Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-03-01 Thread Aurélyen Daudet
Thanks for your humor Frank ; ) I'm agree, mailing lists were (are) really fine and were (are ) properly working. In my opinion the change to the forum is a pure marketing thing. Go to the website, be polluted by adverts and announcements, watch the community Gallery... etc. Instead of clear and

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-29 Thread Frank Rueter|OHUfx
<mailto:mrhowardjo...@yahoo.com> *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:36 PM *To:* Nuke user discussion <mailto:nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal Personally I don't mind the dumb questions. I've done enoug

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-29 Thread Deke Kincaid
gt; > *Sent:* Thursday, February 25, 2016 2:36 PM > *To:* Nuke user discussion <nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk> > *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal > > Personally I don't mind the dumb questions. I've done enough of them > myself but also I have no

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-29 Thread Nathan Rusch
-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal Personally I don't mind the dumb questions. I've done enough of them myself but also I have noticed that this also helps develop a new generation (I'm getting old) of users who have the confidence to answer these questions. I'm for this as it is a way to spread

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-25 Thread Howard Jones
Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:14 PM > To: nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk > Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal > > I love StackExchange and it's self monitored nature and set of rules ensure > high quality questions and answers, and an easy way to f

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-25 Thread Nathan Rusch
like that happening. -Nathan From: Frank Rueter|OHUfx Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:14 PM To: nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal I love StackExchange and it's self monitored nature and set of rules ensure high quality questions

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-24 Thread Carlos Trijueque
I agree with what Frank says. In any case, there is already a VFX StackExchange-like thing going on: www.vfxoverflow.com and even a subbreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/nukevfx I would post this annoucement there too, to reach a wider user base. Thanks Aaron. ./charlie On Thu, Feb 25, 2016

Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-24 Thread Frank Rueter|OHUfx
I love StackExchange and it's self monitored nature and set of rules ensure high quality questions and answers, and an easy way to find the answer to a question that has already been posed. People that are too lazy to do their own homework/research and expect spoon feeding from others instead

[Nuke-users] Nuke Stack Exchange Proposal

2016-02-24 Thread aaron barclay
Hey Nuke list, There is an effort going on to get a Stack Exchange site off the ground for Nuke. If you are familiar with Stack Exchange you might agree it is a pretty good fit for a home of technical questions (and answers) and could be a great resource for nuke in the future to complement those