Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

Thanks Oliver! 2016-04-28 16:37 GMT+02:00 Deisbel Diaz : > Hi: > > Yesterday I requested unsubscribe myself from this list and I received the > confirmation, but I still continue receiving these emails. > > Any idea? > > Thanks > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Oliver Lietz

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

Hi: Yesterday I requested unsubscribe myself from this list and I received the confirmation, but I still continue receiving these emails. Any idea? Thanks On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2016 16:46:45 Michael Dürig wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

On Thursday 28 April 2016 14:16:27 Alex Parvulescu wrote: > Indeed, at least he has one candidate :) > > For the -1s though, there was a piece missing ("Please justify any veto as > otherwise it is non binding."). So if he really dislikes all those options, > it would be nice to provide some

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

Sorry, bad sight on my side. Anyway, to consider all of those -1's as binding, we would need an explanation. The voting email explicitly asks for that. 2016-04-28 14:05 GMT+02:00 Manfred Baedke : > Oliver voted +1 for oak-segment-tar. :) > > > On 4/28/2016 1:43 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

Oliver voted +1 for oak-segment-tar. :) On 4/28/2016 1:43 PM, Francesco Mari wrote: Hi Oliver, If I understand your mail correctly, you gave a -1 to every proposed option. Can you be a little bit more constructive about your approach, or explain the message that is evidently hidden in your

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

Hi Oliver, If I understand your mail correctly, you gave a -1 to every proposed option. Can you be a little bit more constructive about your approach, or explain the message that is evidently hidden in your email? Regards, Francesco 2016-04-28 11:43 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz

Re: [VOTE] Please vote for the final name of oak-segment-next

On Monday 25 April 2016 16:46:45 Michael Dürig wrote: > Hi, > > There is a couple of names that came up in the discussion [1]: > > oak-local-store > oak-segment-file > oak-embedded-store > oak-segment-store > oak-segment-tar > oak-segment-next > > Please vote which of the above six options you