On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Svante Schubert wrote:
I am sorry, but I was being told that there will be no re-contribution
of the ODFDOM fork.
That's a shame, it might've helped catalyse some more interest
Since it isn't coming, can we take any ideas from it at least? Any areas
that people could
Hello Nick,
I am sorry, but I was being told that there will be no re-contribution of
the ODFDOM fork.
This is sad as the new functionality is the mapping of an ODF document to a
sequence of user changes (meant for collaboration such as to be sent to web
browser offices and receiving similar
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Dave Fisher wrote:
There are several patches just submitted in JIRA.
This is promising.
Yup, very much so!
Can someone, who knows the codebase, please review them ASAP, and then
give the nice Mr Raimund feedback and/or apply them? :)
Nick
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Svante Schubert wrote:
Let's see if the owner of the fork can be awaken, I have forwarded your
plea.
Great, thanks
In addition I will take some time to think about possible futures of the
project, it would be a shame to go into the attic as some parts, for
instance the
Hi
It's sad to see how Apache POI got so far, yet the parser for the more open
document format is still struggling in the incubator!
I was playing with #402 a few weeks ago, trying to use Commons Compress
instead of java.util.zip to do ZIP I/O, and even a patched version of
Commons Compress to
That was Denis. Purely a single point
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It's sad to see how Apache POI got so far, yet the parser for the more open
> document format is still struggling in the incubator!
>
> I was playing
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the wakening call.
Let's see if the owner of the fork can be awaken, I have forwarded your
plea.
In addition I will take some time to think about possible futures of the
project, it would be a shame to go into the attic as some parts, for
instance the ODF validator -