My expectation is that they will be serviced with the same service pack.
2008 R2 is a totally new OS - Windows 6.1.
2003 R2 was just a bunch of add-on features tacked on to 2003 - same OS.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: David
Windows 2008 shipped with SP1 slipstreamed. You couldn't get a SP0 Windows 2008
install. SP2 was a unified package -
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=a4dd31d5-f907-4406-9012-a5c3199ea2b3displaylang=en
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
That basically boils down to two paragraphs - security and reliability. Write a
paragraph about each and explain how your organization will benefit.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
The dcpromo bits are slightly different and will check the schema version
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2003 Server R2
Unless MS
Build the DC from scratch.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: P2V on a DC
I'm wanting to add a third DC, probably a virtual server
, that's something I would expect a Senior resource to be
able to do no problem.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Sr. Systems Engineer
If I come
Just make sure the computer account is a member of the RAS/IAS servers security
group. I think if you right click the root node in the IAS console there is a
Register option that will do this for you.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Get something like LiveMeeting or WebEx. I know LiveMeeting does video fine - I
assume WebEx does too. Adobe Connect is another one.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December
800-936-4900. Tell the call router you want to speak to the next available
engineer in the queue.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:09 AM
To: NT System Admin
Did you properly define the case severity with the call router?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 1:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft
only.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft Support: Number??
Yes just called back and case was re-assigned
Yes - Subnets, Sites, Site link, Drag/drop in that order.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Paul Everett [mailto:evere...@leementalhealth.org]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: simple
Means the password was never set
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Clayton Doige [mailto:clayton.do...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 5:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT question about oldcmp.exe
Do you have a specific question? I've used it a bunch and as an end user I find
it be a fantastic experience/tool. I've played with it a little on the backend
and it's certainly complicated.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From
and likely at the
top of Sysvol as well too.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 3:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Delegating GPO administration
I read
It changes because of the new crypto types IIRC and needing to have a hash in
that new format.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Does anyone know if there is a way to extend the 90 (or 120 or whatever) day
grace period on an app mode TS box before you need to plug-in CAL tokens? It's
a WS08 machine.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
~ Finally, powerful
. The callback
SLA is based on severity and time of day. If you're a premier customer they
connect you in to the queue.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:12 AM
To: NT System Admin
No repl would happen if I understand the scenario right
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: AD
Have you collected a network trace of the DHCP exchange on a client when it
fails? I would start there.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Eisenberg, Wayne [mailto:wayne.eisenb...@pbvllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:20 PM
I don't understand what it is you're trying to achieve. You mention psexec and
then you also talk about a screen like a terminal server.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:d...@parkviewmc.com]
Sent: Tuesday
One (IMO major) upside to a name brand option is that finding expertise that
knows how to manage it properly, troubleshoot, etc is going to be FAR easier
than the no name brands.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: John Aldrich
That's incorrect.
The computer initiates the change. Thus if the computer is offline the change
never happens.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:34
Delegate the colo people access to their part of antivirus? It seems like a
waste of money/resources/etc to run a parallel infrastructure.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday
I've never had much luck with the UI. The PowerShell syntax is intuitive though:
Get-MessageTrackingLog -Server YourHubTransportServer -Sender
f...@domain.commailto:f...@domain.com -Recipients
david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org -Start 01/21/10
Tweak as appropriate
Thanks,
Brian
What you're trying to accomplish and the switches you're using would be a
useful start...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Haralson, Joe (GE Comm Fin, non-GE) [mailto:joe.haral...@ge.com]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 8:18 PM
Why? You might as well just buy a new PBX or upgrade the existing one and run
it on the existing infrastructure if you're going to do that. Doesn't get you
any cost savings...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff
for it to crash. I'll need the whole CRASH_MODE* folder under
c:\debuggers. It zips well. Email me offline when you have it.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
That was deprecated post Exchange 2003 FYI
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: N00b question
Go into ADUC, Exchange Tasks, and select
of workflow based
forms on top of SharePoint with that particular in-box template.
Depending on the version of SharePoint you have there are some actual workflow
options.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Gary Babb [mailto:gsb
So create a contact for yourself called IT Garage Clients and put that on the
TO line, then BCC the DL.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: N00b
What I do is set the default for the “admin” command prompt to be red
background/white text so it’s always obvious which one I’m using. Windows will
remember this for you across sessions.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: asbz...@gmail.com [mailto:asbz
The particular issue Bob noted is one of those obscure things that's unlikely
to affect most people so I wouldn't generally worry about it much just FYI...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Palmer, Neal [mailto:npal...@uwic.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, January 25
I'd just use a Group Policy and Restricted Groups. If you need more flexibility
the groups options in Group Policy Preferences may work. I usually stay away
from modifying the two default policies but there's no technical reason you
can't.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c
If you have WINS you're going to need to pick one domain or the other to
register in WINS while they're both still up at the same time.
Is there any particular reason the new domain needs the same name as the legacy
domain? I'd avoid it just to avoid the potential trouble.
Thanks,
Brian
Academic or Addtl Information Worker sounds least likely to get a bunch of
phone calls from their telemarketer people that always hound you after you
register for these things
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
Also you can enable tracing for the drive mapping part of the CSE and get some
debug spew which may help with troubleshooting.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:05 AM
To: NT System
Yeah exactly
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Free, Bob [mailto:r...@pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: GPO preferences not reliable on XP?
Not speaking for Brian but reading between the lines I think he
No you do not assuming it will be Exchange 2003 as well.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: a little gun shy (also sent to the Exchange list
That solution doesn't handle nested groups which may be a deal breaker
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mapping a drive, dependant on Group
from the GAL
and nested in the effect DL. You also still need groups with screwy ACLs to
really pull this off.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Yes you can see the membership because the checkbox does some funny business to
keep that specifically working.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 8:16 AM
Do you have an old ADC config in AD? I haven't worked on this stuff in a long
time but you may need to clean that up.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:00
My only complaint about them is they've gotten really big and I think it's
impacted their customer service. I use Server Intellect (have for many years
now post 1and1) and they have been fantastic.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From
Dell just rebrands Avocent IIRC. I've used the Dell flagged ones in a bunch of
customer sites and they're fine. You can put them on the LAN and have remote
access via a Java client. They have various SIP modules too I think for
different stuff.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
Not free, but perhaps look at a Windows Home Server?
They will back your data up with an agent on each of your machines and you can
boot from a CD they provide and restore your machine point-in-time from a
backup like an image if it goes bad.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c
Something I do sometimes is just say Talk to me about X. Pick a feature and
explain it where X being some skill/concept/technology/etc that either their
resume claims their strong in or the position is for and see how that goes.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br
They should really all be using secure SMTP given the passwords are all
cleartext otherwise.
Why not buy a real cert? They're like 20 bucks on GoDaddy once you've clicked
through beer, wings, strippers, race cars, etc.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
The ISP isn't using a valid cert?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: How to permanently accept
Not 100% true as raising the forest functional level traditionally added
attributes to the partial attribute set which is technically a schema change.
Whether or not this will still happen when you go to 2008 FFL depends on what
FFL you're at now.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
Sort of. I've seen this cause issues in large (and messy) customer environments
before.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:01 PM
To: NT System
Typically you would use sites in AD to do this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: dc replication
I would enable change notification on the site link given this scenario so you
don't get the 15 minute replication delay.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, February
Basically it just makes the site link act like an intra-site connection so not
really any overhead on a connection like this.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday
that big of a deal but you need to keep it in mind.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Active Directory, 4th Ed - http://www.briandesmond.com/ad4/
Microsoft MVP - https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Brian
From: Ken Schaefer
Up until Windows 2008, there was a Group Policy tab on the properties of OUs,
Domains, and Sites in ADUC and dssites. This was how you accessed policies and
edited them. GPMC came out of band sometime after 2003 shipped.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
Active
What's the concern about activesync?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 9:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: iPhone and Exch 2007?
Followup: I
Yes that is an issue. You can control this by preventing these devices from
sync'ing though (Allow Non-Provisionable Devices checkbox). In Exchange 2010
you can filter and quarantine specific types of devices with the new device
access rules.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c
It would be a delete and a create. Pre 2008 these audits aren't really helpful
much.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:04 PM
To: NT System
You just need to check the Allow Unprovisionable Devices checkbox on the Mobile
Settings node.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 10:08 AM
To: NT System
I don't have an Exchange 2003 org handy but there's a Global Settings type node
in the top of the tree in ESM and then under there is a Mobile Options type
thing. Said Mobile stuff showed up in 2003 SP2 so if you're missing that (hope
not) you won't see it.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
The converse to the DHCP detection stuff is that if any Windows box comes up in
the domain with DHCP installed, DHCP won't actually start until someone with
(by default) Enterprise Admin privs authorizes it.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original
Yep. Do your switches support DHCP Snooping? You can pretty much kill the
problem if they have such a feature.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 5:11 PM
Most folks use a third party archiving solution for this. There's a myriad of
them which have wide ranging impact on your checkbook.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, February
That is a weird looking query. What are you trying to get out of it?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: LDAP
suggested. You can use the incldn and excldn switches
if you wanted and search the whole domain but only include certain OUs
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Robert Smith [mailto:exch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6
# for hex 0x8004230f / decimal -2147212529 :
VSS_E_UNEXPECTED_PROVIDER_ERROR vss.h
# 1 matches found for 0x8004230f
What else is installed on the box?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: DAVID SMITH
Sounds like a binding order issue to me. Make sure you don't have DNS or WINS
configured on the iSCSI NIC and that it's not configured to register in DNS
also.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: N Parr [mailto:npar...@mortonind.com
The trick to this is to connect to the print server from a 32 bit client (so
goto \\serverfile:///\\server and browse the printers folder), and add the
drivers that way.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: N Parr [mailto:npar
I do all of those (except for backups) in some degree or another.
With temperature, unless you have actual probes, the server agents will report
on that.
With backups you'd need to rely on events on either the backup system or the
client if they're logged.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
The actual system runs on *nix but the agents (various ones) are available for
windows. It's quite easy to manage once you have it on the *nix box - just a
pile of text files.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Ziots, Edward
Set the smarthost on the existing SMTP server to be IronPort, set the smarthost
on IronPort to be the ISP.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David W. McSpadden [mailto:dav...@imcu.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 2:05 PM
To: NT
I'm pretty sure one of my customers does. What's the issue?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 4:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Nagios fans(Win2K8
The servers I have access to use the NRPE agent and it's just in c:\nagios. Is
this some addon to that? I need an idea of what specifically I'm looking for.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org
Why not just dcpromo the box down, rename it, and dcpromo back up?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Burian, Matthew J. (mjb) [mailto:m...@burianit.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server
You can also integrate the certs pretty easily with anything that uses IIS or
ISA/TMG/UAG for app auth.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:59 PM
To: NT System
DA does not require 2008R2 DCs...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 5:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win7 Pro vs. Enterprise
OK - I've been
I haven't gone and looked but it probably just has a simple SKU check in it.
You can basically unlock higher SKUs of Windows without a reinstall so
everything has to be there for that to work.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From
It should be able to kick out more info to a text file.
The scenario you mention of branch DCs not having connectivity is completely
normal.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent
What version of Windows is this running on?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS Server service shuts
OK so I'm still unclear as to whether the service is crashing or it's never
entering a running state or what?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 2:00 PM
OK well I'm not about to try and help you if you're going to deflect the
questions. Good luck.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:20 PM
To: NT System Admin
No you can background load AD zones in WS08 plus
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:20 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: DNS Server service
I've done it a couple times - was straight forward enough.
Just keep in mind you need to be consistent and use Vista RSAT+ tools moving
forward.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod
.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DNS Server service shuts down shortly after the DC boots
I just set this up
No you only need one RAID controller, however, you're going at this backwards
IMO. Have you run your numbers through the Exchange storage calculator and
looked at the recommended disk config?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Glen
Further reading suggests a single server could maintain multiple copies of
the Exchange database on a single server's JBODs, but that's got to be more
overhead than just RAID 1'ing it.
No, that LCR functionality was pulled. 1 DB copy per server max.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br
JBOD with 3 copies is not the recommended approach
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Disk configuration
Option B is correct. :)
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Disk configuration in new server
At least one
RAID5 for the DB may be just fine. Run the numbers through the Exchange storage
calculator.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:55 PM
To: NT System
Well the ADM files will all re-profilerate back in to your sysvol for one.
IIRC the legacy tools will fall back to local ADMs if they can’t find any on
sysvol but don’t quote me on that.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c – 312.731.3132
From
With something that small you're unlikely to max out I/O on whatever you
choose...
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin
What do you have now and what does utilization look like on it?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Palmer, Neal [mailto:npal...@uwic.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2008 HW
There is an Exchange 2010 calculator -
http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2010/01/22/453859.aspx. The i/o model in 2010
is completely different from 2007 so the data from the 2007 calculator would
not provide valid inputs.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br
DigiCert is awesome and who I send all my customers to.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Matthew W. Ross [mailto:mr...@ephrataschools.org]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SSL Certs
Given that error I would dcpromo the box down and re-promote it. Also figure
out what's wrong with the i/o subsystem.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010
IIRC CertificatesForExchange is just reselling GoDaddy
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: SSL Certs... who do you
I'll go with yes too. ;)
-ilike is the other operator I'd look at
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE
The Select-Object cmdlet is probably what you want. It has -First, -Last,
-Skip, -Index, etc which you can use to step in to an array
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent
and TechEd China's. Look at the admission
ticket price on those versus say TechEd Australia.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Live Launch
101 - 200 of 1370 matches
Mail list logo