have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades to previous versions of OOo. and
Please send a short note to the ooo-dev
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna
keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote:
snip
In any case your questions suggests a simple misunderstanding. The
issue with the extensions in 3.4 is not that the 3.4 install is
overwriting a profile or anything like that. It is not, as you say.
.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:09
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time
to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
[mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 02:06
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
On 3/2/12 6:38 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help
:09
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It
is time to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early
incubator releases
Putting everything together, from a non coder point of view: most dev
builds up to now used their own install path and a different user
profile path (at least on Linux), so the problem is not to do that but
IF AOO 3.4 *need* to do that.
Options:
1- Use same install path and same user profile
On 3/2/12 6:38 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
box. If the revision shown there matches the build you installed
(e..g, r1293550) then the install was a success. Please send a short
note to
, 2012 02:06
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
On 3/2/12 6:38 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
box. If the revision shown there matches
extensions
that are there now are for OO.o (and perhaps LibreOffice).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 02:06
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
On 3
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:09
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time
to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early incubator
releases should not overload prior versions of OO.o. I recommend that AOO 3.4
install in
On 06/03/2012, at 4:30, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early
incubator releases should not
: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is
time to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early
incubator releases should not overload prior versions
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2012, at 4:30, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache OpenOffice 3.4 early
incubator releases
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 05:46, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2012, at 4:30, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing to provide code there is no point in making
suggestions? I am getting sick of this insulting attitude that is way
On 2012-03-05 1:52 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
If there is no solution for extensions, Apache
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 06:07, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 05:46, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2012, at 4:30, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08 PM
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 05:46, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2012, at 4:30, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 12:08
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing to provide code there is no point
in
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 06:07, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 05:46, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2012, at
Le 5 mars 12 à 21:29, Rob Weir a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Larry Gusaas
larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is
On 2012-03-05 2:29 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing
OOops, my mail should have started with hello,
Apologies, I was not very polite :-/
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
On 2012-03-05 3:30 PM Rob Weir wrote:
I'll put it to you quickly simple. If you have been paying attention
you will realize that we're discussing release blocking issues.
I have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could
2012/3/5 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
Overwriting OOo and eliminating the extensions will create a huge howl from
tons of users and create unnecessary extra work for the people providing
user support.
+1. I think that adding an a on the path of both, install folder and
user profile
?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades to previous versions of OOo. and
Please send a short note to the ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org telling us
what platform
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
Overwriting OOo and eliminating the extensions will create a huge howl from
tons of users and create unnecessary extra work for the people providing
user support.
+1. I think that
-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 14:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time
to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 3
2012/3/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
Overwriting OOo and eliminating the extensions will create a huge howl from
tons of users and create unnecessary extra work for the people
. It
doesn't matter. It is clearly before us at this moment.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 14:39
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is
time to test
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:06 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
Overwriting OOo and eliminating the extensions will create a huge howl from
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-03-05 1:44 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Again, your opinion carries as far as your willingness to code an
alternative install approach.
Are you saying that unless one is willing to provide code there is no point
in making suggestions? I am
.
I have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades to previous versions of OOo. and
Please send a short note to the ooo
On Mar 5, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/5 Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com:
Overwriting OOo and eliminating the extensions will create a huge howl from
tons of users and create unnecessary extra work for the
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of the 3.4 plan. We discussed it
extensively in early December. Certainly if you have new information, new workarounds, new
proposals, or even new code, then I'm new we all would love to know about
.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 15:08
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time
to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:03 PM
attention
you will realize that we're discussing release blocking issues.
I have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of the 3.4 plan.
We discussed it extensively in early December. Certainly if you have new
information, new workarounds,
@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is
time to test)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I recall the discussion about the BerkeleyDB. However, the dots with
respect
have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades to previous versions of OOo. and
Please send a short note to the ooo-dev
On 2012-03-05 7:11 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Actually, there are grve misunderstandings here, both procedural and
technical., Some have taken the fact that the extensions need to be
reinstalled and extrapolated that as evidence that the profiles are
overwritten.
I have never said that profiles are
attention
you will realize that we're discussing release blocking issues.
I have been paying attention. Have you?
In the thread Calling all volunteers: It is time to test you wrote
We could use help verifying the install in all real-world scenarios, on
clean OS installs,
as upgrades
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 7:11 PM Rob Weir wrote:
Actually, there are grve misunderstandings here, both procedural and
technical., Some have taken the fact that the extensions need to be
reinstalled and extrapolated that as
On 2012-03-05 7:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of the 3.4 plan.
We discussed it extensively in early December. Certainly if you
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 7:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2012-03-05 4:38 PM Rob Weir wrote:
This has been known for several months and has been part of
On 2012-03-05 7:51 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never said that profiles are overwritten. I said that the extensions
were deleted from the user profile. Please read what has been written before
accusing people of grave
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [EXTENSIONS][RELEASE] (was RE: Calling all volunteers: It is time
to test)
On 2012-03-05 7:51 PM Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never said that profiles are overwritten. I said
On 2012-03-05 8:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
As I said before, the point was that requiring users to reinstall
extensions is not unreasonable. It is certainly better than what you
are recommending, that users must reinstall extensions but then they
also lose every other setting and preference they
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-05 8:17 PM Rob Weir wrote:
As I said before, the point was that requiring users to reinstall
extensions is not unreasonable. It is certainly better than what you
are recommending, that users must
2012/3/6 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
B: Require the user to reinstall extensions, but preserve the user
settings, so after the extensions are reinstalled the user has all
their settings and preferences.
The office removes extension directories which are not registered in the pmap
file during
Hi,
after downloading the multi language OOo-Dev 3.4.0_m1 build (r1293550)
for Windows from
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1293550/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_nl.exe
Norton Internet Security found WS.Reputation.1 and removed the
Hi,
On 02.03.2012 11:22, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
after downloading the multi language OOo-Dev 3.4.0_m1 build (r1293550) for
Windows from
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1293550/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_nl.exe
Norton Internet
On 3/2/2012 05:22, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
after downloading the multi language OOo-Dev 3.4.0_m1 build (r1293550)
for Windows from
http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1293550/win32/OOo-Dev_OOO340m1_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_nl.exe
Norton Internet Security found
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 3:53 AM
Subject: NIS reporting WS.Reputation.1 on Windows developer snapshots [was: Re:
Calling all volunteers: It is time to test]
Hi,
On 02.03.2012 11:22, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
after downloading the multi language OOo-Dev 3.4.0_m1
On 2012-02-29 8:18 AM Rob Weir wrote:
Once you have installed, launch OpenOffice and look at the Help/About
box. If the revision shown there matches the build you installed
(e..g, r1293550) then the install was a success. Please send a short
note to theooo-...@incubator.apache.org telling us
Hi,
On 01.03.2012 03:00, NoOp wrote:
On 02/29/2012 06:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 01.03.2012 03:00, NoOp wrote:
On 02/29/2012 06:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more
On 03/01/2012 12:46 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 01.03.2012 03:00, NoOp wrote:
On 02/29/2012 06:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
...
If you are ready to test, you can download the latest developer
snapshot build from this page:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snip
So in order to avoid further confusion, I still think it would be
helpful to clarify which version the 'Call to volunteers' are supposed
to be testing (ooo-dev or 'full normal install').
I think testing either install set
robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snip
So in order to avoid further confusion, I still think it would be
helpful
...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
snip
So in order to avoid further confusion, I still think it would be
helpful to clarify
true method of posting
DS/Beta/RC et al on:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
rather than on a Calling all volunteers: It is time to test with a
unclear link to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
and asking users/testers to go
Can you give me some clarification on exactly what I should test?
I just downloaded and installed
OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz and it seems to NOT have
the English language. It does, however, seem to have classic French.
I also do not see the en-US language pack that I can
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this requires, and how you can help.
First, if you have never tested a pre-release
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:18 -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this requires, and how you can
2012/2/29 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this requires, and how you can help.
First,
Hi;
On 02/29/12 18:12, RGB ES wrote:
...
On Linux 64 bits, loaded a ~150 page Writer document with ~50
pictures, 40 of them captioned, ~100 Math objects, all with Linux
Libertine G and Linux Biolinum G fonts with lots of Graphite font
features enabled. No problem.
Then opened a 3 MiB, 320 page
2012/3/1 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org:
Hi;
On 02/29/12 18:12, RGB ES wrote:
...
On Linux 64 bits, loaded a ~150 page Writer document with ~50
pictures, 40 of them captioned, ~100 Math objects, all with Linux
Libertine G and Linux Biolinum G fonts with lots of Graphite font
features
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this requires,
On 02/29/2012 06:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
As we approach the first Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice 3.4,
it would be wonderful if we could have some more volunteers testing
the latest dev snapshots builds. Following is some information on what
this requires, and how you can help.
Hi Rob
Is it also possible to paste it to the blog?
just paste ... nothing more effort than rewriting, or is it a marketing matter?
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
Subject: Calling all volunteers: It is time to test
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:18:21 -0500
As we approach
73 matches
Mail list logo
