On 8/21/2018 4:46 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Are the x and y values in pts (post script points or big points?)
measured from the top-left corner?
afaik bottom up base points
the script will look into the synctex file and figure out where to go
to. Basically all the viewer needs to do is
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/21/2018 3:04 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Hans Hagen wrote:
Anyway, a better support for "pick-in-PDF-and-go-to-source" (synctex),
namely when user "tunes" the docs to their final stage, would be great.
I think that the current
On 8/21/2018 3:04 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Hans Hagen wrote:
Anyway, a better support for "pick-in-PDF-and-go-to-source"
(synctex), namely when user "tunes" the docs to their final stage,
would be great.
I think that the current approach to hard code synctex libraries
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Hans Hagen wrote:
Anyway, a better support for "pick-in-PDF-and-go-to-source" (synctex),
namely when user "tunes" the docs to their final stage, would be great.
I think that the current approach to hard code synctex libraries into a
viewer is a limitation (instead an
On 8/21/2018 10:00 AM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote:
When building a document (or more precisely: documentation which
consists of many documents), I'm widely referring to other files via
\input, \component etc., I'm widely using \defs, \defines and \buffers
defined in separate files (as these
Hello,
a bit later - I was thinking if to react here, after reading all about synctex
and complicated support for complicatedly assembled source files - but my
personal experience/wish...
On 7/24/2018 11:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Hi Hans, all,
One needed feature
Am 2018-07-25 um 19:50 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>> In any case, I would very much appreciate another “frozen” release like MK
>> II that one can use for documents that need to be retypeset over years
>> (like my lecture notes that need an update every few years).
>
> When we have luatex 1.10 that
On 7/25/2018 3:12 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote:
I have an entirely different suggestion, possibly fitting the description of a
possible “lean” version.
One important feature of TeX has been the longevity of the documents. This is
of course of little interest to those of us who
typeset a
On 7/25/2018 6:18 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:50:58 -0400
Rik Kabel wrote:
On 7/25/2018 04:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2018-07-25 um 03:29 schrieb Rik Kabel
:
I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to
the XML export. A good example is that of
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:50:58 -0400
Rik Kabel wrote:
> On 7/25/2018 04:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> > Am 2018-07-25 um 03:29 schrieb Rik Kabel
> > :
> >> I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to
> >> the XML export. A good example is that of bibliographies, where
>
On 7/25/2018 3:50 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 7/25/2018 04:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2018-07-25 um 03:29 schrieb Rik Kabel :
I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to the
XML export. A good example is that of bibliographies, where font
styles carry significant
On 7/25/2018 04:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 2018-07-25 um 03:29 schrieb Rik Kabel :
I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to the XML
export. A good example is that of bibliographies, where font styles carry
significant semantic meaning (depending on the
I have an entirely different suggestion, possibly fitting the description of a
possible “lean” version.
One important feature of TeX has been the longevity of the documents. This is
of course of little interest to those of us who
typeset a book/journal for publishing and care little about it
On 7/25/2018 12:03 PM, Richard Mahoney | Indica et Buddhica wrote:
Agree wholeheartedly, and possibly also support for Tibetan.
define support ... what is needed
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On 7/25/2018 9:45 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
On 24. Jul 2018, at 20:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
[…]
That said, a logical question is how about next versions of context. Are there
fundamental features missing? Is more needed? […]
At the risk of sounding like a scratched, repeating gramophone
On 7/25/2018 3:29 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 7/24/2018 14:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to the
XML export. A good example is that of bibliographies, where font styles
carry significant semantic meaning (depending on the standard used:
-
From: Robert Zydenbos
Reply-to: mailing list for ConTeXt users
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] future versions
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:45:47 +0200
Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
On 24. Jul 2018, at 20:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> […]
> That sai
Am 2018-07-25 um 03:29 schrieb Rik Kabel :
> I would ask for more stylistic or semantic tagging to be added to the XML
> export. A good example is that of bibliographies, where font styles carry
> significant semantic meaning (depending on the standard used: italic for book
> titles, ibold or
On 24. Jul 2018, at 20:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> […]
> That said, a logical question is how about next versions of context. Are
> there fundamental features missing? Is more needed? […]
At the risk of sounding like a scratched, repeating gramophone record --
support for Indic scripts
On 7/24/2018 14:43, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
Around the upcoming context meeting we expect to release luatex 1.09
(or 1.10 ... yet undecided) which is the prelude to the next year tex
live version. It's another step towards a stable version in terms of
functionality as we don't expect much more
On 7/24/2018 11:02 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Hi Hans, all,
One needed feature that would be of general use is better support for
synctex. Thinking especially of structural elements such as headings,
footnotes, etc. which mostly do not work with synctex - i.e., clicking
Hi Hans, all,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:43:51 -0600, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
Around the upcoming context meeting we expect to release luatex 1.09 (or
1.10 ... yet undecided) which is the prelude to the next year tex live
version. It's another step towards a stable version in terms of
On 07/24/2018 09:07 PM, Hans van der Meer wrote:
> I am using XML a lot for structured data and typesetting them with
> hopefully not too much attention to detail — although I must confess
> often being a hopeless perfectionist.
But is it possible to use ConTeXt without paying attention to the
On 07/24/2018 08:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> [...]
> It's not my intention to implement each possible feature as core feature
> (no one would document it anyway). Also, as development is basically a
> spare time effort, don't expect complex commercially interesting niches
> to come for free
I am using XML a lot for structured data and typesetting them with hopefully
not too much attention to detail — although I must confess often being a
hopeless perfectionist.
If there are general improvements that can be made in that direction, I would
welcome them. Although I apologise not
Hi,
Around the upcoming context meeting we expect to release luatex 1.09 (or
1.10 ... yet undecided) which is the prelude to the next year tex live
version. It's another step towards a stable version in terms of
functionality as we don't expect much more to be added (in fact, I'm
wondering
26 matches
Mail list logo
