Joel Halpern of Ericsson is leading the project. I think that suggestions
should go to him directly.
In the meantime, when we get a chance, some of the members of the IM
Guidelines group will post to ONAP some of the more serious problems with
the existing IISOMI guidelines. This is why we are rew
If you have any questions or comments regarding MEF's use of modeling
guidelines, or modeling techniques, please let me know and I will
communicate your request to the MEF committee chairs and the CTO.
-Jessie
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:15 PM, John Strassner wrote:
> Actually, the MEF is NOT usin
Actually, the MEF is NOT using these guidelines anymore, mainly due to the
errors with respect to UML interpretation and the restrictions placed on
what UML artifacts can be used in a model.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM, jessie jewitt <
jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote:
> You are correc
You are correct that it is not an "industry standard" like an IEEE spec. It
is an informal agreement by industry players to use the same UML Modeling
Guidelines. The ONF, ETSI, and MEF use these guidelines, even though you
personally may choose not to do so.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM, John S
I'm sorry, but IISOMI is NOT an "industry standard". It is an "informal
agreement" that has some consensus among some parts of the industry.
In fact, it contains a number of incorrect conclusions about what UML is
and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs.
John
On Wed, Apr
Hello Hui and Lingli-
I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072
do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML
Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515)
defined here:
http
