\starttypescript [sans][dingbats][name]
\definefontsynonym [Sans][file:d05l]
\stoptypescript
\definetypeface [dingbats][ss][sans][dingbats][default]
\starttext
{\getnamedglyphdirect{dingbats}{0x272a}}
Or here's the character directly: ✪
\stoptext
Anyone else running Ubuntu who can confirm
Hi,
On 03/22/2011 05:08 PM, mathew wrote:
{\getnamedglyphdirect{dingbats}{0x272a}}
this won't do anything unless the glyph's *name* in the font is
actually 0x272a, which is unlikely (in my version of the ghostscript
font, the name of ✪ is a37).
Or here's the character directly: ✪
This
On 18-3-2011 4:27, Khaled Hosny wrote:
But it might not be a bad idea for LuaTeX to automatically perform a
pfm2afm conversion and cache the converted files when necessary, and
probably not that hard to code. On the other hand, Type 1 fonts are
legacy at this point, so it might not be worth it.
On 18.03.2011 03:42, mathew wrote:
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:53, Stefan Müller wrote:
Yes, I thought so. I just asked, because I couldn't find an environment variable with that name. Even after
setuptex.bat typing echo %OSFONTDIR% did only print %OSFONTDIR% and not a
list of paths, as I
On 18-3-2011 12:26, Stefan Müller wrote:
I have the following:
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ *.mf
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ type1 \ *.pfb
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ type1 \ afm \ *.afm
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ type1 \ map \ *.map
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ type1 \ pfm \ *.pfm
just
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:04, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Also, I only consider a type 1 font okay when it has both an afm and a pfb
file and mkiv can handle that quite well (even beyond the regular tex
encodings). Personally I need it for fonts that I have bought and don't want
to buy
Indeed, that works! Thank you very much. So again, structure matters.
Kind regards,
Stefan.
On 18.03.2011 12:39, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 18-3-2011 12:26, Stefan Müller wrote:
I have the following:
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ *.mf
texmf-fonts \ fonts \ rsfs \ type1 \ *.pfb
texmf-fonts \ fonts \
On 18-3-2011 3:40, mathew wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:04, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Also, I only consider a type 1 font okay when it has both an afm and a pfb
file and mkiv can handle that quite well (even beyond the regular tex
encodings). Personally I need it for fonts that I have
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:51, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 18-3-2011 3:40, mathew wrote:
\definetypeface [dingbats][ss][sans][dingbats][default]
this assumes a dingbats typescript
Sorry, I omitted that when copying my code...
\starttext
{\dingbats
On 18-3-2011 5:01, mathew wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:51, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 18-3-2011 3:40, mathew wrote:
\definetypeface [dingbats][ss][sans][dingbats][default]
this assumes a dingbats typescript
Sorry, I omitted that when copying my code...
\starttext
{\dingbats
Hi mathew,
thanks for your reply!
On 16.03.2011 16:58, mathew wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:00, Stefan Müllerwarrence@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
I put the rsfs directory with its subdirs from the .zip to the folder
c:\context\tex\texmf-fonts\fonts\data\ as Wolfgang suggested [4] and ran
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:05:17 +0100 schrieb Stefan Müller:
Is this a typo and do you mean .pfm file? Otherwise I don't get it.
Should I just copy the .pfb files to C:\Windows\Fonts, too?
You need both pfm and pfb in the fonts folder. But windows probably
pulled the pfb along with the pfm when
Ah, thanks for that. Indeed, there are .pfm and .pfb files in the Fonts
directory now. But still
mtxrun --script fonts --reload
doesn't seem to check for those file types...
Best regards,
Stefan.
On 17.03.2011 13:40, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:05:17 +0100 schrieb Stefan
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 04:05, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
I'm using Windows Vista 64bit and installed the rsfs font by right-clicking
the .pfm files. I thought I had to use the .pfb files, but Windows did not
recognize those and didn't show Install in the context menu. After
Hi Stefan,
It seems that somehow on your system the rsfs font is not seen by mkiv.
In fact after the following command
mtxrun --script fonts --reload
you should say
mtxrun --script fonts --list --pattern=rsfs
in order to see whether any rsfs font is detected by mkiv.
If the
On 17.03.2011 16:04, mathew wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 04:05, Stefan Müllerwarrence@gmx.de wrote:
I'm using Windows Vista 64bit and installed the rsfs font by right-clicking
the .pfm files. I thought I had to use the .pfb files, but Windows did not
recognize those and didn't show
So... I think I got somewhere now with the explanations from you and mathew.
It seems that the problem were the missing .afm files (as mtxrun wanted
those, not .pfm nor .pfb). I found two different solutions A and B:
(1) Install fonts (.pfm) in Windows
(2A) Put .afm files to C:\Windows\Fonts
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:53, Stefan Müller wrote:
Yes, I thought so. I just asked, because I couldn't find an environment
variable with that name. Even after setuptex.bat typing echo %OSFONTDIR%
did only print %OSFONTDIR% and not a list of paths, as I expected.
There are defaults baked into
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:42:38PM -0500, mathew wrote:
- If the .pfm and .pfb files are sufficient for Windows, why does
mtxrun specifically search for .afm files and not also for .pfm?
Probably because mtxrun (and the rest of ConTeXt and LuaTeX) are
written for Unix and ported to
Hi,
like others before, I tried to get the script alphabet from Ralph
Smith's Formal Font to work in MkIV (minimals) and failed. There seems
to be only outdated or unclear and unspecific information about where to
start with fonts available. Or: there is information everywhere but I
can't
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:00, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote:
like others before, I tried to get the script alphabet from Ralph Smith's
Formal Font to work in MkIV (minimals) and failed. There seems to be only
outdated or unclear and unspecific information about where to start with
21 matches
Mail list logo
