I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of
SciPy 0.8.0. Please try it out and report any problems on the scipy-dev
mailing list.
SciPy is a package of tools for science and engineering for Python.
It includes modules for statistics, optimization, integration, linear
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> One odd error (the directory was empty upon inspection) and one failure.
> Alan Isaac
>
The failure is yet another case of test precision set slightly too high.
Thought we had got them all... Not sure about the matlab thing. Which
version of
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Peter <
numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> > On 7/9/2010 7:11 AM, Peter wrote:
> >> I was going to ask if someone could build Windows installers for
> >> NumPy 1.4.1 on Python 2.7 (to facilita
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Based on patches contributed by Christoph Gohlke, I've created a branch
>> for 1.5.x:
>>
>>http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/branches/1.5.x
>>
>> It sh
Scipy Trac seems to work very well now, I get notification emails for
comments on tickets etc. For numpy Trac, nothing right now. Can this be
fixed?
Thanks,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/l
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>
>
> On 7/18/2010 2:20 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Peter
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:02 PM, cool-RR wrote:
>>>
Hello.
I'd appreciate if the NumPy team could provide an MSI i
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>> Scipy Trac seems to work very well now, I get notification emails for
>> comments on tickets etc. For numpy Trac, nothing right now. Can this be
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:46 AM, celil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed numpy on Snow Leopard using pip. However, running the
> tests results in a segmentation fault. Has anybody else encountered this
> problem? How did you solve it?
>
> Do not use pip or easy_install, these tools are not ve
Hi all,
There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
doc/swig etc. to be included in the released binaries. This thread,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/26913/focus=26917,
seems to indicate the docs should still be integrated in the main
documentat
Hi all,
For numpy 1.5.0 no one has yet said they have urgent changes that need to go
in. If you do, please reply with the what and why. If nothing big has to go
in, I propose the following release schedule:
Aug 1 : beta 1
Aug 15: rc 1
Aug 22: rc 2
Aug 29: release
Please note that the branch has
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:16 PM, David wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 05:44 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:57:36 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> >> I have finally prepared and uploaded a test repository containing numpy
> >> code:
> >>
> >> http://github.com/numpy/numpy_svn
>
Hmm, th
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:58:11 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> >> For numpy 1.5.0 no one has yet said they have urgent changes that need
> >> to go in. If yo
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>
>> Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:58:11 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> > For numpy 1.5.0 no one has yet said they have urgent changes that need
>> > to go in. If
I'm pleased to announce the release of SciPy 0.8.0.
SciPy is a package of tools for science and engineering for Python. It
includes modules for statistics, optimization, integration, linear algebra,
Fourier transforms, signal and image processing, ODE solvers, and more. This
release comes one and
Hi,
The execfile builtin has disappeared in python 3.x, so I'm trying to find
another solution for the use of it in setupegg.py. So far I've tried
if sys.version_info[0] >= 3:
# 3.x doesn't have execfile anymore, so we define our own
# The code below is syntactically valid 2.x, but 2.x th
Hi David,
Commit r8541 broke building with numscons for me, does this fix look okay:
http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commit/1c88007ab00cf378ebe19fbe54e9e868212c73d1
I am puzzled though why my endian.h is not picked up in the build - I have a
good collection of those on my system, at least in all
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
> > doc/swig etc. to be included in the released binaries. This thread,
> > ht
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 13:22, Darren Dale wrote:
> > I just upgraded my svn checkout and did a fresh install. When I try to
> > run the test suite, I get a ton of errors:
> >
> >
> > np.test()
> > Running unit tests for numpy
> > NumPy versi
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Bill Spotz wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> > How about removing the swig html and pdf docs, and then including the
swig/pyrex/cython dirs as-is? In setup.py:
>
> Note that the html and pdf documents are crea
I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy 1.5.0.
This will be the first NumPy release to include support for Python 3, as
well as for Python 2.7. Please try this beta and report any problems on the
NumPy mailing list.
Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at
h
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On 8/1/2010 12:38 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/ <
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/>
>
> I'm
Hi,
I'm trying to get building to work with Python 3.1 under Wine on OS X. The
first thing you run into is a python distutils problem, which is fixed by
replacing line 379 of cygwinccompiler.py with
result = RE_VERSION.search(str(out_string))
The next thing I run into is a numpy.distutils is
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:48:52 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > I'm trying to get building to work with Python 3.1 under Wine on OS X.
> > The first thing you run into is a python distutils problem, which is
> > fixe
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:03 AM, sam tygier wrote:
> On 01/08/10 17:38, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy
> > 1.5.0. This will be the first NumPy release to include support for
> > Python 3, as well as for Python 2.7.
Hi all,
I'm looking at what needs to be deprecated/removed and have a few questions:
1. ma.core has some deprecations without version info:
make_mask: flag keyword
MaskedArray.flag
MaskedArray.raw_data
allclose: fillvalue keyword
Should these be removed, and if not can someone provide a
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:05 AM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
>
> On 2010-08-01, at 12:38 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy 1.5.0.
> This will be the first NumPy release to include support for Python 3, as
> well as for
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> Tests produce a few failures and a couple warnings.
> Details below.
> Alan Isaac
>
>
> Python 2.7 (r27:82525, Jul 4 2010, 09:01:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
> on win32
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more informati
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:09:00 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Alan G Isaac
> [clip]
> >> ===
Hi all,
Can I ask all of you to please check if there's anything you still have to
add to the release notes for 1.5.0 by this Sunday?
Also, what is the status of PEP 3118 compatibility? Can someone who knows
write a few sentences on that?
Thanks,
Ralf
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:24 AM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am an eager for numpy datetime support, but I have not heard about it
> recently. Last I heard it was taken out of 1.4 because of some compatibility
> issues. When will datetime be a full numpy feature?
>
> It will also not be i
==
ERROR: test_multiarray.TestIO.test_ascii
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"Z:\Users\rgommers\.wine\drive_c\Python31\lib\site-packages\nose-3.0.0.dev-
Hi,
I'd appreciate a review of these changes:
http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5
http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations
Thanks,
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailma
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>
>> Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> > There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython,
>> > doc/swig
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:19 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > The execfile builtin has disappeared in python 3.x, so I'm trying to
> > find another solution for the use of it in setupegg.py. So far I've
> > tried
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd appreciate a review of these changes:
>> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5
>>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> sorry for the delay
>
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 18:38, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the first beta of NumPy
> 1.5.0.
> > This will be the first NumPy release t
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Skipper Seabold wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> sorry for the delay
> >>
&
I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy 1.5.0.
This will be the first NumPy release to include support for Python 3, as
well as for Python 2.7.
Please try this beta and report any problems on the NumPy mailing list.
Especially with Python 3 testing will be very useful
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
> 1.5.0.
> > This will be the first NumPy release to include support for Python 3, as
&
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> I'm getting one unit test error on SunOS 5.8 UltraSPARC 5, with Sun
>> WorkShop 6 update 2 C 5.3 Patch 111679-14 2004/02/20:
>>
>>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:28 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy
> 1.5.0.
> > This will be the first NumPy release to include support for Python
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Southey
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Ralf Gommers
>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Bakker wrote:
> I understand why numpy does it, but even Python itself gives 10**-2 = 0.01.
> So I am wondering whether this is the intended behavior of numpy. I don't
> really think so, but I may be wrong.
>
> Was intended, but should probably be changed:
ht
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Installing into a local virtualenv (with either of the methods that work)
> > looks good. Into /Library/Frameworks/..., nose refuses to run any tests,
> due
&
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've gone ahead and implemented the Laguerre and Hermite (H and He)
> polynomials, but at this point I'm loath to add them to numpy as the
> polynomial space is
I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of
NumPy 1.5.0. This will be the first NumPy release to include support for
Python 3, as well as for Python 2.7.
Please try this RC and report any problems on the NumPy mailing list.
Especially with Python 3 testing will be v
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:58 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> 2010/8/25 Stéfan van der Walt :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Without this patch, numpy.distutils is broken on, amongs others,
> > Ubuntu. This prohibits packages such as Enthought's Enable from being
> > built successfully.
> >
> > Would anyone ob
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Kevin Jacobs <
bioinfor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
>> of NumPy 1.5.0. This will be the first NumPy releas
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Travis Oliphant > > wrote:
>>
>>&
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:32 AM, David Huard wrote:
> Nils and Joseph,
>
> Thanks for the bug report, this is now fixed in SVN (r8672).
>
> Ralph. is this something that you want to see backported in 1.5 ?
>
>From the other replies to your mail I gather your bug fix is still going to
change. If
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Huard wrote:
>
> I just added a warning alerting concerned users (r8674), so this takes care
> of the bug fix and Nils wish to avoid a silent change in behavior. These two
> changes could be included in 1.5 if Ralf feels this is worthwhile.
>
> That looks li
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, David Huard wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Huard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I just added a warning alerting concerned user
I am pleased to announce the availability of NumPy 1.5.0. This is the first
NumPy release to include support for Python 3, as well as for Python 2.7.
Binaries, sources, documentation and release notes can be found at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/.
Thank you to everyone who contrib
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, John Salvatier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to update my numpydoc so it works with sphinx 1.0, but I am
> not sure where the dev version is; can someone point me in the right
> direction?
>
> In numpy trunk, under doc/sphinxext/. That works *only* with sphinx 1
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Peter <
numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> NumPy currently makes extensive use of the DeprecationWarning
> class to alert users when some feature is going to be withdrawn.
> However, as of Python 2.7, the DeprecationWarning is silent by
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Peter <
>> numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi a
Hi,
There have been many reports from OS X 10.5(.8) users that the provided
binaries on Sourceforge for numpy versions >= 1.4.0 do not work, see
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1322. If you're an OS X 10.5 user I
would like your help to test if the same issue occurs for the following
binary
hough, there you would use len(a) instead of
len(a)+1. It's a little ugly, but perhaps just documenting this is no worse
than allowing a string or adding yet another function.
Ralf
> Anne
>
> On 21 September 2010 15:48, Ken Basye wrote:
> > Hi Numpy Folks,
> > A while
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Charles R Harris <
charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Ben Longstaff
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > Warning Message
>> >>> > C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\scipy\io\matlab\mio5.py:90:
>> >>> > RuntimeWarning:
>> >>> > __builtin__.file si
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
>> would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
>>
>> Any Python versions:
>>
>> - #1605 (
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:51 PM, John Mitchell wrote:
> After spending a lot of time building 'numpy' (1.5.0) and 'scipy' (0.8.0)
> I ran the following tests -- per what I read somewhere:
> numpy.test()
>
> Out of several thousand small tests I found this one error -- perhaps its
> not really an
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> There are two Python 2.7 installers available at python.org a 32 bit
> version for MacOS X 10.3.9 and later and a 64 bit version for Mac OS X
> 10.5 and later.
>
> There is one numpy 1.5.0 binary installer for Mac Python 2.7. Which Mac
> p
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
&
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
> Just asking,
> Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? I
> don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some...
>
> That would be helpful. Please backport any bug fixes that you think are
important.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>
> I agree that this is a good idea to have this minor release with as few
> changes as possible. This allows us to clearly state everything has moved to
> git and localize any problems that users should not have related to the
> switch. That
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Nils Becker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what about the normed=True bug in numpy.histogram? It was discussed here
> a while ago, and fixed (although i did not find it on the tracker), but
> the message
>
>
>
> suggests it just missed 1.5.0? I don't have 1.5 installed, so I ca
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 10/ 6/10 12:49 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that
> > would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series:
> >
> > Any Python versions:
> >
> > - #1605 (Cython vs
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Peter <
numpy-discuss...@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> Just FYI:
>
> The DEV_README.txt file needs a trivial update to talk about git not SVN
>
> Thanks, fixed in commit a8441313.
Ralf
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Jonathan March wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Jonathan March
> wrote:
> >> It appears that the numpy testing decorators for skipping and for
> >> known failure should behave similarly to each other, at least f
bot.scipy.org/, but it does not
build/install binaries. I also just noticed it has not been updated for the
switch to git - perhaps an indication of how much attention we're paying to
it.
Ralf
> Vincent
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> &
Hi Friedrich,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/9 Vincent Davis :
> > Did you get any responses on this? I can install 10.5 and help out
> > with some testing. I have a macbookpro that does not turn of (Hardware
> > issue) but it i
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Vincent Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Hi Friedrich,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> 2010/10/9 Vincent Davis :
> &g
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > Yes I got one response at http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1322, a
> > negative one unfortunately.
>
> For what it's worth, the posted binary seems to work fine on my OS-X
> 10
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> Vincent Davis wrote:
> > Ok, Friedrich and I are working on setting up a machine for building
> > on 10.5 and hope (I do) to have that going for 1.5.1rc1
> > I hope to do a 10.6 for 1.5rc1 also.
>
> why have a separate 10.6 build?
>
> A
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Vincent Davis wrote:
> Ok so this is more of a git question but and I think it might be
> simple I just don't get it.
> Lets say I get a copy of numpy,
> $git clone http://github.com/numpy/numpy.git
> and now I what install the 1.4.1 release which is a "tag"
> or
>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> On 10/13/10 8:30 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > For what it's worth, the posted binary seems to work fine on my OS-X
> > 10.5 PPC system (python2.6), so maybe the PPC part works, the Intel
> part
> >
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One more question: Do we support any external library in the official
> binaries? I've heard the names MKL and BLAS, LAPACK, ... all stuff I
> don't know really tbh, but do we have to install them?
>
> No,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/15 Christopher Barker :
> > On 10/15/10 10:54 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> >> I have a 10.4 Intel machine I keep around
> >> for the sole purpose of building backward-compatible binary installers
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Friedrich Romstedt <
friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just poked around the newly created files, and here they are:
>
> The dmg:
>
> http://friedrichromstedt.org/numpy/Release/10-10-16/01-numpy-2.0.0.dev-py2.5-python.org.dmg
> (just to be sure: PREL
Hi all,
With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org
(10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming
scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide
two corresponding installers with the same arches. I propose the
following:
"num
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers :
>> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org
>> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming
>> scheme is needed for the numpy binarie
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers :
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
>> wrote:
>>> 2) I noticed that the paver at some late point tried to switch from
>>> py2.5 to py2.6, what is rather s
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Vincent Davis
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org
>> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to
Hi Friedrich,
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and
> 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my
> power.
Thanks for working so hard, but please don't burn yourself out - w
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Jonathan Rocher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You might want to try using easy_install
>> sudo easy_install numpy
>
> For some doc about it, see
> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall
>
easy_install really does not help to do a numpy install from source,
and ma
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> 2010/10/17 Stéfan van der Walt :
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> IIRC, they recommended pushing from local branches to master on github and
>>> not mergin
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release
candidate of NumPy 1.5.1. This is a bug-fix release with no new
features compared to 1.5.0.
Binaries, sources and release notes can be found at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/.
A note on the available binaries for OS
2010/10/17 Stéfan van der Walt :
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, they recommended pushing from local branches to master on github and
>> not merging master to the development branches. That doesn't sound right to
>> me, but perhaps I misunderstood...
>
> T
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Vincent Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am pleased to announce the availability of the first release
>> candidate of NumPy 1.5.1. This is a bug-fix release with no new
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Vincent Davis wrote:
> python2.7 10.5, osx 10.6, numpy 1.5.1rc1
> Test pass when run from python prompt (see bottom) but fail when run
> from $nosetests numpy.
That is expected, see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/40781.
Cheers,
Ralf
Hi Friedrich,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a summary of what we got so far with the Mac OS X build process:
Thanks for the detailed info on what you are doing. First maybe a
general comment: the current release scripts work quite well, so it's
prob
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> 2010/10/25 Vincent Davis :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:29 PM, wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Ralf Gommers
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Vincent Davis
>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> I was tearing my hear out yesterday evening with trying to find out
> and to understand how this directories occur in the build process and
> what role they play:
>
> build_doc/
This is just where the generated pdf's are copied to, see
file left over from an install of the master
branch.
Cheers,
Ralf
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Ralf Gomme
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> I found some issues on Mac OS X 10.5 ppc in py2.5.4:
>
> See here:
>
> http://github.com/friedrichromstedt/numpy/tree/release%2F1.5.1rc1%2Fpy2.5-python.org-macosx10.3/release/logs/osx105rh/
The inf/exp failures should be marked as known
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:46 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just committed a quick fix for
> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1637. I did want to include it
> for 1.5.x branch as it is already in RC stage, but it may still be
> useful to do so if the release managers think it is app
Hi Friedrich,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> wrote:
>> I found some issues on Mac OS X 10.5 ppc in py2.5.4:
Can you please check if this takes care of all test failures you
reported: http://github.com/rg
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Friedrich Romstedt
wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> 2010/11/1 Ralf Gommers :
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
>>> wrote:
>>>> I found som
Hi,
If you had an issue recently trying to compile scipy on OS X, can you
please try to install numpy from
http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commits/farchs and then compile
scipy?
A quick review from a numpy.distutils expert would also be very
welcome. Related (long) discussion at
http://projects.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Vincent Davis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you had an issue recently trying to compile scipy on OS X, can you
>> please try to install numpy from
>> http://gith
901 - 1000 of 1209 matches
Mail list logo
