Hello,
I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into
a context document. The original reference to the cwebmac.tex file (the
plain
TeX macro) is commented out and replaced by \usemodule[cweb]. The cweb
macros appear to expand something into \*11ptmmmt* which seems to ha
Hi,
> I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into
> a context document.
I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in
your TeX run. That is a "normal" TeX feature. They can usually be
avoided. But in your case I guess that it is something which
Patrick Grundlach wrote:
I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into
a context document.
I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in
your TeX run. That is a "normal" TeX feature. They can usually be
avoided. But in your case I guess that it is
At 21:45 13/10/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
I promised link to creators for ConTeXt ;)
http://www.im.ps.pl/context/?en
(and http://www.im.ps.pl/context/ for polish users)
But - please note - there is early pre-beta version ;)
I will work to increase functionality and performance of this. It
works in IE6 (
At 10:54 14/10/2003, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hi,
> I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into
> a context document.
I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in
your TeX run. That is a "normal" TeX feature. They can usually be
avoided. But in you
Hans Hagen wrote:
it may be a result of many unbreakable (key)words, so in that case try:
\setuptolerance[verytolerant,stretch]
Hans
It seems to be caused by the fact that \hbox is used frequently in
m-cweb.tex.
\hbox-es are unbreakable aren't they? Anyway your solution results in plenty
of un
Hi,
At 21:45 13.10.2003, Martin wrote:
Hi,
I promised link to creators for ConTeXt ;)
http://www.im.ps.pl/context/?en
(and http://www.im.ps.pl/context/ for polish users)
But - please note - there is early pre-beta version ;)
I will work to increase functionality and performance of this. It
works
At 22:59 13/10/2003, you wrote:
I installed the latest version of TeXLive 2003 (the so-called demo
version) and did the fmtutil and texhash bit. When I ran a job for a
customer, texexec hung up at the point where a graphic was being
loaded. So I went back to last year's texlive in a terrible hurry
At 22:50 12/10/2003, Ed L Cashin wrote:
Alexander Klink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to typeset a text which should look roughly like that:
>
> |-| |-| |--|
> |text | |text | |text |
> | | |-| | |
> |-| | |
> |-| |
At 11:59 12/10/2003, you wrote:
Hi,
> I should describe it more precisely. I use installations (2 at the moment)
> based on TL distributions.
With the supplied ConTeXt versions?
> Anyway, I'm aware, that
> ConTeXt is developing quite fast and I probably shouldn't expect,
> that 2002.524 and 2003.
At 13:23 11/10/2003, you wrote:
\startembarrassment
I found out what caused the strange behavior. I was testing the font in a
directory where there was also an old instance of the .tfm-file. So
Context would search the working directory, find everything it needed to
produce the font, and thus ne
At 08:26 12/10/2003, you wrote:
2003.10.5 versions gives the same output. Could you give me a recipe to spy
changes? I'm sure they are documented, but don't know how to get them.
most changes concern (yet) undocumented features, bug fixes, extensions
discussed on this list (user requests) ; drast
At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
Lets consider the following code:
\setupitemize[4,packed]
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
\stoptext
The problem is that in newer installation, default itemize style (meaning
packed, with triangle symbol) IS FORCED instead
Hi,
> (btw, do you use the xml alternative of the command reference?)
(why "alternative"? ;-))
This is a very good question! I'd like to know, too :)
We could establish a cont-??.xml working group. Or a technical
committee.
Patrick
--
You are your own rainbow!
__
Ahoi!
There's now a ConTeXt distribution of Bitstream Vera freeware font at
my site:
http://www.ramm.ch/fiee/texnique/?menu=0-1-4&lang=en
(Source of the font is gnome.org, redistribution is allowed, so I
packed it.)
Vera is similar to Verdana and Lucida; it contains Sans (4), Serif (2)
and Mo
> Why do you whish to reinstall all the supplied fonts? Or do you just
> want to learn how to use texfont?
I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable
to because of this bug. The normal context fonts do not exist on Gerben's
version. Before Gerben's reorganisation the
Nigel King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable
> to because of this bug.
Nigel,
did you try
\usetypescriptfile[adobekb]
\setupencoding [default=8r]
\usetypescript[adobekb][\defaultencoding]
\usetypescript[palatino][\default
>> I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable
>> to because of this bug.
>
> Nigel,
>
> did you try
>
> \usetypescriptfile[adobekb]
> \setupencoding [default=8r]
> \usetypescript[adobekb][\defaultencoding]
> \usetypescript[palatino][\defaultencoding]
> \setupbody
Hi,
> Yes this is the only thing I can do currently, but I thought I had more
> control previously.
what kind of control do you miss?
>> What are normal ConTeXt fonts?
> Say ec-urw-times and the typescripts etc.
OK. But adobekb is only the last chain in the typescipt series. So if
you can poin
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, John Culleton wrote:
> I installed the latest version of TeXLive 2003 (the so-called demo
> version) and did the fmtutil and texhash bit. When I ran a job for a
> customer, texexec hung up at the point where a graphic was being
> loaded. So I went back to last year's texlive
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Nigel King wrote:
> > Why do you whish to reinstall all the supplied fonts? Or do you just
> > want to learn how to use texfont?
> I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable
> to because of this bug. The normal context fonts do not exist on Gerb
Problem: a (very) different ConTeXt versions and a different output
From: "Hans Hagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 PM
> At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote:
>
> >Lets consider the following code:
> >
> >\setupitemize[4,packed]
> >\starttext
> >\sta
22 matches
Mail list logo
