb 2010 vintage minimals to current (first to 1/12/2012, then to today 1/17). I ran into problems splitting a table within a splitfloat. I search the list archives and came up wit

Re: [NTG-context] another surprising change (line break in TOC)

On 18-1-2012 08:30, luigi scarso wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Steffen Wolfrumwrote: Am 17.01.2012 um 23:41 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: You should try to make your code more readable. \definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3% {\maxaligned\bgroup \rlap{\it#1}%

[NTG-context] xmlprocessfile failing

I get an inexplicable error in \xmlprocessfile. It seems to occur after my data are processed; somewhere in the aftermath of that call, I guess. The error is in: ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.16 18:33 MKIV This version was ok: ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.09 10:08 MKIV The error: ! Missing } inserted.

Re: [NTG-context] Questions on \definition

Am 18.01.2012 um 02:47 schrieb Kip Warner: > Ah, so \setupdescriptions inherits the default values of > \definedescription? WIth \definedescription you create a new command (e.g. \definition) and environment (e.g. \startdefinition … \stopdefinition). With \setupdescriptions you can afterwards