Re: [onap-discuss] vFW demo-VES integration #integration

Jing, Which VES library are you using? Is it the one in the demo repository or something else? Marco From: on behalf of Jing Wang Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , "jing.wa...@huawei.com" Date: Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 5:30 PM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" Subject:

[onap-discuss] Reminder to update both docker manifests

Hi all, Reminder: As you release your docker images, please be sure to update both docker manifests (release and staging). As an example, if you release 1.3.0, please update the release manifest to 1.3.0, and also remember to bump the staging manifest to the next version (e.g.

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Create/Activate BB NPE

Steve, here is the bug https://jira.onap.org/browse/SO-1130 Yuriy, you have to empty all the userParams section. I tested this already, and it’s working. I mean I’m failing later in the game, but I’m passing that specific error. > On Oct 11, 2018, at 6:53 PM, MALAKOV, YURIY wrote: > >

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Create/Activate BB NPE

Steve, It may be an issue with the payload request for create and activate. I’m not expecting the create-activate BB to have the user parameters being passed from VID b/c all the assignment are completed in previous flow. Can you confirm if this is a valid payload request.

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Create/Activate BB NPE

Can open a bug, not sure if we want to reject the request all together or simply drop the params. Thanks -Steve From: on behalf of Alexis de Talhouet Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" , "adetalhoue...@gmail.com" Date: Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 5:30 PM To: onap-discuss ,

[onap-discuss] vFW demo-VES integration #integration

Hi community, While playing with the latest VES evel library and vFW reporting agent c code in the demo project, I notice that the vFW reporting agent is posting empty json body in the request to the collector. Once I change the evel initialization in the agent code to set the backup FQDN

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Create/Activate BB NPE

What I found out is this comment in the code: https://github.com/onap/so/blob/3d249b7ac314a5cd59e117672d4b678d33e34c7a/bpmn/so-bpmn-tasks/src/main/java/org/onap/so/bpmn/infrastructure/workflow/tasks/WorkflowAction.java#L242-L245

MACRO Instantiation Failure-- [onap-discuss] [SO] Create/Activate BB

Hi Steve, Can you please help with the investigation on the create & activate building block failure. The payload request is include in the JIRA as well. https://jira.onap.org/browse/SO-1130 stacktrace for the JIRA • {{``` 201810-11T16:09:59.721Z|0ffe7281-4756-4a02-aa84-67f530c37dca|

Re: [onap-discuss] Jackson replacement agenda item for ONAP PTL meeting

Hi all, I haven't looked at the nature of the security vulnerability in Jackson, but would it make sense to consider an alternative solution - paying the Jackson community to fix the vulnerability? It might be more cost effective than the cost of  manpower needed to move away from Jackson

Re: [onap-discuss] Jackson replacement agenda item for ONAP PTL meeting

Thanks Keong for bringing this. We can discuss at PTL meeting. I think 2-3 weeks ago Pam brought similar concerns. We may want to consolidate across teams so we can all use the same. I see in your analysis at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Using+Google+gson+vs+FasterXML+Jackson you have

Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]: DGBuilder UI error

Hi Brian, thanks for the info, we will check on this in our Beijing Lab. In the meantime I checked it on our Casablanca Lab, where I can confirm, that it works. Best regards Andreas -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12960):

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Process retries forever

Ok, thank you for the pointers Steve. Alexis > On Oct 11, 2018, at 10:53 AM, SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN wrote: > > Rainy_Day_Handling Table configures this, I am pretty sure we pushed a fix to > the infinite retries though. It should cap at whatever is configured in the > database, you can set the

Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] Process retries forever

Rainy_Day_Handling Table configures this, I am pretty sure we pushed a fix to the infinite retries though. It should cap at whatever is configured in the database, you can set the default action to rollback or abort if you do not wish to have a retry. Thanks -Steve On 10/11/18, 10:43

[onap-discuss] [SO] Process retries forever

Hello SO team, I pulled latest Dockerimage, and when there is a failure in the flow, default behaviour is retrying forever. Is this intended? Else, is there a way to configure this behaviour? Thanks, Alexis -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] Who is using SB-01?

Since no one responded, we will be shutting down the SB-01 instance in a couple of hours. Thanks, Gary _ From: Gary Wu Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 8:26 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [integration] Who is using SB-01? Hi all, Who

Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]: DGBuilder UI error

Display is a real time rendering of a Graphviz picture so most likely the problem is the permission or location of graphviz. I’ve also occasionally had issues with memory in a Heat solution (check the sdnc dgbuilder jira’s) Brian From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Andreas

[onap-discuss] Jackson replacement agenda item for ONAP PTL meeting

Hi Pam and Gildas, During the AAI weekly meeting, we discussed the replacement of FasterXML Jackson library in AAI code: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Using+Google+gson+vs+FasterXML+Jackson Having shared it with the Seccom meeting, we thought it might be a good topic to share with the PTLs.

Re: [onap-discuss] [APPC]: DGBuilder UI error

Hi Taka, just for clarification.  The issue Chandrashekhar, is reporting about is happening in the default APPC installation via ONAP OOM. We can launch the DGBuilder UI which shows all DGs, but if you press "Display" on any DG the above described error is shown. So I guess the data is loaded

Re: [onap-discuss] Azure_ONAP_Use Case with 2 node VM

Thank you for your valuable time and for supporting in the ONAP Deployment process. On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:28 AM Thamlur Raju wrote: > I have sent the zoom invitation from 2:30 PM to 4:00 PM. > >> will complete as soon as possible. > > The invitation link is , >

[onap-discuss] [VID][AAI][integration]

Hi, We're performing tests on Windriver project: Integration-SB07. Since yesterday distributed services are not visible in VID. Also we've notice problem in communication between AAI-ml and UEB. This looks like UEB was restarted and some services are not authorized for topic

Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] StatefulSet not removed while Delete/Purge a project

When I purge the project, I usually do “kubectl delete namespace ” and it takes care of most resources. Thanks, Borislav Glozman O:+972.9.776.1988 M:+972.52.2835726 [amdocs-a] Amdocs a Platinum member of ONAP From:

Re: [External] 答复: [onap-discuss] VFC ( gvnfm) - VNF IP details in AAI

Thanks Yan. Regards Mandeep From: Yan Yang Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 12:19 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Singh Kalra, Mandeep Subject: 答复: [External] 答复: [onap-discuss] VFC ( gvnfm) - VNF IP details in AAI Hi Mandeep, Yes, we are doing the POC for supporting 5G PNF and

答复: [External] 答复: [onap-discuss] VFC ( gvnfm) - VNF IP details in AAI

Hi Mandeep, Yes, we are doing the POC for supporting 5G PNF and VNF Orchestration in this release, and in the future , we plan to support more 5G use case. Best Regards, Yan 发件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] 代 表 Mandeep Singh Kalra 发送时间:

[onap-discuss] Suggestions for new #aai schema service proposal

Hi Jimmy and Harish, As discussed at the AAI weekly meeting on the 10th, please see my suggestions for the AAI schema service based on analysis of the CCVPN schema changes in Casablanca release: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Use+Cases+for+AAI+Schema+Service+Proposal It's also added to the