HI;
Just accidentally found this while checking some links ...
Please have this URL:
http://br-pt.openoffice.org/
redirect to
http://www.openoffice.org/pt-br/
cheers,
Pedro.
:48 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
HI;
Just accidentally found this while checking some links
...
Please have this URL:
http://br-pt.openoffice.org/
redirect to
http://www.openoffice.org/pt-br/
cheers,
Pedro.
Hi;
Looking around the net it looks like Google is not happy
about GPLd fonts either so they now have a replacement
to the so-called Liberation fonts:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/09/download-and-use-the-new-chrome-os-fonts-in-ubuntu/
--- Ven 30/12/11, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org ha scritto:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Apparently they are improved versions of the
Liberation
fonts, which Redhat had licensed from the same
designers.
The key feature of Liberation fonts is that they are
metrically equivalent
FWIW ...
--- Dom 25/12/11, John Boyle jbo...@harbornet.com ha scritto:
...
To Dev: What is with this HAPPY HOLIDAY business? Christ
IS a PROVEN HISTORICAL PERSON, BY ATHEISTIC AND AGNOSTIC
SCIENTISTS, Jewish Historians and even Muslim historians,
so you cannot argue he did not!
SO WHY CAN'T
Hello;
Well said!
First of all, absolutely Merry Christmas to everyone and
well deserved best wishes for the upcoming year.
I had always been an outsider to the OOo project so it's
rather unexpected to give my impressions but:
1) I am sure everyone agrees this project had about all
odds
+1
For the few time I spent trying to give different colors
to the new icons, it was clear it was not something that
could be done reasonably well in a weekend.
No need to wait 48 hours: this is lazy consensus at
it's best.
Pedro.
--- Gio 22/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
Hi Drew,
Hello;
--- Gio 22/12/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org ha scritto:
48 hours is too short. The
practice is a minimum of 72 hours for a lazy consensus. (I
am not arguing against your proposal.)
I have no hurry to see this in but I do have to note that
this is exactly what lazy
someone is using lazy consensus
technically correctly when it is thrown into a declaration
or not, and I probably did not use the term correctly
myself. However, if a response time is set, 48 hours
is too short [;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p
--- Mer 21/12/11, Andre Fischer an...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
...
Hi all,
I ran into a problem with a Linux build. On Ubuntu
(both 32bit and 64bit) linking of comphelper failed
with a lot of unresolved references. With the help of
Herbert I could solve this by using a different linker.
Hi Dave;
--- Mer 21/12/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net ha scritto:
...
Pavel,
Thank you for your perspective. I think a properly released
OpenOffice.org 3.3.1 is totally possible.. I recall Martin
came to the list with the idea. We took separate paths.
OOo 3.3.1 is impossible, We
Hello Götz;
First of all welcome! Part of the confusion was indeed that we
had not really hear from TOO and it's goals and future plans.
I am relatively new to both OpenOffice and Apache but one of
the things that motivated me to join is that the Apache
License is very open to business. If you
FWIW,
Martin Hollmichel did write to this list and mentioned he had
the box with the Pootle data available. This was before we
had a running Pootle (Sorry that I am too lazy to look in
the archives ;).
Let's be patient, I am sure they will get to it.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- Mar 20/12/11, Ross
--- Lun 19/12/11, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com ha scritto:
Hi Pedro,
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 06:32 -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I'd prefer to see myself as part of the freedom
loving,
non-corporate dominated group of hackers having
fun.
And that's fine because you are not me
Hello,
I think we just have to remove a lot of stuff that is
not relevant anymore. I'll try my hand at cleaning some
of it but I am just too busy lately and I don't really
like to leave unfinished stuff here and there.
The icon coloring campaign will suffer, sorry :(
Pedro.
--- Lun 19/12/11,
Hi Dave;
--- Lun 19/12/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net ha scritto:
Hi Pedro,
Let's be clear - we need to leave the current page alone as
it is the legacy 3rd party licenses and must be retained.
Not really:
We should not carry the LGPL license text but instead link
to the FSF.
--- Dom 18/12/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:38 PM,
Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
--- Sab 17/12/11, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
Sure - if it is easier for us to include
an existing feature, under an
acceptable license
JIC you missed it in Slashdot:
http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/233753/gpl-copyleft-use-declining-faster-ever
Quoting the article:
...
I don't think projects are moving away from GPL, but that new vendors are
choosing community approaches enabled by permissive licenses, rather than
Hi,
I can fix No. 2, but No. 1 doesnt seem right.
Maybe there is a related patch in Solaris
repositories? Alternatively you could use
the system python.
Cheers,
Pedro.
--- Dom 18/12/11, L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: L'oiseau de mer oiseau...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re:
--- Sab 17/12/11, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
Sure - if it is easier for us to include
an existing feature, under an
acceptable license into LibreOffice why would we bother
re-writing it ?
conversely if it is easier to re-write, why not ?
And it's usually so much easier to take.
Hello;
--- Ven 16/12/11, tora - Takamichi Akiyama t...@openoffice.org ha scritto:
...
Why not 3.3.0? They say 3.2.1 is conceptually stabler than
3.3.0 since 3.2.1 is a minor, bug-fixed version while 3.3.0
is a major version.
Unfortunately the legacy OpenOffice.org releases are
Hi Ariel;
--- Sab 17/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
...
Author: pfg
Date: Sun Dec 18 02:16:34 2011
New Revision: 1220324
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220324view=rev
Log:
An unprofessional attempt to update some logos.
then I'm not sure if this should be done
Hi Oliver;
--- Ven 16/12/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann ha scritto:
...
I think that the prebuilts for module moz (SeaMonkey
version 1.1.4) should be available inside our SVN
repository. One option would be to directly check them in
into folder main/moz/zipped/ where they are needed. Another
I think it's a good idea.
Pedro.
--- Ven 16/12/11, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr ha scritto:
Da: eric b eric.bach...@free.fr
Oggetto: [code] enlight libicudata ?
A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Data: Venerdì 16 dicembre 2011, 06:10
Hi,
FYI : http://eric.bachard.org/news/
Full link :
Hi Ariel;
--- Ven 16/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm going to create a feature branch, named gbuild (I won't
follow the apache-id naming schema, because this was not
my work, nor am I going to be the only one committing code
to it).
And as I said
--- Sab 17/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Data: Sabato 17 dicembre 2011, 00:27
Hi Pedro,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:10:55PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni
wrote:
I'm going to create a feature branch, named
gbuild (I won't
follow the apache-id naming schema
Hi;
--- Gio 15/12/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
This is a good start, and thanks, Pedro, for reaching out
to them.
But we'll need more than a private email to make this
suitable for inclusion in default source releases.
I am aware of this.
I just brought the matter
--- Gio 15/12/11, Marcus (OOo) ha scritto:
However, I still don't see a reason to delete the b/w
icons. Nothing has to be done. The bitmaps are there,
they get into builds, when we have
these icons colored then they become the default and the
b/w can be chosen manually.
Nothing dies in
Hi guys;
Sorry for the breakage (again).
I understand the image(s) in that directory are trademarkedso it has to go out
before the release.
I thought we had removed everything related to BrOffice
already bur there is still some of that in
ooo_custom_images/prj/*.lst
There may still be more in
--- Mer 14/12/11, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
...
There may still be more in the installer set and it's
something that I can't verify in my local build so I
will
revert the removal and open a bugzilla issue about it
for
someone else to play with.
no
--- Mer 14/12/11, Gianluca Turconi ha scritto:
I agree as I've replied to Rob.
Indeed, we already have a volunteer (Pedro) that wants to
do the short term work. ;-)
Really??? ;).
I never meant to volunteer for anything but I did note
that reverting the Hg change was an easy solution:
Hi Andre;
Concerning beanshell, I asked the copyright owner last
week and I got this answer:
Sorry we have taken so long. I hope to get to this the
weekend after next. In the meantime please consider the
codebase to be available under the Apache license.
Don't know how this affects your plans
...@letturefantastiche.com ha scritto:
Il giorno Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:07:39
-0800 (PST)
Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
ha scritto:
I never meant to volunteer for anything but I did
note
that reverting the Hg change was an easy solution: it
is and I can do it if that is the consensus.
No extra work
--- Mer 14/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
In short, I tried:
* empty ooo_custom_images/prj/build.lst
* empty ooo_custom_images/prj/d.lst
* remove ooo_custom_images from
instsetoo_native/prj/build.lst
*
solenv/config/sooo340.ini (this looks obsolete
Hello,
--- Mar 13/12/11, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
BTW: another fix for the current problem would be
converting ucpp to gbuild.
i would love to do that, do you know if it's already
possible to use gbuild to apply our patch process
and trigger a build on the patched sources?
FWIW,
Hi;
Perhaps it's time to retake the famous issue concerning the
unpopular icon coloring change for OpenOffice.org.
It looks like this change:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300/rev/b2b4215e6f9b
caused this reaction:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112141
And while the easy
FWIW;
--- Mar 13/12/11, tj t...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Hi, Claudio,
This is a personal note. I never have contributed a line of
code to the
project, nor was I invited as an initial committer. But I
work hard
around here, on various things like the wiki. The other
members voted me
+1 to the creation of the italian lists.
As for the number of them: I think we should create both now
and review if there is sufficient traffic to maintain them
both once we graduate.
Hi Andre;
--- Ven 2/12/11, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
Hi,
I changed bootstrap.1, fetch_tarballs.sh and ooo.lst to use
the new
ext_sources directory. For details please see issue
118663
(https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118663).
The BSDs (and Solaris?)
Hi Drew;
I thought about something similar but I was not brave
enough to put it together ;). Thanks!!
This is typically bikeshed material:
1) Since the ffs are together and the i has an
additional space it actually looks like it says
Off ice.
2)I would prefer Apache in the Upper left corner,
Hello;
--- Ven 2/12/11, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
...
You should remove the whole target.
i stumbled over the same problem and have already checked
in a fix.
There were some more place where broffice was referenced
and have
cleaned up this.
Maybe we can agree that we build at least
FWIW;
Sleepycat was a company started by some guys from Berkeley
(like in BSD) that wrote the classic bdb still distributed
in the BSD4.4 derived distributions.
The company was later bought by Oracle.
For replacements you probably don't want to go back
to the version in FreeBSD ... I don't know
--- Ven 2/12/11, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
...
build but they are not in commitable shape. I
think I
will go on vacations until the gnumake4 cws is
committed.
thinking about this statement..., no i will not ask further
questions i will forget it ;-)
Heh ...
Hi Andrew and guys;
By the place where the automated build is failing I think this
was caused by the BrOffice removal:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1207925
but instead of reverting I would prefer we take this chance
to find out how to get useful information from the build
Hello guys;
--- On Tue, 11/29/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Michael,
While some might have hoped for another proposal and
discussion prior to action, thank you for going ahead where
there was clearly no consensus for specific action on the
AOO side.
As I see it, this
Hi Drew;
Thank you and others for the vote of confidence.
Up till now I have been focusing on being a committer to
spend more time on the code, which I think is/was essential
to get the project going.
I think most of the critical things I wanted done there are
done or already on their way and
Inspired by Andrea, I did the same with
i113873 - Russian dictionary.
I was actually lazy and instead of unpacking it
and setting things up I actually took it from
LibreOffice: the new dictionary is under a BSD-like
license so that will not be an issue if we resurrect
it.
cheers,
Pedro.
---
Hi guys;
I am not meaning to alienate the Brazilian community or
anything like that. Just wondering if there are thoughts
on BrOffice brand and releases.
AFAICT, BrOffice is not a trademark SUN owned so it was
not transferred to the ASF. I think the BrOffice people
will have to make a proposal
--- Lun 28/11/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
..
- Are we (AOO) allowed to carry BrOffice branding
stuff
in our repository at all?
Why would we want to do that?
I don't know.. you brought it in ;) :
OK;
I have a patch that removes every occurrence of BrOffice,
and the logos.
It actually makes branding simpler but I don't
know if my patch affects the packaging.
I found a reversely related bug in bugzilla so I put
up the patch for testing at:
FWIW;
I think a central site for hosting AOO extensions would be
welcome. It would be fine to have such a site sponsored
by donations and web publicity, and offering a share of
technical support and commercial extensions would be
fine too.
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 11/28/11, Rob Weir
Hi;
First of all ...
+1 To Andrea's general opinion in this email and
welcome as a committer!
I spent some time on the new Italian site (just playing
with Apache CMS) and I updated the links to use relative
URLS and the legal information, but I think thats about
what I was planning to do with
Hello guys;
Maho and I have been battling with an issue related to
the linking order on the vcl module for the FreeBSD
port. A quick look on the gnumake4 CWS, in particular
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/gnumake4/file/b3086537b169/vcl/Library_vcl.mk
makes me think it is fixed there.
I
Hi Eric;
--- On Sat, 11/26/11, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
From: eric b eric.bach...@free.fr
Le 26 nov. 11 à 07:58, eric b a écrit :
Just running a check through the things registered
in the old documentation I found mention of this
libraries/packages:
Neolight
FWIW,
I missed Sablotron from the list.
Apparently it's not used either.
I found a comment about Sablotron in
xmlhelp/util/main_transform.xsl (line 371)
It's not important but probably worth investigating
later on: the new xslt processor may not need that
workaround.
cheers,
Pedro.
...@apache.org wrote:
...
Hi Michael, *
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:04:24AM +0100, Michael Stahl
wrote:
hi Ariel,
On 23.11.2011 17:16, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:08:21AM -0800, Pedro
Giffuni wrote:
FWIW, Michael Stahl had these CWSs in the
pipeline, I hope
+1 from me
I am pretty sure this wont interfere with the IP Clearance
that is left and even there, getting us less dependent on
Dmake is good.
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 11/25/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
...
Hi Pedro, *
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:59:38PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni
Hi;
Just running a check through the things registered in the old
documentation I found mention of this libraries/packages:
Neolight
libmspack
NSIS
I couldn't find them with opengrok so I think the document
is outdated. If someone else sees them, feel free to make
good use of your nearest axe
Hi;
I am not against the update but I found this
Java V8 bridge under AL2 which would further
save licensing issues (and should be faster
than Rhino):
http://code.google.com/p/jav8/
enjoy,
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 11/25/11, Tsutomu Uchino hanya.r...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tsutomu Uchino
Hello Andre;
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
Hi all,
The last open item on the IP clearance wiki page is the
removal of the dictionary module from the AOO source
code.
I think we cannot ship MPL source code either (not even
download+patches). That includes rhino,
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Raphael Bircher wrote:
...
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next
half hour or so :).
Let's wait a little bit longer, that we can do same more
tests. We have time.
I am not sure how long a little bit longer is supposed to
be but I will commit this
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Gianluca Turconi pub...@letturefantastiche.com wrote:
...
Il 24/11/2011 15.01, Pedro Giffuni ha
scritto:
I think we should keep the non copyleft dictionaries
for
reference. I think that leaves us with English,
Russian,
Croatian and I have an old italian version
:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:29:42AM
-0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hunspell is still the main spellchecker in AOO but we
cannot ship the italian dictionary and even the MPL
dictionaries have to be removed from the repository.
Exactly, what do you mean by saying You can go
ahead
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
I think we cannot ship MPL source code either (not
even download+patches). That includes rhino, saxon
and nss/mozilla.
Hm, as far as I understand this we can not ship MPL code in
the source release directly, but the
Hi Jurgen;
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I had understood it the idea is that we shouldn't
be using patches as a workaround to do actual coding
on top of copyleft components, so I guess if the
components are not on by default that is OK.
.
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:29:42AM
-0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hunspell is still the main spellchecker in AOO
but we
cannot ship the italian dictionary and even
the MPL
dictionaries have to be removed from
24.11.2011 um 15:57 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:29:42AM -0800, Pedro
Giffuni wrote:
Hunspell is still the main spellchecker in AOO but
we
cannot ship the italian dictionary and even the
MPL
dictionaries have to be removed from
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case the project is not going to grind to a halt
every time you are unsure. If you think we are doing
something wrong then you need to back that with some
authority, a link to a policy statement or authoritative
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
This attitude from you is hardly surprising because we
all
know you have all the answers :-P.
It is memory not attitude. I don't know all the answers,
but I do know the answers to questions that have
already been asked and
Hi Mathias;
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
You mean like just tar them all and put them with the
binary
release?
Yes. Even packaging as extension and deploying these
packages as part of a binary release does not look
fundamentally different than
+1
I think it's simple enough. We can make life
more difficult after 3.4.
Still the italian dictionary is GPL only.
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 24.11.2011 um 20:46 schrieb Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org:
Hi Mathias;
--- On Thu, 11/24/11
I have already lost much time on this, but I will give
this a last attempt.
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe some are making an unstated and unwarranted
assumption that our
source release will contain 100% of what is in SVN?
That would
explain much of the
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Here are some proposal elements around the Attack
Surface of Apache
OpenOffice and keeping it small:
P1. Extensions, supplements, and updates
downloaded by the run-time
installer or product shall only be retrieved from URLs
--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
This is the surest and easiest way forward. If you want to
volunteer to
implement an alternative approach then feel free to make a
proposal for
what you want to do.
Oh. I solved this issue already for PedroOffice. I will amuse
(Sorry for the delay: different timezone, busy morning etc)
My build is a bad example because I use an automated build
(ports tree) and am in the process of using more prepackaged
stuff when possible.
Just for reference, it looks like this:
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-odk \
Hi;
That's very cool. Thanks Armand!
I've checked out the status of AGG and while the new version
is GPL'd, it was abandoned and the community has done some
enhancements on the BSD licensed version that I could bring
in.
I thought AGG would've been useful for your SVG stuff but
it looks like I
Hi Eric, *,
--- On Wed, 11/23/11, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
...
To be sure : is the plan to use gmake for the whole build
?
That's the plan but my understanding is that gnumake4
doesn't yet achieve that completely.
cheers,
Pedro.
Hmmm ...
Nevermind, OpenPKG is rather bulky.
Unfortunately portable packagers seem not
to be too common anymore.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE]: 118605 remove epm?
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
fetch_tarballs.sh, perhaps you can test my update to that
script? (attached).
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On 11/22/11 1:52 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hmmm ...
Nevermind, OpenPKG is rather bulky.
Unfortunately portable packagers
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
...
Changing or removing a PayPal button can't be a big issue.
+1, I can do it but will that mean I have to maintain it?
I can't read Spanish and therefore i depend on a good
explanation. But i
would really appreciate if we as PPMC can
Hi Ariel;
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
I'm checking out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/es
Can one review the content and commit the changes directly
on svn? (I've
read there is some kind of web tool for this).
I will review it as the external cppunit was breaking
the build on SAL here.
Thanks!
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
Hi all,
Another category-x licensed library is gone. A
pre-installed cppunit can be used instead. The gnu make
build system needed some
Hello;
I am getting this after r1204995 :
...
=
Building module mythes
=
...
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating mythes.pc
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status:
Hi;
Andre's patch looks good: it passes SAL on my system.
My compile is now broken by an unrelated commit so
if someone feels confident to commit it please go
ahead.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I will review it as the external cppunit was breaking
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Subject: Re: System broken at mythes
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 4:41 PM
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:16:47PM -0800, Pedro
: System broken at mythes
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 5:48 PM
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:00:40PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni
wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
...
the underlying error is on the original
mythes/makefile.mk:
it shouldn't set the BUILD_ACTION to make, but to
$(GNUMAKE)
Can you try this in when $(GUI)==UNX ?
This should solve the problem :)
I tried it but it
I was able to continue building and so far it looks good.
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next half
hour or so :).
Thanks Andre!
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
Andre's patch looks good: it passes SAL on my system.
My compile is now broken
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 23.11.11 04:07, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
I was able to continue building and so far it looks
good.
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next
half hour or so :).
Let's wait a little bit longer, that we can do
Hmm...
Not pretending to defend or condemn anyone here,
but it would seem like SUN/Oracle had approved
some external uses of the trademark that the ASF
is not likely to approve.
As long as they don't carry ASF logos we should
be patient and allow time for some transition
to go on.
FWIW, I think
Hi guys;
FWIW, I found an interesting statement corresponding to
the OpenOffice.org logo:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/art/galleries/logos/
In order to protect the brand OpenOffice.org, the logo is not licensed under
an open source license. As it is trademarked you are allowed to use it, if
FWIW;
It would be really nice to have a Windows buildbot.
http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Sun, 11/20/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
Hi Ross,
The goal is to be able to do the Windows Build with the
free tools that Microsoft has
Hi Mathias;
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
We have used them. At that time they where a PITA as
updating them from the master or integrating them
into it was very time consuming and required a lot
of manual merging work. That worked much better
with
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
This is not my area of expertise by
any means.
And I have a concern that this is topic is being
over-simplified. This description is to test my own
understanding of what it takes.
I have concern that things
Hello;
Probably everybody out there knows the BSD beastie
image:
http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/mainpage/images.html
This image is copyrighted by Kirk Mckusick:
http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/mainpage/copyright.html
And I have his permission to use it for the AOO FreeBSD
port (He even sent me
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Rob Weir wrote:
So you have his permission to use it. But does Apache
have his permission? And what about downstream
consumers? Although it is unlikely, we need to consider
the possibility that someone else takes
the BSD port and customizes it and then
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Pedro,
Why does bringing in a CWS require creating diffs?
If the CWS is installed on a client, any diffing can be
done afterwards using tools that support SVN, yes?
As I explained before I don't know how to use
--- On Sat, 11/19/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 19.11.2011 15:22, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
I think we could use a SVN branch as a buffer to
integrate CWSs one by one; that way we don't interrupt
current work and get to try the CWSs before the tree
changes too much
at least 8 months. There's some gnumake3 merging
too. All of the changes I inspected were to *.mk
files. I got cross-eyed following paths backward in
the graph and gave up without finding where gnumake4
started.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org
Hi Eric;
--- On Fri, 11/18/11, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Disclaimer: this list is not
easy to read, and if the topic was already discussed. In
this case, thanks in advance to provide me the right link
:-)
Hi,
I perfectly know the importance of the IP clearance, but in
501 - 600 of 838 matches
Mail list logo
