[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 7

Hi guys, Thanks for attending the service modeling call earlier today. The meeting related information including agenda, minutes and recordings are available on the wiki now: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+IM+Discusssion+Calls Cheers, Lingli __

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

rg [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Michela Bevilacqua > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:09 AM > *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model > > > > Hi, > > I share some questions ab

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

Hi Michela From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michela Bevilacqua Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:09 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model Hi, I share some questions

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling session registration in ONS 2017

Hello all As we discussed yesterday modeling call, we create two wiki page for 2 onap modeling session on Sunday afternoon and Friday monning, If you are able to attend, please fill in your info to the registration spreadsheet, really thanks LFN and MEF sponsor them Sunday afternoon: https://wi

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of yangxu (H) Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 9:56 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls Hi All, I was about to mention the results of our two

[onap-discuss] [modeling]

The results of the modeling tool poll regarding GitHub taken here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Are 14 people approve the use of GitHub. Nobody is opposed. So we will proceed with the use of GitHub. -Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailin

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Support for HPA in SOL001 mapping

I'm not seeing the support in the SOL001 spec for all the HPA related attributes in the IM that we are specifying here: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710 For example, in our VirtualCpuDesc class there is an attribute vduCpuRequirements that says gets mapped to tosca.data

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Identifiers in R2 IM descriptors

As I'm unable to attend the early discussions regarding the R2 IM model, I hope you will please take my feedback into consideration. The ETSI descriptors (classes) that we map into R2 IM descriptor classes all have identifiers, i.e. VNFDesc (vnfdId), VDUDesc (vduId), etc. The ETSI datatypes that

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Resource TOSCA Data model

...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Nguyenphu, Thinh (Nokia - US/Irving) Sent: den 5 mars 2018 22:14 To: jessie jewitt ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001 Hi Jessie, Your summary below shows there are a lot of inconsistency of TOSCA types naming

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

range” highlighted text) are not yet defined. > > > > Perhaps, I can introduce this page at Modeling sub_committee on Tuesday > call. > > > > Thinh > > > > *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] *On Beha

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls

Hi All, I was about to mention the results of our two polls but got not enough time to do so. 1) Naming Convention Poll (I also count in two opinions expressed in the comments): Option 1: 16 people, 6 company Option 3: 8 people, 3 company Option 1 takes the lead, and if there’re no f

[onap-discuss] [modeling] HPA poll and remaining issues

Hi All, As requested, here’s my summary for the next steps for HPA issue. I’ve created a poll page regarding whether (and how) to put certain attribute into the R2 IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/HPA+Attributes+Poll Please add comments or supporting materials to that page as you wish. I hop

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 7

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ATTENDEE;

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 16.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ATTENDEE;

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

this page at Modeling sub_committee on Tuesday call. Thinh From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 1:20 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping

[onap-discuss] [modeling] SOL001 DM mapping

This is a resend, as I didn't see the message show up in the modeling discussion. My apology if you have already received it. == This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM to

[onap-discuss] [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6

Hi all, Welcome to join us for reviving the service modeling discussion thread this week. Here is the proposed meeting logistics: Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue, March 6 Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Based on the latest contributions on

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #9 invitation

\, ElementGroup\, L3AddressData\, HPA\, etc.)\ nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180305T230000 DTSTAMP:20180304T075613Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180305T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180304T07563

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Data model mapping using SOL001

This message is particularly directed to Anatoly, Alex, and Thinh, as we have an action item to map ONAP IM to DM. If one of you could respond, I'd appreciate it. My understanding is that SOL001 is mapping the VNFD model to TOSCA. They indicate they are mapping the ETSI NFV elements listed below

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Reminder From: denghui (L) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:33 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018 Hello all Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018 https://doodle.com/poll/a95qs5bg5fwm

[onap-discuss] [modeling] R2 IM Class diagram

Hello- I'm looking for the class diagram that corresponds to the classes defined here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version One would think it would be the diagram that is on the ONAP R2+ Resource IM Clean Version wiki page: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.actio

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi- I'm trying to understand how the IM model proposed for R2 compares to IFA011. When I look on this wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 it looks like the IFA011 model was reviewed and decisions were made. For example, in the VNFD, one decision was t

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #8 invitation

ime":20180301T230000 DTSTAMP:20180228T192313Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180301T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180228T192329Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:11 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

the class/attribute) of ETSI names with ONAP ones Option 3: Option 2 + feedback to ETSI about the changes Please help to cast your vote Thanks DENG Hui From: yangxu (H) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:22 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss][modeling] Reminder for

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Hello all Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018 https://doodle.com/poll/a95qs5bg5fwmskdg Thanks a lot Deng Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/o

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling subcommittee call meeting minutes

Hello all The meeting minutes is here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings copy below I am sending out poll on day of modeling workshop today Best regards, DENG Hui 20180227 Meeting agenda and Minutes Deadline for modeling spec is M3: Mar. 7th Implementation of mo

[onap-discuss] [modeling] GitHub poll

This is a reminder that the poll regarding use of GitHub with Papyrus will close tomorrow. Here is the link to the poll: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org http

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #7 invitation

ime":20180228T230000 DTSTAMP:20180227T193048Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180228T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180227T193106Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:10 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion #7 TR

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

Hello all, There're two votes ongoing related to information model design and the deadline is approaching. If you haven't voted, please see the following wiki pages and provide your opinions. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Naming+Convention+Poll https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Time+P

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

Hello all Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed. Thanks a lot for you review Best regards, DENG Hui <> ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.o

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #6 invitation

Time":20180223T23 DTSTAMP:20180222T072749Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180223T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180222T073031Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:6 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM d

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI

AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI In our modeling meeting last week we discussed making a formal contribution to ETSI. Does ONAP have an official liaison relationship to ETSI? If so, is there a process we follow for making contributions? Thanks

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Liaison to ETSI

In our modeling meeting last week we discussed making a formal contribution to ETSI. Does ONAP have an official liaison relationship to ETSI? If so, is there a process we follow for making contributions? Thanks, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-d

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Poll for use of GitHub

Please vote on the poll regarding the use of GitHub for versioning of Papyrus models. It is located at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+Tool+Poll The poll closes on 2/28/18. Thank you, Jessie ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.o

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes

p.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L) Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:46 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes Hello all Modeling subcommittee has been questioned when will our modeling DM sp

[onap-discuss] [modeling] 20180213 modeling subcommittee Meeting Minutes

Hello all Modeling subcommittee has been questioned when will our modeling DM spec come out, below are our meeting minutes this week. Hi Kenny, We are going to cancel next week modeling subcommittee call due to china new year, thanks a lot for your help

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #4 Feb 12th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on Cpd, ExtCpd, VduCpd and the leftovers in Vdu class. The agreements will be updated in the clean version tomorrow, the link is: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version Other issues: .

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #5 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is VduProfile, VirtualNetworkInterface and LogicalNodeData. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Tue Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could jo

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #3 Feb 9th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on VDU (with a few leftover attributes), SwImageDesc, VirtualComputeDesc, VirtualCpuData/VirtualCpuDesc, VirtualMemoryData/VirtualMemoryDesc, VirtualStorageDesc and LogicalNodeDesc class models, the agreements

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #4 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is Cpd, ExtCpd, VduCpd and Vdu undecided attributes. Start Time: 7 am US eastern (8 pm Beijing) Mon Length: 2 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could join. Be

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #3 invitation

Hi All, This is an invitation for the discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is continuing the discussion of VDU model. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Fri Length: 1 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all interested people could join. Best regards

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #2 Feb 8th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on the VNFD top level model, I’ll try to capture them in the clean version page below: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version The discussion on the VDU part has been started and will b

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #2 reminder

Hi All, This is a late reminder for today’s discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. The topic is continuing the discussion of VNFD top level (i.e. VNFDesc) and VDU models. Start Time: 7 am US eastern (8 pm Beijing) Thu Length: 2 hour Meeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979 Wish all

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting Notes for ONAP IM discussion call Feb 7th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! The information of the inputs can be found in the following wiki pages: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class%3A+VNFDesc For those who haven’t a chance to join, the summary is that we dis

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]VDU Solution from ETSI

Hi Anatoly, Since we are talking about the VDU DM, can I suggest the ETSI VDU DM as reference for more discussion. Here is the link on wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Alternative+VDU+design+from+TOSCA Thanks in advance. BR Victor _

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call reminder

Hi All, This is a reminder for tomorrow’s discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. Tomorrow’s topic is VNFD top level (i.e. VNFDesc) and VDU models, we’ll try to agree on the attributes/associations of these two parts. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed Length: 1 hour Meeting

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hi Brian Yes, could you kindly help to do it under modeling tools wiki page? Thanks a lot for your help Best regards, DENG Hui From: Brian Hedstrom [mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:12 PM To: denghui (L) Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@list

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Kenny From latest program: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF2F+Feb.+5-8%2C+2017 We are starting from 9:30am eastern time , which is 10:30pm Beijing time Thanks a lot for your reminder Best regards, DENG Hui From: Kenny Paul [mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Deng, I'll cxl next week's call even though these requests should always be routed throgh the wiki page Meeting Requests, Changes, Hosting & Recording I don’t understand the sentence that follows however. Not sure if this is a requ

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hi Deng Hui, Wed 6:00AM PST clashes with the SDNC weekly call. We should avoid this overlap for next week's vF2F if possible. Thank you Parviz --- PARVIZ YEGANI, PhD Chief SDN/NFV Architect CTO Office, Cloud Network Solutions FutureWei Technologies, Inc. 2330 Central Express Way Santa Clar

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

. BR Michela From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Brian Hedstrom Sent: den 2 februari 2018 16:12 To: denghui (L) Cc: jessie jewitt ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org P Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hi Deng, I'm in favor of using Git for model development. Do we want to add a Poll page to the wiki to track participant voting on this topic? Thanks Brian On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:31 PM, denghui (L) wrote: > Hello modeling subcommittee, > > > > Many Thanks to Jessie’s kind presentation on Git

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Modeling call next week

Hello all Our modeling subcommittee call will be cancelled next week due to vf2f, Hi Kenny, could you kindly help to cancel next week call, thanks a lot and we will have our modeling subcommittee session on Wednesday 9am eastern time, 10pm Beijing time. 1) Resource IM Xu Yang 2) Service IM

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call Feb. 1st meeting notes

Hi, Thank you all for joining the call! Here’s the meeting notes: 1) Focus on the word document for now: - Identify the parts that could be stable before M2 and try to reach consensus - Word doc format: IFA011(ETSI) like format - Process: reach consensus in meeting calls, and then move the consen

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Whether How and when we should move to Github for modeling spec update process

Hello modeling subcommittee, Many Thanks to Jessie's kind presentation on GitHub for Papyrus model. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/GitHub%20for%20Papyrus%20Model.pptx?api=v2 Due to time limitation, we would

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

better yet, to move things back and forth between the two tools. Regards, Kevin From: MAYER, ANDREW J Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:58 AM To: yangxu (H) ; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; August-Wilhelm Jagau ; Michela Bevilacqua Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

yang...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:03 AM To: SCAGGS, KEVIN ; MAYER, ANDREW J Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting Hi Kevin & Andy, I think it’s time to discuss how to start the Papyrus work and make a concrete agreement/speci

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

Hi Kevin & Andy, I think it’s time to discuss how to start the Papyrus work and make a concrete agreement/specification for R2’s information model. Are you available at 8:00 a.m. US eastern time (9:00 p.m. Beijing time) on Thursday or Friday? Let’s have one hour discussion on this and try to add

[onap-discuss] [modeling] the training videos of Papyrus have been updated

Hello all Many thanks to Nigel who has kindly help to update all videos, please feel free to study them online. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+tools Best regards, DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://li

[onap-discuss] [ONAP-discuss] [modeling] VNFD UML files

Hi Brian, I’ve uploaded the papyrus files of the VNFD UML to the wiki as you requested. You can find it under: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions Or directly by the link: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/vnfd%20uml%20diagram%20files.zip?api=v

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Davis, Nigel Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 11:55 PM To: denghui (L) ; am8...@att.com Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version Hi, I propose we use 3.2.0 RC4 which

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

??? I thought the latest release of Papyrus is 3.1.0, which I am running with Oxygen 2. Could you be more specific? regards, John On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Davis, Nigel wrote: > Hi, > > > > I propose we use 3.2.0 RC4 which is the latest stable release and then we > stick with that (until

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

Hi, I propose we use 3.2.0 RC4 which is the latest stable release and then we stick with that (until we find features in a new version of Papyrus that we need). I will need to do a small update to the video to provide instructions on how to load that. That will take me a couple of days. I have

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus trianing video

Hello all The video is posted here, please feel free to study it for our future IM design. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+tools https://zoom.us/recording/play/hifhg4gm8ZqlA-LkeM9qqsNiG3JMq4qdeFilqdKXK6wcYabYufNH86MhaTlEjJHY Thanks again for Nigel Davis's kind help on this Best regards

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

Hi Nigel Could you kindly help to advice what's final version for papyrus for modeling team? Thanks a lot for your kind help. Hi Andy, Have you recorded Nigel's training about Papyrus last Friday? Thanks a lot for your kind help Best regards, DENG Hui

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling tool Papyrus trianing session

-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling tool Papyrus trianing session Hello all We are very honor to invite Nigel Davis to give a tutorial about Papyrus which will be used for ONAP Info modeling. Since Modeling subcommittee is full of schedule every week. We arrange this tutorial on this Friday VNFSDK

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling tool Papyrus trianing session

Hello all We are very honor to invite Nigel Davis to give a tutorial about Papyrus which will be used for ONAP Info modeling. Since Modeling subcommittee is full of schedule every week. We arrange this tutorial on this Friday VNFSDK Modeling sub-team session. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/201

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop notes

Hello All ONAP Modeling workshop minutes 1 Service IM: back to service(customer facing service)/service component(resource facing service, e.g. network service)/resource/resource component layering class diagram, not using composite/decorative pattern for Beijing, translate into papyrus

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Workshop on Thursday

In case you didn’t find it on the wiki, the Zoom ID is 349619781 From: on behalf of Kanagaraj Manickam Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 12:59 AM To: "denghui (L)" , "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Workshop on T

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

I agree on clear use of Terminology. That is why I said in my presentation that in the MEF Core Model, we define a MEFNetworkFunction to differentiate it from an ETSI NFV network function. That being said, let's look at the definition of Network Function from ETSI GS NFV 003 v1.2.1: *Network F

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

All, My 2 cents. It really is becoming imperative to agree on ONAP terminology. During today's CIM WS presentation from John Strassner, it became obvious that how we define the ONAP information model is dependent on terminology. We can have 10 different IMs and all of them may be right in the cont

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

Hello all There is a small change to let Kevin present first about IM then let SDO to discuss it later. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+Workshop+Program Thanks a lot DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org htt

[onap-discuss] [modeling]Zoom ID for ONAP modeling workshop

Hello all Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/349619781 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16699006833,,349619781# or +16465588656,,349619781# Or Te

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Workshop on Thursday

denghui (L) Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:19 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Workshop on Thursday Hello all Tomorrow workshop venue address is: Huawei Technologies Checkin: Bldg B Meeting Venue: Bldg C 1F-05 Training Room 2330 Central

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling Workshop on Thursday

Hello all Tomorrow workshop venue address is: Huawei Technologies Checkin: Bldg B Meeting Venue: Bldg C 1F-05 Training Room 2330 Central Expressway Santa Clara, CA 95050 Check-in Instruction: 1) All attendees must use self sign in system to check in at the main reception desk located at Bl

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling session today - Update

Hello all There is one mistake, updated again 1) 11:20 Considerations of Modelling Evolution in ONAP Michela Bevilacqua Room: Audito

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling session today

Hello all This is the day before tomorrow workshop, today session related to modeling will be : 1) 11:20 Considerations of Modelling Evolution in ONAP Michela Bevilacqua

[onap-discuss] [modeling] A&AI Runtime for VNF and VNFC Instance

Hi Jimmy and Chesla https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Run+Time+Model+Clean+Version Yang Xu Please add description of mandatory and optional on the wiki page Please help to review it? Thanks DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.on

[onap-discuss] [modeling] today modeling teleconf is cancelled.

Hello all Apologize for not considering thanks giving holiday, lots of people are still not yet return back, so we will cancel this week teleconf. Best regards, DENG Hui ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

Thank you, Eric From: eric.deb...@orange.com [mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:09 PM To: denghui (L); DeWayne Filppi; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing Hello I will help DeWayne Eric De : denghui (L

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

Hello I will help DeWayne Eric De : denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com] Envoyé : jeudi 16 novembre 2017 03:16 À : DeWayne Filppi; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Cc : DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN Objet : RE: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing Hi Eric Since you contributed this part document

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing The ARIA REST API is contributed code to the ONAP project; ARIA includes a Python library and CLI. Runtime ARIA in ONAP lives in a container ( https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=so.git;a=blob;f=packages/docker/src/main/docker/docker

[onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

The ARIA REST API is contributed code to the ONAP project; ARIA includes a Python library and CLI. Runtime ARIA in ONAP lives in a container ( https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=so.git;a=blob;f=packages/docker/src/main/docker/docker-files/Dockerfile.aria). Also contributed to ONAP is a Java bindin

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

Hi All, Well, I personally do think there must be something better than ‘javatoscaparser’. I don’t think the language/environment is relevant as part of the name (java) and also, the tool is more than just a parser (that is why is called ‘checker’ through the code). Documentation wise, in the s

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

ARIA is a TOSCA parser and an execution engine. It is being integrated with the SO project to execute TOSCA models as part of SO https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=so.git;a=tree;f=aria;h=ff0868f67348985cd6053f0848020d0a1eabf8fb;hb=HEAD On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:22 PM wrote: > Thanks Arthur > >

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

Thanks Arthur But how this parser/component is used within ONAP ? Best Regards Eric De : Arthur Berezin [mailto:art...@cloudify.co] Envoyé : mardi 7 novembre 2017 18:16 À : denghui (L) Cc : DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN; JORA, SERBAN; Rittwik Jana; art...@gigaspaces.com; shang.xiaod...@zte.com.cn; meng.

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling Project doc missing

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:39 PM denghui (L) wrote: > Hi Eric, Trimed and inline please, == > > > > > Hi Serban, there is one question from Eric for you below > > Hi Arthur, there is one question from Eric for you inside > > > > > > I think we should provide more example how to use it bot using CL

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Please help to register ONAP Modeling workshop on Dec. 14th Thursday

Hello all Please don't do poll any more , just register here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+Workshop+20171214+Registration+Page Please register before Dec. 8th, registrations will be closed on that day. The room will be only limited to 50 people. If we reach that number before t

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop final decision

i (L) Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 10:11 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org Cc: Rittwik Jana Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop final decision Hello all According to doodle poll, there are 25 people prefer Thursday and 10 people prefer Tues

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop final decision

Hello all According to doodle poll, there are 25 people prefer Thursday and 10 people prefer Tuesday. https://doodle.com/poll/8m5nhagvqkfw2uag Because time is so urgent, thanks TSC meeting suggestion, let's do below arrangement: 1) Half day or 2 hours ONAP modeling workshop on Tuesday ( F

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop proposal

Hi Deng, I am the Chair of Modeling efforts in the MEF, and a TMF Distinguished Fellow. I will be available to present MEF modeling strategies and recommendations to help ONAP. regards, John John Strassner, Ph.D. Chair, Modeling, MEF Co-Chair, Intent WG, MEF Rapporteur, Architecture, ETSI ISG EN

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop proposal -- doodle poll

Hello all I created a doodle poll to check it again: https://doodle.com/poll/8m5nhagvqkfw2uag thanks a lot for your input. Best regards, DENG Hui From: Vul, Alex [mailto:alex@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 11:56 PM To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop proposal

Hi, I think this is a really good idea, provided the workshop participants are up-to-speed on what we have been doing, where we need to be going and can hit the ground running. As you said, time is of the essence… Kind regards, Alex Vul Intel Corporation From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] ONAP Modeling workshop proposal

Hello all Modeling subcommittee is in the very tight schedule, plan to have R2 modeling ready by December and intends to call for feedback from SDOs and identify potential cooperation areas. And many SDOs propose to collaborate with ONAP such as MEF/TMF/ETSI NFV, and in order to avoid the confl

[onap-discuss] [modeling]RE: [onap-tsc] Usecase subcommittee meeting 23/10/2017 (wide discussion of Network Slicing)

This is a reminder email to modeling subcommittee, 5G use case would like to invite modeling subcommittee to join their discussion next week, Thanks DENG Hui From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017

[onap-discuss] [modeling] RE: ARC Call this week

Hello all Just remind that is the invite to modeling subcommittee, in the Arc call next Tuesday, they will discuss about external controller issue, Please help to attend it, Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-bou

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Invite comments on modeling design principles and guideline

This is reminder, deadline will be this Sunday. Thanks a lot DENG Hui From: denghui (L) Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 3:24 AM To: onap-discuss ; onap-tsc Subject: [Modeling] Invite comments on modeling design principles and guideline Hello all, We have create a page which list the modeli

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Invite comments on modeling design principles and guideline

Hello all, We have create a page which list the modeling design principles and guidelines for R2+ as below https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+Design+Principles+and+Guidelines Many thanks to Rittwik, David and Lingli for initial contribution, and there were some comments and revision

[onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling design principals and guideline

Hello all Based on the summary of our F2F meeting, please send your suggestions to David, Lingli and Rittwik asap within this week. They agree to kindly help to coordinate this work, many thanks for their help -By Oct 15: set guidelines and principals *Methodology of developing R

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] teleconf of modeling project/subcommittee this week is cancelled

I’ve canceled it. Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager kp...@linuxfoundation.org 510.766.5945 > On Oct 2, 2017, at 1:41 AM, denghui (L) wrote: > > Hello all > > You might know that 1 billion Chinese people are taking vocation this week > all together, so considering

<    1   2   3   4   >